9V 1A schematic needed

[Active8]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:40:04 GMT, J-vibe wrote:

I was responding to Jim and his mention that he is "retired" age, but plans
not to retire.
Look Fred, I'm not going to lie and bullshit you. I am a very technical
person. I don't need
to prove to you anything, but since you are convinced that I am sooooo
clueless about
technical things, I design and program software that moves money...and lots
of it for
investment firms, banks, insurance and lien holders.
snip

I'm curious. Who are the morons that write the sofware that does
this:

I've left out of town jobs and just withdrew whatever money was left
in the bank or wrote a check to my permanent account. I may leave a
few pennies. The bank decides to charge a service fee each month for
being below the minimun balance. The account goes negative and the
program charges a fee for non-sufficient funds. Then I can't open an
account elsewhere until I wake them up.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:03:07 GMT, J-vibe wrote:

<snip>

Let me explain the sequence:

1FAA 0010 , 11F1A2 021101, 12F111A122 0121120111, What the next sequence?

The first set is the source:
1FAA 0010

The second set is thinking out of the box, so it's literally telling you
what the source has
1 for 1, F for 1, A for 2, 0 for 2, 1 for 1, 0 for 1

The third set does the same, now based on the second set:
1 for 2, F for 1, 1 for 1, etc....

Ken was right:
One posible answer is:

1121F113A11122 012112210113

Is there a name for this type of compression algorithm? I vaguely
remember something like this. Not much different from a
(hypothetical, or just a piss poor desciption of mpeg) scheme I read
about for compressing homogenous areas of a video frame.

Thanks in advance for your help.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:29:21 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:24:34 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:55:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:48:33 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:12:03 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

(1) I doubt seriously if Fred HAS a wife, but he is, at the very
minimum, mentally deranged.

(2) I resent your mis-use of the term "Old Timer"... a great many of
the posters here are Old Timers... I just passed the conventional age
of retirement in the US, but have no intent of ever retiring.

---
You kids...

Now John, IIRC you're just a year or so older then I am. (If you're
having trouble with the math I just did my 16-1/4 birthday (base 4

---
On 29 Feb?

'Tweren't any this year, that's why the 1/4 ;-)

I thought it was 26 Feb.

--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Larry Brasfield]

"J-vibe" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:KaP_d.12394$oO4.8776@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...

It's amazing how moronic & pathetic some people can be.

Yes, it surely is.

Don't be upset at me for your failure to understand my question.

You misunderstand. I am not in the least bit upset.
I am disappointed that you take Fred's assertion
that I had no clue at face value. Perhaps, if you
read the 2nd-to-last sentence in my retry with
care, you will understand that there was a clue.
However, I will admit that my notion of what
you were after was extremely vague, as would
be natural given your question.

I urge you to read this next paragraph, quoted from
my post (but cut from yours as seemingly insignificant)
with more care. Be aware also that I attempted to
find your email address in your posts, to provide a
clearer indication of my intent, but could not find it
in either plain or munged form. Quoting:
To the OP: Please be patient with my efforts to
please the infinitely exaltable Fred Bloggs. He sets
such an inimitably high standard by example with
his wise and kind posts that others can hope for
only the most excrescential results in comparison.
I am not going to decode that for you, but I assure
you that there is a more benign message there for you.

I never even said a single thing to offend you.

Agreed, at least up until a few lines above.

Obviously your lack of confidence and ability to
deal with Fred's insult led you to concur that my question was the reason
why you got attacked.

If you were to read the bulk of Fred's posts over
the last few weeks, I think you would agree that
being attacked by Fred is an honor, not anything
to feel bad about or wonder how recover from.

I am convinced that the reason for Fred attacks
lies in the twisted mind of Fred himself and so I
never could imagine that you are to blame for it.

Why did you give in to such sucker-bait? Reading your response exposed your
weaknesses and lack of maturity.

I think you need to read more posts here to
understand. If you are as intelligent as I hope,
that should do the trick.

You are a socially unstable individual.

I have not killed anybody yet and have many
friends I have known for most of my life. My
family is intact and they all seem glad to see me.

To the rest of the people in this forum reading this, I apologize for Larry
and this uncalled for posting.

No need for your apology, since it appears
you are the only innocent person offended.

I hope you will accept my apology for not
anticipating your superficial interpretation.

I appreciate all your help and understanding that
many of you at one point in your life, crawled before you walked.

Thanks for your help!

I'm glad you got what you wanted. Now, ask
yourself "Why did Larry answer my first post
in the manner he did?" and "How, as a socially
unstable individual, could he have elicited my
thanks and a reformulated question without
offending me in any way whatsoever?"

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
Above views may belong only to me.

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote (in <1tqlrx73frjuz.dlg@ID-222894.news.individual.net&gt about '9V
1A schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

I'm curious. Who are the morons that write the sofware that does this:

I've left out of town jobs and just withdrew whatever money was left in
the bank or wrote a check to my permanent account.

I may leave a few
pennies. The bank decides to charge a service fee each month for being
below the minimun balance. The account goes negative and the program
charges a fee for non-sufficient funds. Then I can't open an account
elsewhere until I wake them up.

I don't know what happens in USA, but you could get the same aggro in UK
if you wrote a cheque instead of instructing the bank to 'close the
account and transfer the funds to ...'. That way, the account is erased
from the computer, so it can't send you daft messages (probably).
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[fuclarence]

Clarence_A wrote:

"John Larkin" wrote

Fred Bloggs wrote:


In the case of the OP292 thread, the motivation was to make a

dead

certain diagnosis of the Nazi Clarence and his problem- and

that is what

I did- also ordered some OP292's and played around with it some

more.

But you go ahead with your trumped up bullshit claiming to

understand

someone's motivation- and your PhD in Psychoanalysis is from

where?

There is a name for your kind of sickness where you *know* what

people

are thinking-pathetic.


You actually ordered parts and built circuits to prove somebody

from a

newsgroup to be wrong? That's pushing the top range of the
getalifeometer!



Yes that is pretty strange for even Fred and he is as strange as
they come.

The problem has been verified by Analog devices and the alternate
circuit with the diodes to assure equal amplitude are in place.
The Brass board is in the hands of the customer and the final PCB
layout is complete for the first build. The unit now works as
intended.

BTW, I killfiled FRED ages ago, so I never see him unless someone
replies to his inane rambling.

Once again- you are a good-for-nothing Nazi liar, a pathetic little
poser who couldn't even understand opamp 101, came on the NG lying about
breadboarding something when in fact all you had done was run a half
assed simulation on a SPICE freebie. You are a good-for-nothing p.o.s.
and I can't think of single person who wants you posting here,
plonk-and-run girlie man.

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:23:47 +0000, John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote (in <1tqlrx73frjuz.dlg@ID-222894.news.individual.net&gt about '9V
1A schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

I'm curious. Who are the morons that write the sofware that does this:

I've left out of town jobs and just withdrew whatever money was left in
the bank or wrote a check to my permanent account.

I may leave a few
pennies. The bank decides to charge a service fee each month for being
below the minimun balance. The account goes negative and the program
charges a fee for non-sufficient funds. Then I can't open an account
elsewhere until I wake them up.

I don't know what happens in USA, but you could get the same aggro in UK
if you wrote a cheque instead of instructing the bank to 'close the
account and transfer the funds to ...'. That way, the account is erased
from the computer, so it can't send you daft messages (probably).

I use mail forwarding services and nothing ever gets addressed to my
out of town addr except the temporary stuff. I'd never get the daft
messages. What happens is they report you to Check Systems which
makes it look like you wrote a bad check and owe the bank. So other
banks won't let you open an account. I wouldn't bitch if I really
had written a bad check.

The reason I didn't close the account is because of the bad taste
left in my mouth in the past. They want to see all checks that
haven't cleared, meaning that if you don't save any voided checks,
they can't account for them and won't close the account.

I'd love to find a better solution, but for now, I save every voided
check.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Fred Bloggs]

J-vibe wrote:

I know - he is such a clueless moron- so typical of these bit heads-
without constraints, the sequence cannot possibly be unique. j_vibe is
your typical programmer moron.


Freddy,

Don't get upset, you know haow bad it affects you ulcers and vericose viens.
Let me explain the sequence:

1FAA 0010 , 11F1A2 021101, 12F111A122 0121120111, What the next sequence?

The first set is the source:
1FAA 0010

The second set is thinking out of the box, so it's literally telling you
what the source has
1 for 1, F for 1, A for 2, 0 for 2, 1 for 1, 0 for 1

The third set does the same, now based on the second set:
1 for 2, F for 1, 1 for 1, etc....

Ken was right:

One posible answer is:

1121F113A11122 012112210113



I know - he is such a clueless moron- so typical of these bit heads-

without constraints, the sequence cannot possibly be unique. j_vibe is
your typical programmer moron.


Who's the clueless moron now Freddy? Ha Ha!!!!!

You're just a little pussy girlie type playing "guess what I'm holding
behind my back"- this is so typical of you low mentality types who
otherwise would be a server in a cafeteria somewhere. Can you handle a
16 character alphabet? Aren't you so cerebral. Like I said before, you
are in a low end niche market, get it while you can, your skill set is
limited, and you will soon become obsolete.

PS I wasted no time at all working on your puzzle, pussy boy. Ha Ha Ha ....

 

[Fred Bloggs]

J-vibe wrote:

Correct! You are the man!
Fred could not even understand where to begin. He was busy counting his
toes.



A congrats will have to do or I could get you tickets to amateur comedy
night show starring Fred Blogger?
Ignore Fred, he's mad at me because I outwit him everytime and he can't get
under my skin.
I'm actually starting to like that old misfit..... Share some of your love
Freddy! Give Ken a taste of
your comdey show routine. Go for it, the stage is yours:

You're just a little pussy girlie type playing "guess what I'm holding
behind my back"- this is so typical of you low mentality types who
otherwise would be a server in a cafeteria somewhere. Can you handle a
16 character alphabet? Aren't you so cerebral. Like I said before, you
are in a low end niche market, get it while you can, your skill set is
limited, and you will soon become obsolete.

PS I wasted no time at all working on your puzzle, pussy boy. Ha Ha Ha ....

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:09:50 -0500, Active8 wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:03:07 GMT, J-vibe wrote:

snip
Let me explain the sequence:

1FAA 0010 , 11F1A2 021101, 12F111A122 0121120111, What the next sequence?

The first set is the source:
1FAA 0010

The second set is thinking out of the box, so it's literally telling you
what the source has
1 for 1, F for 1, A for 2, 0 for 2, 1 for 1, 0 for 1

The third set does the same, now based on the second set:
1 for 2, F for 1, 1 for 1, etc....

Ken was right:
One posible answer is:

1121F113A11122 012112210113

Is there a name for this type of compression algorithm? I vaguely
remember something like this. Not much different from a
(hypothetical, or just a piss poor desciption of mpeg) scheme I read
about for compressing homogenous areas of a video frame.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Someone mentioned run-length. Is it an RLL sequence? That's
something else lost in the cobwebs, but it sounds right.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote (in <8q2dr65mygli.dlg@ID-222894.news.individual.net&gt about '9V 1A
schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

The reason I didn't close the account is because of the bad taste left
in my mouth in the past. They want to see all checks that haven't
cleared, meaning that if you don't save any voided checks, they can't
account for them and won't close the account.

Our banks are utterly mad, but that surpasses! You close the account,
and later someone tries to present a cheque, they should 'refer to
drawer'.

I'd love to find a better solution, but for now, I save every voided
check.

Well, yes, so do I, but that's for my own accountant's benefit.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:11:51 +0000, John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote (in <8q2dr65mygli.dlg@ID-222894.news.individual.net&gt about '9V 1A
schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

The reason I didn't close the account is because of the bad taste left
in my mouth in the past. They want to see all checks that haven't
cleared, meaning that if you don't save any voided checks, they can't
account for them and won't close the account.

Our banks are utterly mad, but that surpasses! You close the account,
and later someone tries to present a cheque, they should 'refer to
drawer'.

Yeah. Maybe that was just my luck to have to deal with a moron at
what should have been a bank with a better plan. I jsut joined a
credit union and a new teller amazed me with her product knowlege,
She signed me up at the window and knew the answers to my question.
I think I dreamt of her. No service fees either. I always ask if
they'll charge me into the red and they act as if it could never
happen. I hate this small area.

I could go on but insert ranting diatribe here and imagine my
frustration.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:40:15 GMT, fuclarence wrote:

Clarence_A wrote:
"John Larkin" wrote

Fred Bloggs wrote:


In the case of the OP292 thread, the motivation was to make a

dead

certain diagnosis of the Nazi Clarence and his problem- and

that is what

I did- also ordered some OP292's and played around with it some

more.

But you go ahead with your trumped up bullshit claiming to

understand

someone's motivation- and your PhD in Psychoanalysis is from

where?

There is a name for your kind of sickness where you *know* what

people

are thinking-pathetic.


You actually ordered parts and built circuits to prove somebody

from a

newsgroup to be wrong? That's pushing the top range of the
getalifeometer!


Yes that is pretty strange for even Fred and he is as strange as
they come.

The problem has been verified by Analog devices and the alternate
circuit with the diodes to assure equal amplitude are in place.
The Brass board is in the hands of the customer and the final PCB
layout is complete for the first build. The unit now works as
intended.

BTW, I killfiled FRED ages ago, so I never see him unless someone
replies to his inane rambling.


Once again- you are a good-for-nothing Nazi liar, a pathetic little
poser who couldn't even understand opamp 101, came on the NG lying about
breadboarding something when in fact all you had done was run a half
assed simulation on a SPICE freebie. You are a good-for-nothing p.o.s.
and I can't think of single person who wants you posting here,
plonk-and-run girlie man.

Looks like he can't spec a 3-term regulator either.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:26:43 -0800, Ron Hubbard wrote:

"J-vibe" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:y9L_d.7741$qW.235@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I'll try again.....

I need to build a power supply unit where I can take 120V AC from a
U.S.
home outlet and convert it to a 9 Volt DC 1Amp output.

120V AC 9V DC 1 AMP
---------> Converts to +--------
---------> (-) -------

Here is an example, but I need to build my own because I need to
design it
to fit exactly the way I need it
inside my project:
http://shop.vetcosurplus.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=872


Here's an idea: buy 12 volt xformer with no center tap. Connect to it a
small bridge diode rectifier rated for 2 amps or higher, and to that a
large value capacitor such as 470 uF or greater rated up to 35 volts or
higher. Follow that by a 9 volt regulator such as the LM7905 voltage
regulator chip (may need a heat sink for that). The whole thing will
take up very little space but will give you about 9.1 volts DC with
pretty fair regulation and low ripple. This is pretty much basic,
Electronics 101, kind of stuff.

And so is the fact that the 7905 is a -5V regulator. As well as the
fact that a first guess at Pd for the 7809 is about 6.6W - sounds
like a heatsink begging to be spec'd. Peak current of 1A exceeds the
7809 spec. LM78M09 at 1A is only marginally guaranteed if Tj is 25 C
giving a theta_JA of zero for 25 C ambient which would require an
impossibly large fictitional heatsink with negative theta_CA.

--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:24:55 +0100, Frank Bemelman wrote:

"Larry Brasfield" <donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:AeQ_d.72$VW.1049@news.uswest.net...
"Mac" <foo@bar.net> wrote in message
newsan.2005.03.19.06.34.43.492155@bar.net...
But he does seem to know what he is talking about when he
talks electronics.

As far as I can see, that is clearly an
overstatement. Fred can make inane
mistakes, like anybody else, but does
so by plunging into certain subjects

Nah, he's the first one to post follow-ups if he spots a
silly mistake or sees a way to improve or simplify things.

He even improves his own answers. And I've seen him crank out
answers (I didn't time him as Larry did) ... scratch that. I never
got the impression he needed to run and research prior to replying.
I sometimes have to do that because I don't have the experience to
do it blindfolded or remember some of the stuff I've learned.

Fred's motivations and political opinions don't matter to me except
for the time he did my work for me. But I just went ahead and did my
math and checked my answer.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Chris]

"Fred Bloggs" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:423C9072.3020802@nospam.com...

Larry Brasfield wrote:
[...snip garbage...]
You haven't done a f_ucking thing, pseudo-intellectual- you stopped
short because you're a f_ucking phony piece of loudmouthed trash-
spewing a bunch of 4ktrb trash. What is clear is that you are a sorry
assed sack of shit NG troll.

Fred, you're running out of ammo, scroll down here and get some more

http://members.iinet.net.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:59:54 -0500, Active8 wrote:

Looks like he can't spec a 3-term regulator either.

Opps! It was L Ron Hubbard.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Active8 wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:59:54 -0500, Active8 wrote:


Looks like he can't spec a 3-term regulator either.


Opps! It was L Ron Hubbard.

LOL- the 7905 guy...

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Chris wrote:

"Fred Bloggs" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:423C9072.3020802@nospam.com...


Larry Brasfield wrote:
[...snip garbage...]
You haven't done a f_ucking thing, pseudo-intellectual- you stopped
short because you're a f_ucking phony piece of loudmouthed trash-
spewing a bunch of 4ktrb trash. What is clear is that you are a sorry
assed sack of shit NG troll.



Fred, you're running out of ammo, scroll down here and get some more

http://members.iinet.net.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

I don't waste time playing games with these smart-mouthed trolls like
Larry Brasfield. In order to keep the response time to 100ms or less, I
first scan the post for any technical content whatsoever by looking for
words like noise, gain, level etc...this takes no time because there are
none. Failing this preliminary test, I snip the whole mass of worthless
gibberish and paste in the main response which succinctly states he
should get to the technical gist of the thread or just shut up and go
away. I refuse to waste any time decoding any type of subjective and off
topic idiocy coming from that deranged nobody- he sticks to the
technical topic or gets slapped-period.

 

[Active8]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:18:27 GMT, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Active8 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:59:54 -0500, Active8 wrote:


Looks like he can't spec a 3-term regulator either.

Opps! It was L Ron Hubbard.

LOL- the 7905 guy...

Yeah. I'm 2 sheets to the wind now, but I think I got the math
right. Check me?

I'm looking forward to the 40 kHz thread. I blew it off before. If
I'd just have expanded it... I see that troll lemon juice has cycled
(as in period) back in to the NG.
--
Best Regards,
Mike