30 amp transfer circuit for a small generator

Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!

JF
 
Always! I have never stop supporting sane techniques.

Do you always have to add so many useless characters and waste bandwidth
when you bottom feed? I bet you love the confusion it generates.

I would even venture to say I bet you actually have a special reader to
assist you to sort out the bottom posting confusion.



"Don Klipstein" <don@manx.misty.com> wrote in message
news:slrnicbldn.a6v.don@manx.misty.com...
Top-posting again, or still? (I suspect the latter)



In article <mDjxo.20374$xe3.13290@newsfe02.iad>, Josepi wrote largely:
Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.




"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!
 
In article <mDjxo.20374$xe3.13290@newsfe02.iad>, Josepi wrote largely:
Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!
Click to expand...
Top-posting again, or still? (I suspect the latter)
--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
 
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:02:51 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com>
wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!

JF
Click to expand...
---
An erroneously (or malevolentltly) top-posted post follows which was
repaired by bottom-posting it in order to preserve the natural
chronological order of events.
---

Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.
Click to expand...
---
Piss off, you supercilious ass.

That post was a forgery, so let's talk about something else for a
while, OK?

Why do you persist in top-posting when all it does is create
confusion?

Unless you're terminally stupid you must realize that we read from
left to right and from top to bottom, with the beginning of the book
occurring first and the end occurring at, well, the end, not the
beginning.

Since it's obvious that you're not _terminally_ stupid, your continued
top-posting reflects the disdain you have for the other members of
these groups who have asked you, more than once, I'm sure, to do what
Romans do, when you're in Rome.

Your refusal, since you can offer no rational proof of top-posting's
superiority, smacks of narcissistic self-indulgence and all you'll do
by persisting with your perversion is alienating those who might
support you.

I'm certainly not impressed with your rather banal, smartass, 17 post
record on sed, especially with your: "Here, let me make it as
difficult for you as I possibly can to measure Zener diode reverse
breakdown voltage"

Ultimately, the decision to post the way the overwhelming majority of
us does is yours, and if you choose not to you'll more than likely be
handed short shrift.

---
JF
 
OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

See ya, toiletboy.


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ujvbc6d4qpn9sgqrg3mpv36o1qeqpk9lhh@4ax.com...
---
An erroneously (or malevolentltly) top-posted post follows which was
repaired by bottom-posting it in order to preserve the natural
chronological order of events.
---
Piss off, you supercilious ass.

That post was a forgery, so let's talk about something else for a
while, OK?

Why do you persist in top-posting when all it does is create
confusion?

Unless you're terminally stupid you must realize that we read from
left to right and from top to bottom, with the beginning of the book
occurring first and the end occurring at, well, the end, not the
beginning.

Since it's obvious that you're not _terminally_ stupid, your continued
top-posting reflects the disdain you have for the other members of
these groups who have asked you, more than once, I'm sure, to do what
Romans do, when you're in Rome.

Your refusal, since you can offer no rational proof of top-posting's
superiority, smacks of narcissistic self-indulgence and all you'll do
by persisting with your perversion is alienating those who might
support you.

I'm certainly not impressed with your rather banal, smartass, 17 post
record on sed, especially with your: "Here, let me make it as
difficult for you as I possibly can to measure Zener diode reverse
breakdown voltage"

Ultimately, the decision to post the way the overwhelming majority of
us does is yours, and if you choose not to you'll more than likely be
handed short shrift.

---



On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:02:51 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com> wrote:
Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.




"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!

JF
 
On Oct 25, 4:41 pm, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:
OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.
Click to expand...
LOOK, ASSWIPE! YOU have NO business discussing ANYTHING
about how Usenet works, much less what is or is not proper, you
stupid, inconsiderate FUCKTARD!

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?
Click to expand...
Is there EVER a time when your "total asswipe" factor is not a mere
tenth
of a point under that of Proteus?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.
Click to expand...
No, IDIOT! YOU DO NOT get it. THAT IS THE POINT.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.
Click to expand...
Please fuck off and die, you 11 year old maturity depth dumbfuck.
You are the kind of twit that needs MORE than mere killing via
filtration.

See ya, toiletboy.
Click to expand...
No, josepi, the retarded, immature little wuss... you won't.

I take it back. You equal the stupidity level of proteus.
 
On Oct 25, 7:41 pm, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:
OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

See ya, toiletboy.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:ujvbc6d4qpn9sgqrg3mpv36o1qeqpk9lhh@4ax.com...
---
An erroneously (or malevolentltly) top-posted post follows which was
repaired by bottom-posting it in order to preserve the natural
chronological order of events.
---
Piss off, you supercilious ass.

That post was a forgery, so let's talk about something else for a
while, OK?

Why do you persist in top-posting when all it does is create
confusion?

Unless you're terminally stupid you must realize that we read from
left to right and from top to bottom, with the beginning of the book
occurring first and the end occurring at, well, the end, not the
beginning.

Since it's obvious that you're not _terminally_ stupid, your continued
top-posting reflects the disdain you have for the other members of
these groups who have asked you, more than once, I'm sure, to do what
Romans do, when you're in Rome.

Your refusal, since you can offer no rational proof of top-posting's
superiority, smacks of narcissistic self-indulgence and all you'll do
by persisting with your perversion is alienating those who might
support you.

I'm certainly not impressed with your rather banal, smartass, 17 post
record on sed, especially with your: "Here, let me make it as
difficult for you as I possibly can to measure Zener diode reverse
breakdown voltage"

Ultimately, the decision to post the way the overwhelming majority of
us does is yours, and if you choose not to you'll more than likely be
handed short shrift.

---

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:02:51 -0400, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:

Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!

JF
Click to expand...
YOUR HOUSE IS DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF
IT SHALL FALL

I AM PROTEUS
 
On Oct 25, 9:44 pm, WallyWallWhackr <gonna_get_you_...@cox.net> wrote:
On Oct 25, 4:41 pm, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:

OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

  LOOK, ASSWIPE!  YOU have NO business discussing ANYTHING
about how Usenet works, much less what is or is not proper, you
stupid, inconsiderate FUCKTARD!

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?

  Is there EVER a time when your "total asswipe" factor is not a mere
tenth
of a point under that of Proteus?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it..
It's the "torturing yourself" part.

  No, IDIOT!  YOU DO NOT get it.  THAT IS THE POINT.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

  Please fuck off and die, you 11 year old maturity depth dumbfuck.
You are the kind of twit that needs MORE than mere killing via
filtration.

See ya, toiletboy.

  No, josepi, the retarded, immature little wuss...  you won't.

  I take it back.  You equal the stupidity level of proteus.
Click to expand...
ONE AND THE SAME
PATHETIC UNREAL TEMPORAL SELF DESTRUCTIVE
YOU ARE A FRAUD

I AM PROTEUS
 
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:41:23 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com>
wrote:

OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.
Click to expand...
---
"taught about"???
---

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?
Click to expand...
---
I don't recall having killfiled you, but I did catch the stench.
---

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.
Click to expand...
---
Yeah, you're right.

There's been nothing of substances in any of your posts, so slogging
through them, particularly since they're chronologically out of order
is, while not torture, at least disappointing.

I should probably stop.
---

Please return it to the natural state...killed.
Click to expand...
---
Sorry, but no.

I very rarely killfile anyone, especially the self-admitted
top-posting idiots whom I like to take pot-shots at occasionally.

---
JF
 
Is this a killfiltering speed contest?

You can go first, anytime. Your responses were only a small irritant to me
and many others.

BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this
thread. Grow up.


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:dcfdc6lljvs7pf9rg9aspm0kju3if96vrp@4ax.com...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:41:23 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com>
wrote:

OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.
Click to expand...
---
"taught about"???
---

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?
Click to expand...
---
I don't recall having killfiled you, but I did catch the stench.
---

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.
Click to expand...
---
Yeah, you're right.

There's been nothing of substances in any of your posts, so slogging
through them, particularly since they're chronologically out of order
is, while not torture, at least disappointing.

I should probably stop.
---

Please return it to the natural state...killed.
Click to expand...
---
Sorry, but no.

I very rarely killfile anyone, especially the self-admitted
top-posting idiots whom I like to take pot-shots at occasionally.

---
JF
 
On Oct 25, 7:41 pm, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:
OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

See ya, toiletboy.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:ujvbc6d4qpn9sgqrg3mpv36o1qeqpk9lhh@4ax.com...
---
An erroneously (or malevolentltly) top-posted post follows which was
repaired by bottom-posting it in order to preserve the natural
chronological order of events.
---
Piss off, you supercilious ass.

That post was a forgery, so let's talk about something else for a
while, OK?

Why do you persist in top-posting when all it does is create
confusion?

Unless you're terminally stupid you must realize that we read from
left to right and from top to bottom, with the beginning of the book
occurring first and the end occurring at, well, the end, not the
beginning.

Since it's obvious that you're not _terminally_ stupid, your continued
top-posting reflects the disdain you have for the other members of
these groups who have asked you, more than once, I'm sure, to do what
Romans do, when you're in Rome.

Your refusal, since you can offer no rational proof of top-posting's
superiority, smacks of narcissistic self-indulgence and all you'll do
by persisting with your perversion is alienating those who might
support you.

I'm certainly not impressed with your rather banal, smartass, 17 post
record on sed, especially with your: "Here, let me make it as
difficult for you as I possibly can to measure Zener diode reverse
breakdown voltage"

Ultimately, the decision to post the way the overwhelming majority of
us does is yours, and if you choose not to you'll more than likely be
handed short shrift.

---

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:02:51 -0400, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:

Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Flush!

JF
Click to expand...
JOHN FEELS YOU JOSEPIPI
YOU SHOULD CRAWFISH HIM IN HIS FAGGOTY INTERESTED ANUS
HE IS A DIRTY LOW DOWN SCUMSUCKER
AND MICHAEL TERRELL TOLD ME HE SWALLOWS
I AM PROTEUS
 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:53:50 -0400 "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com> wrote in
Message id: <9YBxo.419$8m.318@newsfe09.iad>:


BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this
thread. Grow up.
Click to expand...
The convention is to place your response *underneath* the passage you're
replying to; much like the way your mother can often be found underneath
the UPS man.
 
Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess
readable. Why?



"JW" <none@dev.null> wrote in message
news:v5sdc61cl4e80s4h8ta4ci110bvpv45jjr@4ax.com...
The convention is to place your response *underneath* the passage you're
replying to; much like the way your mother can often be found underneath
the UPS man.


On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:53:50 -0400 "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com> wrote in
BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this
thread. Grow up.
 
Josepi:

Usenet has no rules and no conventions.
Click to expand...
It seems that also your mother doesn't.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.
Click to expand...
Exactly, idiot.
 
Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text,
moron?


"F. Bertolazzi" <TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it> wrote in message
news:cnevltvjw354$.94ehrm4in22v.dlg@40tude.net...
Exactly, idiot.
<personal oobseesion snipped>


Josepi:
Usenet has no rules and no conventions.
Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.
 
Josepi:

Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text,
moron?
Click to expand...
Because I want to read what the author responds to.
It is not compulsory to answer to each line of a post.
 
You antique morons just don't seem to get it.

Bottom posting was obsoleted by threading readers, years ago.
When you bottom post nobody knows where your text will start and have to
search for the beginning.
You know how your inconsideration goes. Scroll to the bottom and then start
scrolling backward to find the top of the fresh post.

Your name headers are not with your text and many mix-up and flame wars are
the direct result of the confusion. Special readers have been created to
attempt to relieve this confusion and it still isn't working.

I can read text posted in any format, using the free MOE reader and I do.
Are you new to this or dod you need a better reader?



"F. Bertolazzi" <TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it> wrote in message
news:1wd05vap3ao4j.f49xzyvrmtqo.dlg@40tude.net...
Because I want to read what the author responds to.
It is not compulsory to answer to each line of a post.



Josepi:
Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text,
moron?
 
On Oct 26, 1:51 pm, "F. Bertolazzi" <TOGLIe...@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it> wrote:
Josepi:

Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text,
moron?

Because I want to read what the author responds to.
It is not compulsory to answer to each line of a post.
Click to expand...
TELL THAT TO THE INSUFFERABLE DONKEY KELLY TROLL THAT DIGEST
EVERYTHING THEN REGURGITATES EACH POST LINE FOR LINE WITH HIS ANAL
COMMENTS SPLICED IN BETWEEN

SOME ONE SHOULD CAPTURE HIM A PLACE HIM IN A ZOO
FAR FAR AWAY FROM ANY KIND OF USENET ACCESS

I AM PROTEUS
 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:07:09 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com>
wrote:

Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess
readable. Why?
Click to expand...
Yes, Usenet does have conventions, and bottom posting is one. However
some simple folk just don't get it, never will.
 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:57:11 -0400, PeterD <peter2@hipson.net> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:07:09 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com
wrote:

Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess
readable. Why?
Click to expand...
---
The reason you don't consider bottom posting readable is because
you've fallen for Microsoft's email trap, where an answer should
precede a question, which it shouldn't.
---

Usenet does have conventions, and bottom posting is one. However
some simple folk just don't get it, never will.
Click to expand...
---
Indeed, and nicely stated. :)

---
JF
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top