L
legg
Guest
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 11:51:12 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Got a boat?
RL
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Rich S wrote:
Amazing. Someone could set up a garage lab and do some serious stuff
really cheap these days.
** How about a VHF/ UHF SA for A$220 ?
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/174645368295?hash=item28a9acd5e7:g:vKgAAOSw7WJgUjkv
Thousands of uses......
..... Phil
Microwave frequency synthesizers can be had for literally 1/1000 of
what they cost 20 or 30 years ago.
If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon
what is everyone\'s opinion about \"USB scopes\" and \"USB SA\", etc.
where the computer does all human interface & control, and
a little black box handles the in\'s & out\'s.
I think I like it since the laptop has UXGA resolution or better, way
beyond what these stand-alone pieces have.
I\'d way rather have a stack of boat anchors for the same money. My lab
has nearly $2M worth of top-of-the-line test gear (at list prices) that
I\'ve paid probably $50k for over the years.
SDR-style spectrum analyzers are okay for spur chasing, but mostly
useless for the kind of RF stuff I do, which requires low phase noise.
USB things are great for portable use, of course, but AFAICT they tend
to be limited by their software.
The Ocean Optics spectrometers are the same way--the software is
infinitely flexible if you want to spend a week setting it up, but it\'s
a huge pain if you just want to turn it on and measure a spectrum.
Machines should do as they\'re damn well told.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Got a boat?
RL