M
Mark J.
Guest
Imagine, the likes of any weapon, entrusted to DarkMatter???
Isn't there a heap of irony in that?
Isn't there a heap of irony in that?
D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:08:43 -0500, "Mark J." <127.0.0.1> Gave us:
For you, I'll use the frozen PoopSlugs. With the amount of shit you
spew, you deserve to get some heaped back upon you.
with my sturdy PoopRailGun, designed specifically for twits like you.
For you, I'll use the frozen PoopSlugs. With the amount of shit you
spew, you deserve to get some heaped back upon you.
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
DarkMatter wrote:
The physics still doesn't permit it.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
Y'uh-huh... ho-hum...
Unrelated to "EMP".
You're delusional, this was supposedly up and coming 30 YEARS ago now!
The physics still doesn't permit it.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
DarkMatter wrote:
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
You lose...
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:01:40 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
Gave us:
Gave us:
Right.
Whatever you say, Tom.
And you're still lost.
D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:02:51 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
Gave us:
do you not understand?
You lose. You are worse than any horse with blinders on could ever
be, old man.
Gave us:
What part of "emitted electromagnetic spike IS what an EM Pulse is"
do you not understand?
You lose. You are worse than any horse with blinders on could ever
be, old man.
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
DarkMatter wrote:
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
You don't know, you know so damned little around here already.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
DarkMatter wrote:
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
EMP as any anti-electronics weapon with range is a lost cause.
You're the loser.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:50:20 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
Gave us:
That's mountains more than you.
Gave us:
I know what I and my country's leaders are working on.
That's mountains more than you.
D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:51:57 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
Gave us:
You really need a clue.
Gave us:
was pre-fused by one of these devices.
You really need a clue.
J
John S. Dyson
Guest
In article <s68l3056oco1r97l4hodhq42fckumcm9na@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> writes:
that the US (esp the US centrists and right) does (or is successful
in doing) results from deception. He even suspends any kind of logic
or thinking when considering US political or military issues -- and
his type of politics is usually wrong...
Even when Walz (and people like him) happen to be 'factually correct'
the actual process for creating his opinion is so very corrupt that
it is better (generally more probably correct) to use a random
event generator to select amongst the alternatives or even take
the opposite position from Walz. Slowman has essentially the
same kind of emotionally distorted (feeling based upon hate, not
factually based upon real world information) thinking.
John
DarkMatter <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> writes:
minded, hateful and statist arrogance) he believes that anything
that the US (esp the US centrists and right) does (or is successful
in doing) results from deception. He even suspends any kind of logic
or thinking when considering US political or military issues -- and
his type of politics is usually wrong...
Even when Walz (and people like him) happen to be 'factually correct'
the actual process for creating his opinion is so very corrupt that
it is better (generally more probably correct) to use a random
event generator to select amongst the alternatives or even take
the opposite position from Walz. Slowman has essentially the
same kind of emotionally distorted (feeling based upon hate, not
factually based upon real world information) thinking.
John
M
Mark J.
Guest
In news:jg9i3012s7nq7vsath7nq40d5q3lbb2vgk@4ax.com (DarkMatter):
You sound like yet another Texan. So sure of yourself, so goddammed
self-rightous you should be appointed God. Well fuck you, buddy. You ain't
shit. And you're never going to be shit. You're just a little dweeb with an
inferiority complex so severe, the NSA runs when it hears your name. You're
the pristine fuck who cuts in front of everyone in traffic and turns left on
red, the one who cuts in line at the grocery store, the one who yells at the
old lady because she's in your way, the one who drives by slowly in your
twenty-mile high SUV with gold-plated wheels and 5000-watt subwoofer system,
blasting out your psychosis-inducing drivel which you call music, while
flashing your firearm and gang symbols like they're supposed to *mean*
something. So take your 4-million calibre pistola and blow up the entire
world if you like, because it doesn't mean a thing to me, because you don't
mean a thing to me. Nothing you can do will summount to anything worthwhile.
Everything about you is self-depreciating. Your words don't even have
sustenance, you are nothing, you do not even exist, you are a shadow of a
human being. Go whereforth you came, pathetic excuse for a soul. May you
dwell on your past when death greets you.
You sound like yet another Texan. So sure of yourself, so goddammed
self-rightous you should be appointed God. Well fuck you, buddy. You ain't
shit. And you're never going to be shit. You're just a little dweeb with an
inferiority complex so severe, the NSA runs when it hears your name. You're
the pristine fuck who cuts in front of everyone in traffic and turns left on
red, the one who cuts in line at the grocery store, the one who yells at the
old lady because she's in your way, the one who drives by slowly in your
twenty-mile high SUV with gold-plated wheels and 5000-watt subwoofer system,
blasting out your psychosis-inducing drivel which you call music, while
flashing your firearm and gang symbols like they're supposed to *mean*
something. So take your 4-million calibre pistola and blow up the entire
world if you like, because it doesn't mean a thing to me, because you don't
mean a thing to me. Nothing you can do will summount to anything worthwhile.
Everything about you is self-depreciating. Your words don't even have
sustenance, you are nothing, you do not even exist, you are a shadow of a
human being. Go whereforth you came, pathetic excuse for a soul. May you
dwell on your past when death greets you.
M
Mark J.
Guest
In news:c1envn$312h$1@news.iquest.net (John S. Dyson):
Are you sure he's all smoke though?
Walz is definately passionate, that's not in question. He may be right, and
he may be wrong. But he sure seems to have a defined opinnion, and that's
more than I can say for myself.
Are you sure he's all smoke though?
Walz is definately passionate, that's not in question. He may be right, and
he may be wrong. But he sure seems to have a defined opinnion, and that's
more than I can say for myself.
J
John S. Dyson
Guest
In article <u5udnWeSvKgZX6bdRVn-uQ@buckeye-express.com>,
"Mark J." <127.0.0.1> writes:
but in the 'undecided' sense.) I don't see ANY problem with continued
indecision, as long as it doesn't excessively delay or impede someone's
life.
Even though I am sometimes passionate, I also *FEEL* that it is valid
for me to admit to a lack of commitment, admit to a poorly formed
opinion, or even sometimes not even being interested enough to
form an opinion.
So, I don't dismiss your intellect or interest simply because you might
not have a fully formed opinion on various subjects. Perhaps the most
unpleasant and/or least valuable contribution is when an individual
has many low quality (poorly formed) opinions, yet is willing to loudly
express those opinions. For example, I tend to avoid 'heated'
discussions on Usenet unless a claim has hit a 'nerve.' The
proverbial 'me too' response in a Usenet discussion is probably
just as silly as claiming the success of socialism as an
imposed system. (Please, I am not arguing exactly that issue, but
my position is that a system needs to be allowed to organically
evolve and maintain some kind of equilibrium without TOO MUCH meddling,
esp by 'intellectuals' or 'politicians'. Too often, individuals from
those groups have motives other than to be 'organic' participants
directly in the systems that they wish to control.)
It is better to admit to oneself (and the people in a discussion) when
an opinion might be poorly formed or perhaps that the participant is
simply not nterested in the subject. On subjects that
might not be interesting to the participant, it should be acceptable
and natural that the 'opinion' or position is 'null' or weak.
It might be a flaw, or even be slightly dishonest in a pure sense,
but I do try to consider the feelings or intellectual depth of
various individuals who are participants in a discussion.
I feel comfortable when expressing slightly different (but fully
compatible and consistent) opinions and arguments depending on the
audience. (Children vs. teenagers vs. adults vs. elderly vs.
socially conservative vs. socially libertine). I try to make sure
that my positions are consistent, but might be expressed differently
so that the position is understood to the extent of the ability of
the audience. On the other hand, I strongly dislike the kind of
'adapting to the audience' where INCOMPATIBLE or INCONSISTENT
opinions are expressed. Sometimes the imprecision of language
will cause minor inconsistencies, but our (US) politicians TOO
OFTEN make inconsistent assertions and express opinions that
are so very different depending upon audience that those speakers
can't be considered doing anything other than intentionally
telling lies. The better the communication skills, the stronger
the opinion, and the wider the gulf between statements, then
dishonesty, lack of dependability and capriciousness is strengthened.
(Here in the US, those attributes related to prevarication are
strongest in the left.)
Bottom line: it is probably more admirable to be humble
and accept not having a strongly held opinion rather than to
contrive an opinion. Sophism isn't helpful
.
John
"Mark J." <127.0.0.1> writes:
also valid to admit to a continued open mind (not in the 'political' sense,
but in the 'undecided' sense.) I don't see ANY problem with continued
indecision, as long as it doesn't excessively delay or impede someone's
life.
Even though I am sometimes passionate, I also *FEEL* that it is valid
for me to admit to a lack of commitment, admit to a poorly formed
opinion, or even sometimes not even being interested enough to
form an opinion.
So, I don't dismiss your intellect or interest simply because you might
not have a fully formed opinion on various subjects. Perhaps the most
unpleasant and/or least valuable contribution is when an individual
has many low quality (poorly formed) opinions, yet is willing to loudly
express those opinions. For example, I tend to avoid 'heated'
discussions on Usenet unless a claim has hit a 'nerve.' The
proverbial 'me too' response in a Usenet discussion is probably
just as silly as claiming the success of socialism as an
imposed system. (Please, I am not arguing exactly that issue, but
my position is that a system needs to be allowed to organically
evolve and maintain some kind of equilibrium without TOO MUCH meddling,
esp by 'intellectuals' or 'politicians'. Too often, individuals from
those groups have motives other than to be 'organic' participants
directly in the systems that they wish to control.)
It is better to admit to oneself (and the people in a discussion) when
an opinion might be poorly formed or perhaps that the participant is
simply not nterested in the subject. On subjects that
might not be interesting to the participant, it should be acceptable
and natural that the 'opinion' or position is 'null' or weak.
It might be a flaw, or even be slightly dishonest in a pure sense,
but I do try to consider the feelings or intellectual depth of
various individuals who are participants in a discussion.
I feel comfortable when expressing slightly different (but fully
compatible and consistent) opinions and arguments depending on the
audience. (Children vs. teenagers vs. adults vs. elderly vs.
socially conservative vs. socially libertine). I try to make sure
that my positions are consistent, but might be expressed differently
so that the position is understood to the extent of the ability of
the audience. On the other hand, I strongly dislike the kind of
'adapting to the audience' where INCOMPATIBLE or INCONSISTENT
opinions are expressed. Sometimes the imprecision of language
will cause minor inconsistencies, but our (US) politicians TOO
OFTEN make inconsistent assertions and express opinions that
are so very different depending upon audience that those speakers
can't be considered doing anything other than intentionally
telling lies. The better the communication skills, the stronger
the opinion, and the wider the gulf between statements, then
dishonesty, lack of dependability and capriciousness is strengthened.
(Here in the US, those attributes related to prevarication are
strongest in the left.)
Bottom line: it is probably more admirable to be humble
and accept not having a strongly held opinion rather than to
contrive an opinion. Sophism isn't helpful
.John
R
Rich Grise
Guest
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:4039516E.3A02@armory.com...
for the size of a transistor.
Heck, remember when to even _generate_ 2400 MHz you needed stuff
like magnetrons? Now they're freaking clocking processors with it.
No wonder those puppies get hot!
Cheers!
Rich
news:4039516E.3A02@armory.com...
Yeah, and bumblebees can't fly, and they've reached the quantum limit
for the size of a transistor.
Heck, remember when to even _generate_ 2400 MHz you needed stuff
like magnetrons? Now they're freaking clocking processors with it.
No wonder those puppies get hot!
Cheers!
Rich
D
Don Klipstein
Guest
In article <CbV_b.3466$Xv2.2584@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>, Rich Grise wrote:
since whenever whoever said bumblebees can't fly.
..05 micron between transistor centers on computer chips, with the
frequency limit approx. 10 GHz in computer chips with silicon.
1980's.
I thought the flaw in that reasoning was known for most of the time
since whenever whoever said bumblebees can't fly.
Only time I heard such a thing I heard the limit would be a little over
..05 micron between transistor centers on computer chips, with the
frequency limit approx. 10 GHz in computer chips with silicon.
I remember silicon transistors for something like 5 GHz in the early
1980's.
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:28:00 -0500, "Mark J." <127.0.0.1> Gave us:
now. You couldn't be more wrong. I ma the guy that wants to drop the
guy you just described with a wad of lead.
registrations. You don't know a fucking thing about me.
Band, Early Genesis.... etc. My tastes are probably far more refined
than yours. I makes money, money don't makes me...
me? Hahahahaha... you're a bigger idiot than I originally figured.
me, little boy.
anything original... or correct?
in your entire life. 2 medical, and 1 mil project, all vital.
Got clue?
so desire, you little cave lice.
that moment yourself.
You're an idiot. I am from the midwest, originally.
Wrong. I have ridden a bicycle to and from work for over ten years
now. You couldn't be more wrong. I ma the guy that wants to drop the
guy you just described with a wad of lead.
You're an anal lil' bat's turd.
I want to shoot those guys... or at least surcharge their vehicle
registrations. You don't know a fucking thing about me.
I listen to classical, old jazz... the Beatles, newer jazz.. The
Band, Early Genesis.... etc. My tastes are probably far more refined
than yours. I makes money, money don't makes me...
You're an idiot. You live in a sad little world.
You think your E-1 grade kaka assessments means a fucking thing to
me? Hahahahaha... you're a bigger idiot than I originally figured.
Nothing you can say will show that you know a fucking thing about
me, little boy.
Where did you cut and paste this baby bullshit from? Do you have
anything original... or correct?
I did more last week to make the world a better place than you will
in your entire life. 2 medical, and 1 mil project, all vital.
Got clue?
I'll even kick your lame ass at nethack, and nethack-speak should I
so desire, you little cave lice.
hope that the same conversation is on your lips when you arrive at
that moment yourself.
J
John Woodgate
Guest
I read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that DarkMatter <DarkMatter
@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote (in <g32s30hps4dk0r3rrhu8s0dja1p
g2v7282@4ax.com> about '10 threads that refuse to die', on Thu, 26 Feb
2004:
more?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote (in <g32s30hps4dk0r3rrhu8s0dja1p
g2v7282@4ax.com>
about '10 threads that refuse to die', on Thu, 26 Feb2004:
We ALL know how polite and tolerant you are. Do we need to know any
more?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
W
Watson A.Name \"Watt Sun
Guest
John Woodgate wrote:
have to see not only his posts, but also those replies with his post in
them. ;-)
Gee JW, if you'd only killfile him like everyone else, then we wouldn'tI read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that DarkMatter <DarkMatter
@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote (in <g32s30hps4dk0r3rrhu8s0dja1p
g2v7282@4ax.com>
2004:
You don't know a fucking thing about me.
We ALL know how polite and tolerant you are. Do we need to know any
more?
have to see not only his posts, but also those replies with his post in
them. ;-)
J
Jim Thompson
Guest
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:12:17 -0800, "Watson A.Name \"Watt Sun - the
Dark Remover\"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
it would be greatly appreciated. (Actually there are probably a lot
of people that wish you didn't reply to me
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Dark Remover\"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
Yes, JW, If you'd also stop replying to RSW and Slowman and BemelmanJohn Woodgate wrote:
I read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that DarkMatter <DarkMatter
@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote (in <g32s30hps4dk0r3rrhu8s0dja1p
g2v7282@4ax.com>
2004:
You don't know a fucking thing about me.
We ALL know how polite and tolerant you are. Do we need to know any
more?
Gee JW, if you'd only killfile him like everyone else, then we wouldn't
have to see not only his posts, but also those replies with his post in
them. ;-)
it would be greatly appreciated. (Actually there are probably a lot
of people that wish you didn't reply to me
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice
480)460-2350 | || E-mail Address at Website Fax
480)460-2142 | Brass Rat || http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.