R
Ricketty C
Guest
On Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 6:22:49 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
It\'s funny that you can\'t come up with anything better to say that this. The point is that using either of these phrases means you have failed.
This group brings out the worst in me sometimes. I\'m pretty sure I say things here I would never say to a person standing in front of me. But then I would most likely never converse face to face with most of the people I have those sorts of conversations with online.
You are pretty much at that point online. You have so little to say that anyone wants to hear it is amazing.
The one (of many) I have trouble with is when I can\'t quite describe a word that I\'m looking for and can\'t get it to turn up in any Google searches.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:51:32 +0100, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:48:50 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CFKinsey@military.org.jp> wrote:
Fuck you. Google didn\'t find the answer, the group did. I win.
So much for a polite discussion. You\'re not fit to command, yet. Real
commanders should know how to insult without resorting to profanity.
And real humans know that profanity is just words. Which annoys you most?
1) You absolute and utter moronic fool.
2) You silly shite.
It\'s funny that you can\'t come up with anything better to say that this. The point is that using either of these phrases means you have failed.
I try to not write anything that I would not consider worth reading.
You might try that approach in the future. It works.
With snobs maybe.
This group brings out the worst in me sometimes. I\'m pretty sure I say things here I would never say to a person standing in front of me. But then I would most likely never converse face to face with most of the people I have those sorts of conversations with online.
You are pretty much at that point online. You have so little to say that anyone wants to hear it is amazing.
If you had inscribed your original questions into Google:
\"Are any TVs just LED?\"
https://www.google.com/search?q=Are+any+TVs+just+LED%3F
the first result is:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/led-vs-lcd-tvs/
The article goes through the major LED TV display and lighting
technologies. Along the way, it mentions OLED and QOLED (quantum dot
LED) with links to more detailed explanations. That should have been
sufficient to answer your question.
You got lucky with the right keywords then.
Google and the Duck2Go have spent considerable effort producing search
algorithms that will successfully parse vague questions. If I don\'t
know or can\'t remember the magic buzzword, I can usually find it in
the first few pages that these algorithms produce.
And sometimes those algorithms fail. It\'s not as bad as back in the days of Webcrawler, but it\'s not perfect.
Like flash RAM, Usenet is a read before you write system.
Nope, it works without reading first.
The second part of your question \"do they exist?\" is also easily
answered. If Google can\'t find it, it doesn\'t exist.
Or I didn\'t feed it the right words.
The one (of many) I have trouble with is when I can\'t quite describe a word that I\'m looking for and can\'t get it to turn up in any Google searches.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209