D
Daniel
Guest
Hi,
I'm working with ISE 9.1i and it seems to be removing some LOCed
pins.
I have a top level with a grop of input pins (xBBIO_N0...xBBIO_N31)
and output pins (xPMC_N0...xPMC_N31). All I do in my design is to add
a component who does an assignation (31 times in a "for generate"):
IBUF(i=>xBBIO_N0,o=>xPMC_N0)
When PAR finishes and I open the CSV file, I see that all those
signals are are gone!.
In the Map report I see a suspicious warning;
WARNING:MapLib:701 - Signal xBBIO_N0 conected to top level port
xBBIO_N0 has been removed
The Xilinx´s knowledge database refers to ISE 8.1 but I'm using ISE
9.1!!.
There is a thread (http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/
comp.arch.fpga/2005-09/msg00169.html) about this problem but none of
those solutions worked. Because I cant set "AD I/O buffers" option
(other errors appear in that case).
Am I forgetting a constraint or something?.
Regards,
Daniel.
I'm working with ISE 9.1i and it seems to be removing some LOCed
pins.
I have a top level with a grop of input pins (xBBIO_N0...xBBIO_N31)
and output pins (xPMC_N0...xPMC_N31). All I do in my design is to add
a component who does an assignation (31 times in a "for generate"):
IBUF(i=>xBBIO_N0,o=>xPMC_N0)
When PAR finishes and I open the CSV file, I see that all those
signals are are gone!.
In the Map report I see a suspicious warning;
WARNING:MapLib:701 - Signal xBBIO_N0 conected to top level port
xBBIO_N0 has been removed
The Xilinx´s knowledge database refers to ISE 8.1 but I'm using ISE
9.1!!.
There is a thread (http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/
comp.arch.fpga/2005-09/msg00169.html) about this problem but none of
those solutions worked. Because I cant set "AD I/O buffers" option
(other errors appear in that case).
Am I forgetting a constraint or something?.
Regards,
Daniel.