24-30v dc power supply schematic

[Phil Allison]

"Cydrome Leader"

Phil Allison
"Rick"


For high current designs a full wave using a center tap transformer is
more efficient, it makes better use of the iron in the transformer ...

** That is 100% WRONG !!!!!!


http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c007.pdf


** The link is full of damn silly errors, shame on Hammond.

A full wave bridge plus filter cap is the most efficient by far.

that depends on the voltage you want from the power supply.

** Nonsense - a bridge rectifier always uses the transformer more
efficiently.

If you want a
low voltage high current supply, a bridge rectifier can be a poor choice.

** ROTFL !!

THREE completely undefined and unsupported claims, what rubbish !!!

And to a close approximation, peak DC and average DC are the SAME !!

that's if there's no ripple.

** Try reading the whole sentence - piss head.

What a posturing fuckwit.



..... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"Jamie" = radio ham moron: Maynard A. Philbrook



** Fuck off and die

- you stinking pile of AUTISTIC septic shit.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Jamie" = radio ham moron: Maynard A. Philbrook



** Fuck off and DIE

- you stinking pile of AUTISTIC septic shit.

 

[Jamie]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Cydrome Leader"

Phil Allison

"Rick"


For high current designs a full wave using a center tap transformer is
more efficient, it makes better use of the iron in the transformer ...

** That is 100% WRONG !!!!!!


http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c007.pdf


** The link is full of damn silly errors, shame on Hammond.

A full wave bridge plus filter cap is the most efficient by far.

that depends on the voltage you want from the power supply.



** Nonsense - a bridge rectifier always uses the transformer more
efficiently.

You're slipping again! It seems like it is becoming a habit lately.

I won't go into the obvious reasons why, you seem to be inadequate
lately to understand much, your responses show it.

If you want a
low voltage high current supply, a bridge rectifier can be a poor choice.



** ROTFL !!

THREE completely undefined and unsupported claims, what rubbish !!!

Perfect example of your dissolving brain cells.

** Try reading the whole sentence - piss head.

What a posturing fuckwit.



.... Phil

Get off the sauce, it's effecting your judgment.

And I thought the drugs here in the states were better, maybe I was
wrong about that one ? Actually, I was mistaken.

Jamie

 

[Jamie]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Jamie" = radio ham moron: Maynard A. Philbrook



** Fuck off and DIE

- you stinking pile of AUTISTIC septic shit.

Oh stop flattering me. I am not your usually friend

you like to hang out with, I have most of my teeth, you
would be lucky if you could find a one toother down there
in your neighborhood!

Jamie

 

[Jamie]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Jamie" = radio ham moron: Maynard A. Philbrook



** Fuck off and die

- you stinking pile of AUTISTIC septic shit.

You just can't handle it when you slip up.. That's too bad too,
I was hoping you'd stick your neck out even future, but you
have chosen the usual imodium.

Stick your nose in google some more, maybe you'll get it
correct the next time..

Jamie

 

[Phil Allison]

"Cydrome Leader"

Phil Allison


For high current designs a full wave using a center tap transformer is
more efficient, it makes better use of the iron in the transformer ...

** That is 100% WRONG !!!!!!


http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c007.pdf


** The link is full of damn silly errors, shame on Hammond.

A full wave bridge plus filter cap is the most efficient by far.

that depends on the voltage you want from the power supply.


** Nonsense - a bridge rectifier always uses the transformer more
efficiently.

I want to hear more about how you'd make a 2.2 volt 100 amp linear power
supply with a bridge rectifier, and what sort of single digit efficiency
you'd expect to get from it.

** Up to you to state what the special difficulties are, not me.

In any case - your fuckwit, trolling Q has SFA to do with efficient use of
the transformer windings.

Do try learning to READ sometime.

Jerk off.


.... Phil

 

[Cydrome Leader]

Phil Allison <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Cydrome Leader"
Phil Allison
"Rick"


For high current designs a full wave using a center tap transformer is
more efficient, it makes better use of the iron in the transformer ...

** That is 100% WRONG !!!!!!


http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c007.pdf


** The link is full of damn silly errors, shame on Hammond.

A full wave bridge plus filter cap is the most efficient by far.

that depends on the voltage you want from the power supply.


** Nonsense - a bridge rectifier always uses the transformer more
efficiently.

I want to hear more about how you'd make a 2.2 volt 100 amp linear power
supply with a bridge rectifier, and what sort of single digit efficiency
you'd expect to get from it.

 

[Cydrome Leader]

Phil Allison <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Cydrome Leader"
Phil Allison


For high current designs a full wave using a center tap transformer is
more efficient, it makes better use of the iron in the transformer ...

** That is 100% WRONG !!!!!!


http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c007.pdf


** The link is full of damn silly errors, shame on Hammond.

A full wave bridge plus filter cap is the most efficient by far.

that depends on the voltage you want from the power supply.


** Nonsense - a bridge rectifier always uses the transformer more
efficiently.

I want to hear more about how you'd make a 2.2 volt 100 amp linear power
supply with a bridge rectifier, and what sort of single digit efficiency
you'd expect to get from it.


** Up to you to state what the special difficulties are, not me.

In any case - your fuckwit, trolling Q has SFA to do with efficient use of
the transformer windings.

oh sorry, did I troll you?

are you upset?

are you slapping the shit out of your keyboard?