ABC Inventors - electrical safety device

[Brad Hogan]

It seems to be a device to be built into or retrofitted into an
appliance, as is implied in the video, and as such, the only way I can
think it would work is to "learn" the typical current/voltage usage
patterns of the device its connected to - and if there is any sudden
change in these patterns- (that 'looks' consistent with human contact
or "hazardous" leakage for example?) that seems suss, then it shuts
off the power.

you cant do that for $1.50

You could do it for $1000.

If this is the case, (its in the appliance) then surely it would
provide no protection for the cord, plug etc of that appliance, and
these probably need to be protected a lot more than the innards of the
appliance, as cords are so easily damaged, and often touched by the
consumer ?

true.



for that matter - if his magic device is INSIDE the

hairdryer - and the dryer is then thrown into the bathwater - it might
very well do a great job of cutting the power to the dryer's
internals, but how is it going to stop the current still flowing down
the cord and into his device ?

true, its pointless . they wont build the hair dryer to do it.

I also find it strange his implication that appliances with 2 pin
plugs "seem to be unable to work effectively with an RCD compared to 3
pin ones".

He would have tested two wire hair dryer in a ceramic vanity basin with
plasic pipes.
Do you see any thing for an RCD to detect ??

Now take a three wire hair dryer. There's water between active and earth.
I see an RCD trigger.



The protex is only working because its requiring the third wire in the hair
dryer.

Stick to the RCD and combine the protex into it.

That would make it a "RCSVD " Residual current or stray voltage device.

As I see it - an RCD will work just as well with 2 pin as
3 to protect a human body from electric shock, as long as you have an
earth connection, (ie: the ground you are standing on) and if you
didnt have a ground connection to your body when you touched the
active lead, you aren't going to get a shock anyway, unless you grab
both active and neutral.

yes, quite correct.

I didn't see the process where the panel interviewed him on the device
- and there are no details even remotely on how it works, either on
his website or the URL you gave above. In fact the whole site seems
to totally avoid the theory of operation and instead give tons of
vague"consumer' type information about how wonderful it is - and will
save the world etc etc.

Yeah he will save the world, but only if the RCD disappears.

all mass produced things cost $1.50 to make. whats the actual sale price
????

also, how many cases would there be of people accidentally coming into
contact with both active and neutral connections *simultaneously* in
domestic situations ? remember that unless you grab both of them at
the same time, (within the trip time of the RCD) then the one you
touch first - will set the RCD off and stop the current flow anyway)

none at all.

this leads to the result that the protex is not as good an RCD,
you should have RCD's first and then protex if you still want more
protection.


The protex may as well be added to the function of the RCD

RCSVD.. Residual Current Stray Voltage Device.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Brad Hogan"

The Protex device trips a normally closed latching solenoid switch upon
detection of a significant AC voltage appearing on the metal case or
internal metal ( non live) parts of the particular Class 2 appliance -
as
measured relative to the neutral wire. Pretty much, this makes it a
submersion detector.


significant AC voltage means the person is well and truely shocked !!!

** Not at all - the mere presence of water inside the appliance will
cause tripping, no need for a person to be the conductor. Plus the AC power
is cut off very fast - faster than an RCD that takes 30mS.

An electrocuted person can be electrocuted by leaks that dont cause such
signficant voltage.

** You have not understood the principle at all.

A Class 2 appliance is not an electrocution risk unless wet or submerged -
in either case the Protex will have isolated it before it could do any harm.





............. Phil

 

[John G]

"Brad Hogan" <brad@pitt.comn> wrote in message
news:4279e5f5$1@news.comindico.com.au...

"John G" <Greentest@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:Y8eee.46$sb6.969@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...

"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@optussnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:agji71lifbikg844o1l3osik3rb28aphsf@4ax.com...
Did anybody see the New Inventors last night? Can anyone guess how
"Protex Switching Technology" works? The inventor said something
about
detecting voltage changes, and using the neutral as the reference.

See http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1356442.htm

In the text Wayne said "It works" but the description is very vague
on details and seems to not understand 'Double Insulated'.
He says it can be built into the device. Well if the switch is in the
hair dryer in the water how does it keep the EXCESS electricity out
of the water?


double insulated .. well the level of insulation isnt relevant, he
was probably trying to think of what doubling the insulation could
do....

(my wires are double insulated - two layers of cling wrap !)

Are you joking?

DOUBE INSULATED is a construction standard for electrical devices.
--
John G

Wot's Your Real Problem?

 

[Chris]

"Heywood Jablome" <reply to thread> wrote in message
news:4279d8b2$0$4658$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

I reckon its all a croc of shit. The only way to get electrocuted to death
if you have an RCD, is if you grab a neutral cable in one hand and an
active
cable in another while standing on an insulated floor. The current has to
pass through the heart or through the brain to kill you. If you read some
stories with regard to electric chairs, you will find that it is actually
quite difficult to kill someone with electricity.

Even a baby that sticks a live two pin plug in its mouth will be ok. Might
just get a big shock but certainly not death. Even then the child will
have
to be insulated from earth.


Same goes with a dryer in a bath tub. A bath tub is often connected with
metal drain pipes to earth. So the RCD will go off if the current is not
balanced between active and neutral. If it is balanced enough to not set
the
RCD off, then there is little risk to the occupant in the bath tub.




I agree. The group of people killed mostly these days by electricity is

electricians and that is due to the widespread deployment of RCD's. What's
the chance of having a hand basin full of water and dropping an electric
shaver into it. NIL. You wouldn't have a handbasin full of water if you are
using an electric shaver. derrrrrrr!!!

There is more chance of this happening to you.
http://www.big-boys.com/articles/badcar.html

Cheers.

 

[KLR]

On Thu, 05 May 2005 08:51:11 GMT, Dave Goldfinch
<daveg50_8@NotCoolMail.invalid> wrote:

On Thu, 5 May 2005 13:45:48 +1000, "Phil Allison"
philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote:


"Franc Zabkar"
Did anybody see the New Inventors last night? Can anyone guess how
"Protex Switching Technology" works? The inventor said something about
detecting voltage changes, and using the neutral as the reference.

See http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1356442.htm


** My two cents worth is this:

The Protex device trips a normally closed latching solenoid switch upon
detection of a significant AC voltage appearing on the metal case or
internal metal ( non live) parts of the particular Class 2 appliance - as
measured relative to the neutral wire. Pretty much, this makes it a
submersion detector.

Such AC voltage detection - if applied to external metal parts would have to
be via a low value Y2 rated capacitor so not to breach Class 2 requirements.





............. Phil




Phil

That would seem to be a plausable explanation but what about if it was
built into a GPO ? There would be no way to sense the voltage on the
case or internal metal without an extra wire back to the GPO.

Perhaps this is why he claims that it 'could' be built into a GPO but
he hasn't done it yet - because it is impractical ?

BTW could you use a triac instead of a solenoid switch or would this
cause problems with some appliances ?

Dave Goldfinch

I dont see how you could safely use a Triac to switch OFF the mains
in a safety product like this. for one, triacs still tend to leak a
bif of voltage even when off, and when triacs (and many such SS
devices) fail, they tend to go short circuit rather than open circuit.
I have heard of people in swimming pools being electrocuted by very
low voltages such as 12 or 24v, so even small leakage occuring through
the bathwater (specially if its possibly made even more conductive
than normal tap water by "contaminants" like skin oils, dirt, soap,
shampoo, bath salts and such)

Also, when used in things like hairdryers, toasters, kettles and such
domestic heating appliances (as shown in the "inventors" video) the
current being drawn could easily be the full 10 amps, and assuming
there is a 0.6v voltage drop across the triac, that would mean power
dissipation of around 6w !

Triacs (used in typical cheap light dimmers) also tend to die (and
internally short) very easily with surges caused by incandescent bulbs
blowing and such.

Again, this is only my thought, but if you absolutely HAD TO have the
mains shut off at such a lightning speed, and you needed a triac or
such device to do it - the mains would have to be also then cut out by
a relay as a back up as well. (and/or some sort of "crow bar" circuit
as well) At least then - even in worst case and the triac shorted and
didnt open the circuit - the relay backing it up would do the job a
fraction of a second later when its contacts finally opened.

 

[Heywood Jablome]

Even a baby that sticks a live two pin plug in its mouth will be ok.


** You have proof of this ????


Might just get a big shock but certainly not death.


** You have proof of this ????


Even then the child will have to be insulated from earth.


** A carpet floor will do that.

My point is that the current has to flow through your heart to have any
chance of killing you. Either from one arm to another or from one arm to a
leg, or through your brain somehow. That is why the old trick of working on
high voltage with one hand behind your back actually does work when working
with high voltage supplies that are not referenced to ground such as high
voltage secondary windings on a transformer etc.

Frilly fact time. Did you know that hospitals use isolated power supplies,
and therefore do not have an active or neutral? Touching either side of the
power points (one at a time) will not hurt you at all.

Same goes with a dryer in a bath tub. A bath tub is often connected with
metal drain pipes to earth. So the RCD will go off if the current is not
balanced between active and neutral. If it is balanced enough to not set
the
RCD off, then there is little risk to the occupant in the bath tub.


** This last one has GOT to be a subject for the Mythbusters .

Not that I have done the research but I bet most deaths caused in this way
occur when a parent goes to pull out the hair dryer while it is still in the
bath tub before turning it off at the power point. -- without an RCD fitted
to the mains of course.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Chris"

The group of people killed mostly these days by electricity is
electricians and that is due to the widespread deployment of RCD's.

** How come RCDs only kill electricians ???

Vengeful little suckers are they ???

What's
the chance of having a hand basin full of water and dropping an electric
shaver into it.

** Very high.

NIL.

** Rot - shaver isolation transformers are sold because of exactly this
risk .

You wouldn't have a handbasin full of water if you are
using an electric shaver. derrrrrrr!!!

** A. What a limited knowledge of shaving you have.

B. The shaver may fall in the basin when not in use but still live.




............ Phil

 

[Kate Fights, I Cry]

Heywood Jablome wrote:

I reckon its all a croc of shit. The only way to get electrocuted to death
if you have an RCD, is if you grab a neutral cable in one hand and an active
cable in another while standing on an insulated floor. The current has to
pass through the heart or through the brain to kill you. If you read some
stories with regard to electric chairs, you will find that it is actually
quite difficult to kill someone with electricity.

Even a baby that sticks a live two pin plug in its mouth will be ok. Might
just get a big shock but certainly not death. Even then the child will have
to be insulated from earth.

Same goes with a dryer in a bath tub. A bath tub is often connected with
metal drain pipes to earth. So the RCD will go off if the current is not
balanced between active and neutral. If it is balanced enough to not set the
RCD off, then there is little risk to the occupant in the bath tub.

Well why don't you try it for yourself and post the results

 

[KLR]

On Thu, 05 May 2005 08:45:01 +1000, Franc Zabkar
<fzabkar@optussnet.com.au> wrote:

Did anybody see the New Inventors last night? Can anyone guess how
"Protex Switching Technology" works? The inventor said something about
detecting voltage changes, and using the neutral as the reference.

See http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1356442.htm


- Franc Zabkar

Go to this video (the link above in the OP's post ) - and take a look
^carefully^ at where he dunks the live light bulb/socket into the
tupperware container of water



If you look carefully - it appears to me to be a 3 pin moulded plug,
and the short length of cord its on also appears to be 3 core round
(about 7.5amp appliance cable)

(IE: it has an earth in it ? !!)



Is there a loose (earth) wire hanging out the end of that cord and
therefore making it work like an everyday earth leakage unit ???

 

[Franc Zabkar]

On Thu, 05 May 2005 08:51:11 GMT, Dave Goldfinch
<daveg50_8@NotCoolMail.invalid> put finger to keyboard and composed:

That would seem to be a plausable explanation but what about if it was
built into a GPO ? There would be no way to sense the voltage on the
case or internal metal without an extra wire back to the GPO.

Perhaps this is why he claims that it 'could' be built into a GPO but
he hasn't done it yet - because it is impractical ?

But the ABC URL claims that he has built it "into a home’s electrical
power box or switch board", which amounts to the same thing. And if
you saw the demo you would have noticed that the device was external
to the appliance, so unless there was a third wire, there would have
been no way to sense the voltage on any metalwork ... as you have
said.

Here is some sketchy info:

http://www.ferret.com.au/articles/4c/0c02c74c.asp

"Protex is unique according to its manufacturer because it does not
rely on an earth to operate.

Protex is compatible with both ac and dc voltage from 12V dc to 415V
ac and works on all electrical equipment, whether Class 1, 2 or 3.
About the size of a matchbox and with minimal moving parts, the
switching technology can be readily incorporated into existing
electrical equipment."

There is a photo, but I'm not sure what it all means.


- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.

 

[Franc Zabkar]

On Thu, 5 May 2005 18:26:32 +1000, "Heywood Jablome" <reply to thread>
put finger to keyboard and composed:

I reckon its all a croc of shit. The only way to get electrocuted to death
if you have an RCD, is if you grab a neutral cable in one hand and an active
cable in another while standing on an insulated floor.

According to my reading of the info at the ABC website, Protex is
claimed to protect an individual should he simultaneously grab both A
and N conductors while being perfectly insulated from earth. Clearly
this is impossible.

The info is also contradictory:

"If a person comes into contact with the active and neutral conductors
while handling faulty plugs or appliances, the safety switch will not
detect this contact unless there is also an avenue for current to flow
to earth. The current flow to earth comes from 3-pinned appliances, or
what the industry refers to as class 1 appliances."

"If you use a 2 pin, non-earthed appliance you or your surroundings
have to become the connection to earth to make a safety switch
operate. The level of electricity that is likely to go through you
depends on your surroundings and the level of electricity flowing
through an appliance."


- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.

 

[Franc Zabkar]

On Fri, 06 May 2005 01:07:57 +1000, KLR <kenreed@yahoo.com> put finger
to keyboard and composed:

On Thu, 05 May 2005 08:45:01 +1000, Franc Zabkar
fzabkar@optussnet.com.au> wrote:

Did anybody see the New Inventors last night? Can anyone guess how
"Protex Switching Technology" works? The inventor said something about
detecting voltage changes, and using the neutral as the reference.

See http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1356442.htm


- Franc Zabkar


Go to this video (the link above in the OP's post ) - and take a look
^carefully^ at where he dunks the live light bulb/socket into the
tupperware container of water



If you look carefully - it appears to me to be a 3 pin moulded plug,
and the short length of cord its on also appears to be 3 core round
(about 7.5amp appliance cable)

(IE: it has an earth in it ? !!)



Is there a loose (earth) wire hanging out the end of that cord and
therefore making it work like an everyday earth leakage unit ???

Maybe the secret to the device is in its configurability? Perhaps it
is configured as a normal RCD for earthed 3-wire appliances, but uses
an extra wire in the case of 2-pin appliances to sense the voltage on
the metal parts.


- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Franc Zabkar"

Maybe the secret to the device is in its configurability? Perhaps it
is configured as a normal RCD for earthed 3-wire appliances, but uses
an extra wire in the case of 2-pin appliances to sense the voltage on
the metal parts.

** There is no evidence that the Protex device is an RCD - but IS a
voltage sensing trip just as claimed.

The version that uses three wires merely senses voltage on the earth wire
( having interrupted that wire by inserting an impedance) and hence current
flow in the earth wire. It likely trips at the usual 20 - 30 mA.

This, however, fails to work in situations where the current is flowing to
other than the AC supply earth wiring - so does NOT perform the safety
function for human life or fire protection that an RCD does.

Safety devices ( ie circuit breakers) that sense current flow in the supply
earth have been around for decades but are ( AFAIK ) only used in industrial
situations.




............ Phil

 

[Ross Herbert]

On Thu, 05 May 2005 08:45:01 +1000, Franc Zabkar
<fzabkar@optussnet.com.au> wrote:

Did anybody see the New Inventors last night? Can anyone guess how
"Protex Switching Technology" works? The inventor said something about
detecting voltage changes, and using the neutral as the reference.

See http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1356442.htm


- Franc Zabkar

Like yourself Franc, I was flabergasted when this so-called
:invention" came up on The New Inventors. The inventor sounded as
though he didn't have a clue about ac electricity or its mode of
operation in a domestic situation. Worse still, the panel were totally
clueless and seemed to respond purely from the point of "if it
promotes safety (apparently), then it must be good". And, if he really
wanted to demonstrate how safe the device was using his toaster
set-up, why didn't he actually poke a metal knife into the toaster
with his bare hand? Using a test switch to simulate such a case of
stupidity was a cop out as far as I was concerned.

Also, since the relevevant state electrical codes all require RCD's to
be fitted in the main distribution box of all new buildings on both
GPO and lighting circuits (have done for many years now), and there
are approved portable RCD devices and extension cords already on the
market, I can't see the rules changing to do away with them in favour
of Protex or even to add Protex in conjunction to an RCD. Frankly, I
can't see this device ever getting off the ground. I can't imagine the
inventor of ever convincing appliance manufacturers to actually
incorporate it into their products either and I can't see any
manufacturer agreeing to include it no matter how cheap it is. Just
imagine the situation where a toaster (for example) having one of
these devices in it, still managed to electrocute a user. The court
case would be interesting I think.

I tend to agree with Phil's assessment of the device's mode of
operation.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Ross Herbert"

Frankly, I
can't see this device ever getting off the ground. I can't imagine the
inventor of ever convincing appliance manufacturers to actually
incorporate it into their products either and I can't see any
manufacturer agreeing to include it no matter how cheap it is.

** Surely a hair dryer, shaver or heater that can boast complete safety
even when very wet or submerged has an edge marketers can use.

A phrase like " Bathroom and Kitchen Safe Appliance " might be used.

Folk are already aware of the danger posed by the sort of water related
accidents being referred to.


BTW:

RCDs may be installed now in all *new* premises - but so what ??

90 % of premises are old and do not have to have one !!!

In NSW one can fully renovate a premises, including rewiring and the
**NOT** have to fit an RCD - until this rule is changed a million older
houses, flats and units will NEVER get them.

I tend to agree with Phil's assessment of the device's mode of
operation.

** Just my "two cents" worth of surmising - you know.




............. Phil

 

[Ross Herbert]

On Fri, 6 May 2005 12:37:03 +1000, "Phil Allison"
<philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Ross Herbert"

Frankly, I
can't see this device ever getting off the ground. I can't imagine the
inventor of ever convincing appliance manufacturers to actually
incorporate it into their products either and I can't see any
manufacturer agreeing to include it no matter how cheap it is.


** Surely a hair dryer, shaver or heater that can boast complete safety
even when very wet or submerged has an edge marketers can use.

A phrase like " Bathroom and Kitchen Safe Appliance " might be used.

But this claim would tend to convince people that they would be
totally protected from electrocution and it would be difficult to
prove in practice. A manufacturer would be afraid of the litigation if
someone was electrocuted and he had a label saying "Bathroom and
Kitchen Safe" on his product. How does he guarantee that an insulation
breakdown or moisture ingress on the input side of the device can not
occur such that this claim would be compromised? That's why a court
case would be interesting. They would far prefer not to be involved in
the safety device aspects of electricity.

Folk are already aware of the danger posed by the sort of water related
accidents being referred to.


BTW:

RCDs may be installed now in all *new* premises - but so what ??

90 % of premises are old and do not have to have one !!!

True, but that's why I referred to the "portable" RCD items already on
the market. I accept that the user must make a pro-active decision to
actually use one of these however, and they might simply forget to. A
permanently wired safety device is preferable of course, but I would
predict that Protex will produce so many false trippings that it will
be like the boy who cried wolf and people will probably disconnect
them.

In NSW one can fully renovate a premises, including rewiring and the
**NOT** have to fit an RCD - until this rule is changed a million older
houses, flats and units will NEVER get them.

Different states have different rules. In WA any old house (pre RCD)
being renovated and having new electrical work performed has to have
the main switchboard upgraded to include RCD's. At least that's what
my electrician told me back in '95 when I did some major renovations.

I tend to agree with Phil's assessment of the device's mode of
operation.


** Just my "two cents" worth of surmising - you know.

But you also have some valued technical knowledge which makes sense.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Ross Herbert"
Phil Allison

Frankly, I
can't see this device ever getting off the ground. I can't imagine the
inventor of ever convincing appliance manufacturers to actually
incorporate it into their products either and I can't see any
manufacturer agreeing to include it no matter how cheap it is.


** Surely a hair dryer, shaver or heater that can boast complete safety
even when very wet or submerged has an edge marketers can use.

A phrase like " Bathroom and Kitchen Safe Appliance " might be used.


But this claim would tend to convince people that they would be
totally protected from electrocution and it would be difficult to
prove in practice.

** Optimists misconstrue all the time - but the law does not back them
up.

A manufacturer would be afraid of the litigation if
someone was electrocuted and he had a label saying "Bathroom and
Kitchen Safe" on his product.

** All product makes have Liability Insurance - long as the claim is not
false or misleading they are covered.

How does he guarantee that an insulation
breakdown or moisture ingress on the input side of the device can not
occur such that this claim would be compromised?

** The claim merely refers to the existence of the safety trip device.
There are recognised standards for water proofing and insulation that if
complied with protect a maker from blame. Certainly the cable, its
anchoring and the device need to be waterproof - this is the product
maker's job to get right and get type approved.

The Protex apparently has no safety approvals at present - it is a non
starter until it has got them. However, it would be wrong to assume it is
not possible.

BTW:

RCDs may be installed now in all *new* premises - but so what ??

90 % of premises are old and do not have to have one !!!

True, but that's why I referred to the "portable" RCD items already on
the market.

** But they are NOT being widely used in homes and nor are ever likely to
be.

One cannot claim that RCDs are already providing adequate protection to the
Australian public.

I accept that the user must make a pro-active decision to
actually use one of these however, and they might simply forget to.

** Huh ?? Forget to ??

A permanently wired safety device is preferable of course,

** But in millions of domestic premises it is simply NOT there and will not
be in the foreseeable future.

but I would
predict that Protex will produce so many false trippings that it will
be like the boy who cried wolf and people will probably disconnect
them.

** You need to explain this "prediction" - it a brand new one.

In NSW one can fully renovate a premises, including rewiring and the
**NOT** have to fit an RCD - until this rule is changed a million older
houses, flats and units will NEVER get them.


Different states have different rules.
In WA any old house (pre RCD)
being renovated and having new electrical work performed has to have
the main switchboard upgraded to include RCD's. At least that's what
my electrician told me back in '95 when I did some major renovations.

** In QLD, when premises change ownership an RCD must be fitted - at
least this ensures statewide RCD protection in the next 20 years or so.

But whatever the case - there are still millions of unprotected premises.

One cannot claim that RCDs are already providing adequate protection to the
Australian public.




.............. Phil

 

[Ross Herbert]

On Fri, 6 May 2005 13:44:02 +1000, "Phil Allison"
<philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Ross Herbert"
Phil Allison

Frankly, I
can't see this device ever getting off the ground. I can't imagine the
inventor of ever convincing appliance manufacturers to actually
incorporate it into their products either and I can't see any
manufacturer agreeing to include it no matter how cheap it is.


** Surely a hair dryer, shaver or heater that can boast complete safety
even when very wet or submerged has an edge marketers can use.

A phrase like " Bathroom and Kitchen Safe Appliance " might be used.


But this claim would tend to convince people that they would be
totally protected from electrocution and it would be difficult to
prove in practice.


** Optimists misconstrue all the time - but the law does not back them
up.

I can see where this is going so I don't intend to respond further.


SNIP

 

[Phil Allison]

"Ross Herbert"
"Phil Allison"

I can see where this is going so I don't intend to respond further.

** When digging oneself into bottomless pit - it is wise to know when to
stop.




............... Phil

 

[Franc Zabkar]

On Fri, 06 May 2005 02:09:31 GMT, Ross Herbert
<rherber1SPAMEX@bigpond.net.au> put finger to keyboard and composed:

On Thu, 05 May 2005 08:45:01 +1000, Franc Zabkar
fzabkar@optussnet.com.au> wrote:

Did anybody see the New Inventors last night? Can anyone guess how
"Protex Switching Technology" works? The inventor said something about
detecting voltage changes, and using the neutral as the reference.

See http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1356442.htm


- Franc Zabkar


Like yourself Franc, I was flabergasted when this so-called
:invention" came up on The New Inventors. The inventor sounded as
though he didn't have a clue about ac electricity or its mode of
operation in a domestic situation.

My overall feeling at the time was one of frustration. Very little
info was divulged, and the demo wasn't explained very well. Since then
I've become even more frustrated by the seemingly contradictory info
on the ABC's web page. The inventor's annoying website did nothing to
help matters, either. It seems he is being deliberately vague and
overprotective.

Worse still, the panel were totally
clueless and seemed to respond purely from the point of "if it
promotes safety (apparently), then it must be good". And, if he really
wanted to demonstrate how safe the device was using his toaster
set-up, why didn't he actually poke a metal knife into the toaster
with his bare hand? Using a test switch to simulate such a case of
stupidity was a cop out as far as I was concerned.

I wouldn't have expected him to do that, although I would have liked
some indication as to the sensitivity of the device. One question I
would have asked was, how does the Protex compare with an ELCB that
trips at 30mA?

Also, since the relevevant state electrical codes all require RCD's to
be fitted in the main distribution box of all new buildings on both
GPO and lighting circuits (have done for many years now), and there
are approved portable RCD devices and extension cords already on the
market, I can't see the rules changing to do away with them in favour
of Protex or even to add Protex in conjunction to an RCD. Frankly, I
can't see this device ever getting off the ground.

I could see it being integrated into some bathroom and kitchen
appliances. And after seeing the demo with the submerged light, I'm
reminded of the time rainwater filled the light fitting in my rented
house.

I can't imagine the
inventor of ever convincing appliance manufacturers to actually
incorporate it into their products either and I can't see any
manufacturer agreeing to include it no matter how cheap it is. Just
imagine the situation where a toaster (for example) having one of
these devices in it, still managed to electrocute a user. The court
case would be interesting I think.

I tend to agree with Phil's assessment of the device's mode of
operation.

Yeah, it looks that way. But how do you explain the claim that the
device could be fitted to existing meter boxes? Would the device be
protecting appliances within the house, or would it be detecting water
in the meter box itself?

I would also question whether static electricity could trip the
device. Still another problem could be appliances like my 2-pin TV
where the 0V reference on the DC side of the circuit is connected to
AC via a high impedance RC combo. I sometimes see a spark, or feel a
tingle, when interconnecting such appliances.


- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.