L
lecroy
Guest
Looking at the mode selection M2 on the SII devices in Xilinx document
DS-001_2, table 8, I wonder if the M2 for master mode is correct? It
seems to match the rest of the data sheet, but I would have thought
the the pullups would always follow the M2 pin and this is the only
mode where it does not.
On the SII, there is no mention of allowing for a weak pullup on the
global clock lines. Interesting enough that using the 6.x tools and
placing the following in the constraints:
NET "p_pclock" LOC = "P88" | IOSTANDARD = LVTTL | PULLUP ;
I get the following message from project manager during place and
route:
Annotating constraints to design from file "main.ucf" ...
Attached a PULLUP primitive to pad net p_pclock
If I look at the FPGA editor at pin 88 after place and route, there is
no dialog box to allow for pullups, etc, like there are with a
standard I/O. So, I would have to guess that in the actual device
there was no pullup added. Can someone at Xilinx confirm this?
Thanks
DS-001_2, table 8, I wonder if the M2 for master mode is correct? It
seems to match the rest of the data sheet, but I would have thought
the the pullups would always follow the M2 pin and this is the only
mode where it does not.
On the SII, there is no mention of allowing for a weak pullup on the
global clock lines. Interesting enough that using the 6.x tools and
placing the following in the constraints:
NET "p_pclock" LOC = "P88" | IOSTANDARD = LVTTL | PULLUP ;
I get the following message from project manager during place and
route:
Annotating constraints to design from file "main.ucf" ...
Attached a PULLUP primitive to pad net p_pclock
If I look at the FPGA editor at pin 88 after place and route, there is
no dialog box to allow for pullups, etc, like there are with a
standard I/O. So, I would have to guess that in the actual device
there was no pullup added. Can someone at Xilinx confirm this?
Thanks