AGW finally explained

[whit3rd]

On Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-8, Phil Allison wrote:

** Think there are two possibilities with AGW:
--------------------------------------------

1. The Cruel God Theory.

We poor humans have been sitting on a knife edge for over a million years, with massive amounts of coal, gas and oil under the ground waiting to be used to vasty improve all our lives.

But we can use barley any of the damn stuff cos the CO2 produced thereby will immediately render the planet uninhabitable to punish us.

For what ??


2. Fallible Humans Theory:

The current AGW panic is not well based and driven mostly by folk with hidden agendas. Prophets of Doom are not a new thing.

But, where's the explanation? Two theories (both trash, as far as I can tell) isn't
a 'final' position of any description. Neither has any relevance to planning for a
viable future on this planet, so even if one of 'em is right, it's worthless.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 3:03:08 PM UTC+11, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:

Why would lefties want to halt the free enterprise system ?

Because they want people desperate so they will vote for more freebies.

The serious left doesn't offer freebies. Every bit of government support to people who need it has to be paid for by higher taxes.

> The leftists promise more freebies, but do not deliver.

Jurb believes the right wing propaganda that claims that they are offering freebies.

Pretty much every advanced industrial country other than the US delivers universal health care. It isn't free, but even the most comprehensive systems cost two thirds as much per head as the US system, and deliver better outcomes for the populaltion as a whole.

> The leftists are totally useless people and want to be superior, so everyone else has to dumb down.

More right-wing propaganda.

> Like that movie 'The King And I", no-ones head may be higher than King. When he sits you all sit. It is a matter of power, and it is a game. I am learning the game.

You are being gamed. Learn a bit more.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 11/9/19 11:03 PM, jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

Why would lefties want to halt the free enterprise system ?

Because they want people desperate so they will vote for more freebies.

The leftists promise more freebies, but do not deliver. The leftists are totally useless people and want to be superior, so everyone else has to dub down.

Like that movie 'The King And I", noones head may be higher than King. When he sits you all sit. It is a matter of power, and it is a game. I am learning the game.

How would you define "power" in this context using a word that is not
"power."

What is it's "nature", if you will.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 2:37:08 PM UTC+11, Phil Allison wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

-----------------------------------------



Hi to all my followers...


** Think there are two possibilities with AGW:
--------------------------------------------

1. The Cruel God Theory.

We poor humans have been sitting on a knife edge for over a million years, with massive amounts of coal, gas and oil under the ground waiting to be used to vasty improve all our lives.

But we can use barley any of the damn stuff cos the CO2 produced thereby will immediately render the planet uninhabitable to punish us.

For what ??


2. Fallible Humans Theory:

The current AGW panic is not well based and driven mostly by folk with hidden agendas. Prophets of Doom are not a new thing.

When researchers get alarming results, they are duty bound to publish them - even if only computer model predictions with no history of accuracy.

Once a committee made up of international bureaucrats was given the god like task of deciding if the human race was really in peril - they opted for the least dangerous path, for themselves.

Money poured in for more research and was grabbed with both hands, everyone involved well knowing what was the needed outcome and what was not in order to keep the funds and jobs flowing.

Not a hoax as such, but a predictable phenomenon.

Funny thing how soon as computer climate models were written they predicted disaster.

We would *never* have known otherwise...





Consider (3), that CO2 is good for the planet, and God put us here to
dig all that sequestered carbon out of the ground and put it back
where it's most useful.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth


** Cannot be for real, put up job from the coal industry.

Wrong. The stomata in leaves are smaller when CO2 levels are higher.

This means that the plants can collect enough while losing less water. Their growth tends to be limited by their water supply, so losing less water means that they can have more leaves. They lose water in other ways so 35% less water loss doesn't equate to 35% more growth.

Lead author is a Chinese Communist - so we know he is obliged to find data that supports China's continued massive use of the stuff.

Right ?

Wrong. China has invested hugely in manufacturing solar cells in high volune - not just any solar cells but the high yield solar cells developed at the University of New South Wales a few years ago.

https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science-tech/pioneering-solar-engineer-stuart-wenham-dies-aged-60

China suffers horribly from air pollution by the output coal burning generator plants. They've shut down a lot of the old, dirty inefficient units and are investing heavily in renewable energy generation. It will be a while before they can shut down the more modern coal-fired generators but they are working on it.

More than can be said for your precious Liberals in Australia.

They've even started installing grid scale batteries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery.

> Though I would get one in before Bill pours his drivel all over it.

Your drivel is superior in some way? If it was, you wouldn't feel the need to get in first.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 11/10/19 1:42 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 3:03:08 PM UTC+11, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would lefties want to halt the free enterprise system ?

Because they want people desperate so they will vote for more freebies.

The serious left doesn't offer freebies. Every bit of government support to people who need it has to be paid for by higher taxes.

The leftists promise more freebies, but do not deliver.

Jurb believes the right wing propaganda that claims that they are offering freebies.

Pretty much every advanced industrial country other than the US delivers universal health care. It isn't free, but even the most comprehensive systems cost two thirds as much per head as the US system, and deliver better outcomes for the populaltion as a whole.

The leftists are totally useless people and want to be superior, so everyone else has to dumb down.

More right-wing propaganda.

Like that movie 'The King And I", no-ones head may be higher than King. When he sits you all sit. It is a matter of power, and it is a game. I am learning the game.

You are being gamed. Learn a bit more.

Shhh I'm trying to ask Jurb a deep philosophical question here but
you're delivering the punch line too early! :|

 

[Mike Coon]

In article <8c68039c-9325-444e-b9bb-461a52649f50@googlegroups.com>,
pallison49@gmail.com says...

But we can use barley any of the damn stuff cos the CO2 produced

Barley [sic] does produce CO2, otherwise the beer would be flat!

Mike.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 11:04:40 AM UTC+11, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:

On Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 6:46:43 PM UTC-5, Phil Allison wrote:
bule...@columbus.rr.com wrote:

Here is my explanation....every proposed solution to
fix AWG advances leftist agendas. That is all i need to know

** I'm sure that is a complete co-incidence.

Why would lefties want to halt the free enterprise system?

They don't - or at least not the one's you are likely to run into.

> > To create a one idea world government?

Leftists do have more than one idea. Right-wingers can barely manage one.

I mean, they enjoy all the benefits too.

Are they mad at us for something ?

They are mad at how God made the world. You are just the proxy object to vent it out on.

Quite a few leftists are atheists and agnostics. They aren't even convinced that there is a God to get mad at.

They frequently think that world can be changed for the better, which isn't an idea that right-wingers share - right-wingers don't understand the world well enough to want to let anybody change it and make it even harder to understand.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 5:02:52 AM UTC-5, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 11:04:40 AM UTC+11, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 6:46:43 PM UTC-5, Phil Allison wrote:
bule...@columbus.rr.com wrote:

Here is my explanation....every proposed solution to
fix AWG advances leftist agendas. That is all i need to know

** I'm sure that is a complete co-incidence.

Why would lefties want to halt the free enterprise system?

They don't - or at least not the one's you are likely to run into.

To create a one idea world government?

Leftists do have more than one idea. Right-wingers can barely manage one.

I mean, they enjoy all the benefits too.

Are they mad at us for something ?

They are mad at how God made the world. You are just the proxy object to vent it out on.

Quite a few leftists are atheists and agnostics. They aren't even convinced that there is a God to get mad at.

They frequently think that world can be changed for the better, which isn't an idea that right-wingers share - right-wingers don't understand the world well enough to want to let anybody change it and make it even harder to understand.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Right wingers look to history to see what can be changed. Lefties believe that they alone know how to make men perfect and look to bring men into perfection. Remember how Pol Pot set the clock to year 0? Hitler wanted to have year 1 of a thousand year Reich. Lefties claim they want to make things better but when they get their way misery ensues.

Additionally, right wingers try to change the world by being better themselves. lefties go for making the world better by forcing others to live to their level of perfection.

It is funny that in this brave new world of political correctness it is the lefties who spout moral outrage (How Dare you).

 

[Rick C]

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 7:13:33 AM UTC-5, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 5:02:52 AM UTC-5, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 11:04:40 AM UTC+11, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 6:46:43 PM UTC-5, Phil Allison wrote:
bule...@columbus.rr.com wrote:

Here is my explanation....every proposed solution to
fix AWG advances leftist agendas. That is all i need to know

** I'm sure that is a complete co-incidence.

Why would lefties want to halt the free enterprise system?

They don't - or at least not the one's you are likely to run into.

To create a one idea world government?

Leftists do have more than one idea. Right-wingers can barely manage one.

I mean, they enjoy all the benefits too.

Are they mad at us for something ?

They are mad at how God made the world. You are just the proxy object to vent it out on.

Quite a few leftists are atheists and agnostics. They aren't even convinced that there is a God to get mad at.

They frequently think that world can be changed for the better, which isn't an idea that right-wingers share - right-wingers don't understand the world well enough to want to let anybody change it and make it even harder to understand.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Right wingers look to history to see what can be changed. Lefties believe that they alone know how to make men perfect and look to bring men into perfection. Remember how Pol Pot set the clock to year 0? Hitler wanted to have year 1 of a thousand year Reich. Lefties claim they want to make things better but when they get their way misery ensues.

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

On Sunday, 10 November 2019 17:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas.

Trouble with lefties is they think they know better when they don't understand it much at all. They then try to force everyone else to live by thier dumb rules.

 

[bitrex]

On 11/9/19 10:37 PM, Phil Allison wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

-----------------------------------------



Hi to all my followers...


** Think there are two possibilities with AGW:
--------------------------------------------

1. The Cruel God Theory.

We poor humans have been sitting on a knife edge for over a million years, with massive amounts of coal, gas and oil under the ground waiting to be used to vasty improve all our lives.

But we can use barley any of the damn stuff cos the CO2 produced thereby will immediately render the planet uninhabitable to punish us.

For what ??


2. Fallible Humans Theory:

The current AGW panic is not well based and driven mostly by folk with hidden agendas. Prophets of Doom are not a new thing.

When researchers get alarming results, they are duty bound to publish them - even if only computer model predictions with no history of accuracy.

Once a committee made up of international bureaucrats was given the god like task of deciding if the human race was really in peril - they opted for the least dangerous path, for themselves.

Money poured in for more research and was grabbed with both hands, everyone involved well knowing what was the needed outcome and what was not in order to keep the funds and jobs flowing.

Not a hoax as such, but a predictable phenomenon.

Funny thing how soon as computer climate models were written they predicted disaster.

We would *never* have known otherwise...





Consider (3), that CO2 is good for the planet, and God put us here to
dig all that sequestered carbon out of the ground and put it back
where it's most useful.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth


** Cannot be for real, put up job from the coal industry.

Lead author is a Chinese Communist - so we know he is obliged to find data that supports China's continued massive use of the stuff.

Right ?

Though I would get one in before Bill pours his drivel all over it.



..... Phil ;-)

God put John Larkin here to read the mind of God.

 

[Rick C]

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 12:28:56 PM UTC-5, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas..

Are you trying to say Trump is a leftist? He seems to have decided it was important to reduce taxes without a way to pay for it. The result? Record levels of both the total debt and the debt relative to GDP. Even with lower interest rates, the total annual interest paid under Trump is higher than any other time.

Yeah, obviously Trump is a lefty!!!

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:14:10 -0800 (PST), tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, 10 November 2019 17:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas.

Trouble with lefties is they think they know better when they don't understand it much at all. They then try to force everyone else to live by thier dumb rules.

Exactly. And when they make things worse, it inspires them to do more
of the same.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 12:48:54 PM UTC+11, k...@notreal.com wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:14:10 -0800 (PST), tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, 10 November 2019 17:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas.

Trouble with lefties is they think they know better when they don't understand it much at all. They then try to force everyone else to live by their dumb rules.

Yet they don't either. Epstien, and his many lefty customers, come to
mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#Israeli_startup

If krw knew enough to know how to spell Epstein, he might know about some of the righty customers too.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 6:14:16 AM UTC+11, tabb...@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, 10 November 2019 17:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas.

Trouble with lefties is they think they know better when they don't understand it much at all. They then try to force everyone else to live by their dumb rules.

NT has his own dumb rules, and doesn't understand much at all. One of the things that he has failed to understand is how little he does understand.

Trust him to chime in in support of Cursitor Doom - the idiot faction sticks together.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:14:10 -0800 (PST), tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, 10 November 2019 17:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas.

Trouble with lefties is they think they know better when they don't understand it much at all. They then try to force everyone else to live by thier dumb rules.

Yet they don't either. Epstien, and his many lefty customers, come to
mind.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 4:28:56 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas..

The US national debt is large at the moment. When George W Bush - right-winger - was president he ignored the US house price bubble which created the global financial crisis when it burst.

The not-particularly-left-wing administration that followed was stuck with using deficit-funded stimulus to keep the economy out of depression, which ran up the national debt. They'd got it out of trouble by the time Donald Trump got elected, but Donald Trump then introduced a cut in the US corporate tax rate to buy a few more votes, and didn't bother to find any new tax income to pay for it, pushing the US deficit up even higher.

It wasn't any kind of grand idea but he didn't find an answer to the problem of paying for.

Cursiotr Doom is obviously unfamiliar with anything that might look like a real world fact.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 1:36:39 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:14:10 -0800 (PST), tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, 10 November 2019 17:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 08:58:52 -0800, Rick C wrote:

Yes, the US is so much more miserable for having the ACA which the right
wing was going to repeal, except that all the miserable people would
have voted them out of office.

Oh, the misery!

You're obviously unfamiliar with the size of the national debt. What are
you going to cut spending on to finance the ACA? Or are you going to just
bung in on the debt and let the next and subsequent generations deal with
it?
You Lefties have all the answers - except how to pay for your grand ideas.

Trouble with lefties is they think they know better when they don't understand it much at all. They then try to force everyone else to live by their dumb rules.

Exactly. And when they make things worse, it inspires them to do more
of the same.

The right wing in the US is very fond of income inequality. The more unequal the income distribution, the worse society gets, but this doesn't seem to put them off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_Level_(book)

documents this - comparing both a bunch of advanced industrial countries (including the US) and the states within the US to demonstrate this in action.

The US right doesn't like the book at all, but has yet to demonstrate that it has got anything wrong.

John Larkin is unlikely to be able to come up with an equally convincing exposition of the left being as stupid.

He may come up with something which he will imagine to be comparable, but he won't be able to perceive its flaws even after they have been pointed out to him.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 11/9/19 10:49 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 19:37:04 -0800 (PST), Phil Allison
pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

-----------------------------------------



Hi to all my followers...


** Think there are two possibilities with AGW:
--------------------------------------------

1. The Cruel God Theory.

We poor humans have been sitting on a knife edge for over a million years, with massive amounts of coal, gas and oil under the ground waiting to be used to vasty improve all our lives.

But we can use barley any of the damn stuff cos the CO2 produced thereby will immediately render the planet uninhabitable to punish us.

For what ??


2. Fallible Humans Theory:

The current AGW panic is not well based and driven mostly by folk with hidden agendas. Prophets of Doom are not a new thing.

When researchers get alarming results, they are duty bound to publish them - even if only computer model predictions with no history of accuracy.

Once a committee made up of international bureaucrats was given the god like task of deciding if the human race was really in peril - they opted for the least dangerous path, for themselves.

Money poured in for more research and was grabbed with both hands, everyone involved well knowing what was the needed outcome and what was not in order to keep the funds and jobs flowing.

Not a hoax as such, but a predictable phenomenon.

Funny thing how soon as computer climate models were written they predicted disaster.

We would *never* have known otherwise...





Consider (3), that CO2 is good for the planet, and God put us here to
dig all that sequestered carbon out of the ground and put it back
where it's most useful.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth


** Cannot be for real, put up job from the coal industry.

Lead author is a Chinese Communist - so we know he is obliged to find data that supports China's continued massive use of the stuff.

Right ?

Though I would get one in before Bill pours his drivel all over it.



..... Phil ;-)


Yeah, NASA is a big fraud. They keep publishing pictures that show
that the earth is round. And we all know that the moon landings were
fake.

Here's a good book about a big fraud:

<https://www.amazon.com/Bad-Blood-Secrets-Silicon-Startup/dp/152473165X/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8>

Forget Greta, when a real blonde haired blue-eyed determined manipulator
shows up she scams the shit out of everybody! It took years for anyone
to consider doing any due diligence on this barely-out-of-her-teens
Stanford-dropout sociopath.

Look at this rogue's gallery of dumbos. Most of them never had a clue it
was all hogwash:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theranos#Management>

Taken down by a WSJ journalist doing what journalist's job should be,
pointing out the Empress has no clothes.

It's amazing what one female teeny bopper can accomplish who knows how
to tell men in government, business, and tech what they want to hear and
make visions of dollar signs appear. They thought she was the next Jobs.
Hahaha..

 

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 02:52:20 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 11/9/19 10:49 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 19:37:04 -0800 (PST), Phil Allison
pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

-----------------------------------------



Hi to all my followers...


** Think there are two possibilities with AGW:
--------------------------------------------

1. The Cruel God Theory.

We poor humans have been sitting on a knife edge for over a million years, with massive amounts of coal, gas and oil under the ground waiting to be used to vasty improve all our lives.

But we can use barley any of the damn stuff cos the CO2 produced thereby will immediately render the planet uninhabitable to punish us.

For what ??


2. Fallible Humans Theory:

The current AGW panic is not well based and driven mostly by folk with hidden agendas. Prophets of Doom are not a new thing.

When researchers get alarming results, they are duty bound to publish them - even if only computer model predictions with no history of accuracy.

Once a committee made up of international bureaucrats was given the god like task of deciding if the human race was really in peril - they opted for the least dangerous path, for themselves.

Money poured in for more research and was grabbed with both hands, everyone involved well knowing what was the needed outcome and what was not in order to keep the funds and jobs flowing.

Not a hoax as such, but a predictable phenomenon.

Funny thing how soon as computer climate models were written they predicted disaster.

We would *never* have known otherwise...





Consider (3), that CO2 is good for the planet, and God put us here to
dig all that sequestered carbon out of the ground and put it back
where it's most useful.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth


** Cannot be for real, put up job from the coal industry.

Lead author is a Chinese Communist - so we know he is obliged to find data that supports China's continued massive use of the stuff.

Right ?

Though I would get one in before Bill pours his drivel all over it.



..... Phil ;-)


Yeah, NASA is a big fraud. They keep publishing pictures that show
that the earth is round. And we all know that the moon landings were
fake.



Here's a good book about a big fraud:

https://www.amazon.com/Bad-Blood-Secrets-Silicon-Startup/dp/152473165X/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

Forget Greta, when a real blonde haired blue-eyed determined manipulator
shows up she scams the shit out of everybody! It took years for anyone
to consider doing any due diligence on this barely-out-of-her-teens
Stanford-dropout sociopath.

Look at this rogue's gallery of dumbos. Most of them never had a clue it
was all hogwash:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theranos#Management

Taken down by a WSJ journalist doing what journalist's job should be,
pointing out the Empress has no clothes.

No clothes? It was the turtleneck that raised billions.

It's amazing what one female teeny bopper can accomplish who knows how
to tell men in government, business, and tech what they want to hear and
make visions of dollar signs appear. They thought she was the next Jobs.
Hahaha..

How did she fool all those experts on her board?

She was sort of cute.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics