Yo. FB

A

Active8

Guest
Bamelman said:

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> schreef in bericht
news:gLcis+ESWvPCFw+j@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Frank Bemelman
f.bemelmanq@xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote (in
423ef180$0$140$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>) about '9V 1A schematic
needed', on Mon, 21 Mar 2005:

So you and Jim Thompson are both confessed thieves. Jim in particular,
because $400 in 1968 is not what I would call pocket change.

Well, not thieves under English law, since, as it happens, 1968. In both
cases, the owner took no effective steps to re-possess. I'm quite sure
that if they had, the pay-back would have occurred.
Click to expand...
********************
Yes, that is my definition of an effective step too. Anyway, I found
it remarkable to read this 'aneckdote' from a person that insinuated
the other day that someone purchased a few opamps "at his EMPLOYERS
expense".

Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
*********************
Click to expand...

I recall that post also, but not from anyone in this subthread
(myself, you, JT, JW.)

To which person and anecdote are you referring?
--
Best Regards,
Mike
 
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:32:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:03:21 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote:


Bamelman said:

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> schreef in bericht
news:gLcis+ESWvPCFw+j@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Frank Bemelman
f.bemelmanq@xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote (in
423ef180$0$140$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>) about '9V 1A schematic
needed', on Mon, 21 Mar 2005:

So you and Jim Thompson are both confessed thieves. Jim in particular,
because $400 in 1968 is not what I would call pocket change.

Well, not thieves under English law, since, as it happens, 1968. In both
cases, the owner took no effective steps to re-possess. I'm quite sure
that if they had, the pay-back would have occurred.

********************
Yes, that is my definition of an effective step too. Anyway, I found
it remarkable to read this 'aneckdote' from a person that insinuated
the other day that someone purchased a few opamps "at his EMPLOYERS
expense".

Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
*********************

I recall that post also, but not from anyone in this subthread
(myself, you, JT, JW.)

To which person and anecdote are you referring?

It was me. I was referring to someone's (JL, I think) comment of
amazement that FB bought parts so he could prove someone wrong... I
implied FB probably bought the parts at his employer's expense.

...Jim Thompson
Click to expand...
Oooops! Someone might misinterpret FB as Frank Bemelman... since
Bemelman is non-existent you can figure who FB must be ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:33:58 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:32:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:03:21 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote:


Bamelman said:

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> schreef in bericht
news:gLcis+ESWvPCFw+j@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Frank Bemelman
f.bemelmanq@xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote (in
423ef180$0$140$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>) about '9V 1A schematic
needed', on Mon, 21 Mar 2005:

So you and Jim Thompson are both confessed thieves. Jim in particular,
because $400 in 1968 is not what I would call pocket change.

Well, not thieves under English law, since, as it happens, 1968. In both
cases, the owner took no effective steps to re-possess. I'm quite sure
that if they had, the pay-back would have occurred.

********************
Yes, that is my definition of an effective step too. Anyway, I found
it remarkable to read this 'aneckdote' from a person that insinuated
the other day that someone purchased a few opamps "at his EMPLOYERS
expense".

Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
*********************

I recall that post also, but not from anyone in this subthread
(myself, you, JT, JW.)

To which person and anecdote are you referring?

It was me. I was referring to someone's (JL, I think) comment of
amazement that FB bought parts so he could prove someone wrong... I
implied FB probably bought the parts at his employer's expense.
Click to expand...
Now I remember.
Oooops! Someone might misinterpret FB as Frank Bemelman... since
Bemelman is non-existent you can figure who FB must be ;-)
Click to expand...
Ok. A non-existent person I referred to as "FB" and "Bamelman"
should not be confused with an existing person who goes by a
psuedonym, the initials of which are also "FB".
--
Best Regards,
Mike
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:03:21 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote:


Bamelman said:


"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> schreef in bericht
news:gLcis+ESWvPCFw+j@jmwa.demon.co.uk...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Frank Bemelman
f.bemelmanq@xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote (in
423ef180$0$140$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>) about '9V 1A schematic
needed', on Mon, 21 Mar 2005:


So you and Jim Thompson are both confessed thieves. Jim in particular,
because $400 in 1968 is not what I would call pocket change.

Well, not thieves under English law, since, as it happens, 1968. In both
cases, the owner took no effective steps to re-possess. I'm quite sure
that if they had, the pay-back would have occurred.

********************

Yes, that is my definition of an effective step too. Anyway, I found
it remarkable to read this 'aneckdote' from a person that insinuated
the other day that someone purchased a few opamps "at his EMPLOYERS
expense".

Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and 'invalid' when replying by email)

*********************

I recall that post also, but not from anyone in this subthread
(myself, you, JT, JW.)

To which person and anecdote are you referring?


It was me. I was referring to someone's (JL, I think) comment of
amazement that FB bought parts so he could prove someone wrong... I
implied FB probably bought the parts at his employer's expense.

...Jim Thompson
Click to expand...
I said and did no such thing- could care less about "proving" anything
about the worthless noise source and moron, Clarence- and have never
"stolen" anything from any employer. Your comments are a malicious
defamation- and anyone who listens to you is USENET dog manure.
 
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:18:37 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

the worthless noise source and moron, Clarence
Click to expand...
I couldn't agree more.
 
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:20:55 GMT, xray <notreally@hotmail.invalid>
wrote:

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:18:37 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

the worthless noise source and moron, Clarence

I couldn't agree more.
Click to expand...
I've long since moved him into the "don't download, don't read, ignore
it completely, I don't want to even know it happened" category. And I
luckily haven't seen hide nor hair of his name for some time.

Is he still posting in newsgroups??

On second thought, don't tell me. I don't want to know.

Jon
 
"Jonathan Kirwan" A_Cur@dogsareus.common wrote
xray <the_real+Idiiot@hotmail.in_valid> wrote:
Fred Bloggs <The_Obseen@spam.com> wrote:

the worthless noise source and moron, Clarence
I couldn't agree more.
I've long since moved him into the
"don't download, don't read, ignore
it completely, I don't want to even
know it happened" category. And I
luckily haven't seen hide nor hair
of his name for some time.

Is he still posting in newsgroups??
Click to expand...
Safe from the Idiot crew I see!
Nice here.
I'm sure glad to here that those of a feather have
roosted together and are keeping to themselves!

HAPPY DAY!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top