A Compromised Reasoning Ability

Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?

As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
instances.

In some instances some people don't need a PC.

You think that was a bad invention too?

Non sequitur

Again, do you think an invention is only worthwhile if it's the only
thing everyone will ever need?

Your basic reasoning ability is screwed up so any "calculations" are a
complete farce.


Bret Cahill


"A popular government without popular information or the means of
acquiring it, is only a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy; or perhaps
both."

-- Madison (1822)

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:

Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?

As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
instances.

In some instances some people don't need a PC.

You think that was a bad invention too?

Non sequitur

Again, do you think an invention is only worthwhile if it's the only
thing everyone will ever need?

---
Red herring.
---

Your basic reasoning ability is screwed up so any "calculations" are a
complete farce.

---
The problem with you is that you don't understand mathematics, so you
can't see that reason is entrained in a set of equations which lead,
logically, from a premise to a proof.

Either that or you're so unwilling to accept that your hare-brained
idea was proven to be flawed that you're willing to go to
extraordinary lengths to try to make your denial of the truth seem
valid.
---

"A popular government without popular information or the means of
acquiring it, is only a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy; or perhaps
both."

-- Madison (1822)

---
Too bad you can't come up with something of your own, huh?


JF

 

[z]

On Aug 1, 1:35 pm, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:

Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
instances.
In some instances some people don't need a PC.

who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.

 

On Aug 1, 12:29 pm, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:

On Aug 1, 1:35 pm, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:

Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
instances.
In some instances some people don't need a PC.

who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.

You just have to learn the right programming tricks.

 

[m II]

z wrote:

who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.

Actually, if it weren't for the rocks, we would get more of them.

http://www.johndarwell.com/projects/s_nsfh3/index.php?i=11



mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

 

[m II]

Kris Krieger wrote:

m II <c@in.the.hat> wrote in news:jb%kk.3639$nu6.3165@edtnps83:

z wrote:

who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.

Actually, if it weren't for the rocks, we would get more of them.

http://www.johndarwell.com/projects/s_nsfh3/index.php?i=11

Heh

What's with the traffic cone BTW - was it that "done up" that way and put
there by the sea/weather...? Strange thing, that.

It seems to be a tribute to our stewardship of the planet.



mike

--
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \/ /\ \/This space for rent/\ \/ /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/

ŠDensa International
'Think tanks cleaned cheap'

Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

 

[Bret Cahill]

Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?

As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
instances.

In some instances some people don't need a PC.

You think that was a bad invention too?

Non sequitur

Again, do you think an invention is only worthwhile if it's the only
thing everyone will ever need?

---
Red herring.

Do you deny that it's possible for an invention to have some uses but
not others?

Every time you dodge the question I roll up the newspaper and pop it
again.

It's just like training a puppy.


Bret Cahill