C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:35:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Bullshit. Renewable energy is a good idea because - there\'s no fuel cost, and the fuel can\'t run out. It\'s not a good idea because of CO2. We should use whatever turns out cheapest. That will eventually be renewable as gas runs out.
On 30/03/2023 18:36, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:05:50 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:54:34 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:19:59 -0000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
On 21-Mar-23 7:42 am, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 18:34:51 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 18/03/2023 11:39, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:39:03 -0000, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
An electrician (who I don\'t believe) told me if there\'s too much power on the grid, they use wind turbines as fans to absorb extra power. Is this really true? Aren\'t there plenty of power stations they can just turn down a bit? Take your foot off the gas so to speak?
If there is a risk of overproduction due to wind turbines, simply stop
some wind turbines. Wind turbines must have brakes so that they can be
stopped during a strong storm (about 25 m/s) to avoid damaging the
turbine. Of course greenies will complain about stopping renewable
production, but who cares.
We do, because they still get paid to stop generating as if they had
been generating.
In practice, district heating companies are installing electrically
heated boilers to heat district heating water when there is an
overproduction of wind energy and hence the selectivity price drops
towards zero, thus saving on coal/oil/gas/biofuel during
overproduction.
No they are not.
Our local district heating company just installed an electrically
heated boiler to heat water, when the electric prices drops towards
zero due to wind overproduction. The claim is that by doing so, 16,000
tons of emissions are reduced.
In areas with mainly cooling loads, wind and solar overproduction can
be used to cool water in advance for air conditioning.
But no one does
They are simply stupid, if they don\'t.
It is in the wind farm company best interest to avoid electric prices
falling to zero or negative. The wind farm company should try to
\'invent\' ways that their customers could use this overproduction in
some way and get at least a cent or two instead of zero.
.
They should be required to provide the storage systems needed to
compensate for their intermittency. At the moment, they get a free ride
by being able to sell power when they can produce it, and not when they
can\'t.
A wind turbine has a really tall post in the middle, could a weight or fluid not be pumped up there?
Show us the math.
https://onezero.medium.com/the-new-super-battery-made-of-concrete-aeee436ecc67
Seems improbable to me.
That\'s virtually guaranteed with \'green\' energy none of which is
radical or new, all of which has been tried at least on paper and none
of which has been found to be viable.
Bullshit. Renewable energy is a good idea because - there\'s no fuel cost, and the fuel can\'t run out. It\'s not a good idea because of CO2. We should use whatever turns out cheapest. That will eventually be renewable as gas runs out.