What would be the drawbacks of this TV/computer display?

[GreenXenon]

Hi

I’m thinking of a hypothetical monitor for a TV/computer. This display
does not use plasma, LCD, or a backlight to any extent. Instead it
relies purely on ILEDs for emission of light, colors, and images. As
with most screens, each pixel contains a red, green, and blue
subpixel. However, in this hypothetical monitor, each subpixel
consists of a single ILED.

ILED = Inorganic Light Emitting Diode

Each pixel – and its respective subpixels – are as small as physically-
possible given the state of today’s technology. The screen contains as
many pixels per area physically-possible with today’s technology.
These specs ensure that highest possible image resolution.

What would be the disadvantages of this purely-ILED monitor – besides
the cost?

I think this type of display is the most eco-friendly possible
considering today’s technology. Am I right?

ILED kicks LCD’s butt anyday.

These so-called “LED TVs” in the current market as simply LCDs with
LED backlights. These evil marketers are so manipulative and the
customers who fall for them are so unwise.

LCDs reek. When an LCD monitor is turned on, it required more watts to
stay dark than to be bright. My hypothetical ILED monitor does the
exact opposite and is more eco-friendly because it doesn’t waste
energy using a backlight.

My ILED screen totally kills both plasma and LCD technology. ILED also
is significantly more energy-efficient than OLED.


Thanks,

Green Xenon

 

[F. Bertolazzi]

GreenXenon:

Hi

IĄŚm thinking of a hypothetical monitor for a TV/computer. This display
does not use plasma, LCD, or a backlight to any extent. Instead it
relies purely on ILEDs for emission of light, colors, and images.

This "emission of images" already puts you in a gray zone.

As with most screens, each pixel contains a red, green, and blue
subpixel. However, in this hypothetical monitor, each subpixel consists
of a single ILED.

Like in the big screens used in rock concerts, TV studios or on the sides
of soccer fields?

ILED = Inorganic Light Emitting Diode

LED are inorganic, unless otherwise noted.

Each pixel ĄV and its respective subpixels ĄV are as small as physically-
possible given the state of todayĄŚs technology. The screen contains as
many pixels per area physically-possible with todayĄŚs technology. These
specs ensure that highest possible image resolution.

Given the state of today's technology.

What would be the disadvantages of this purely-ILED monitor ĄV besides
the cost?

None. The big problem are the connections.
That's why there are no such screens big as a tv.

I think this type of display is the most eco-friendly possible
considering todayĄŚs technology. Am I right?

Yes.

ILED kicks LCDĄŚs butt anyday.

Another step in your descent.

These so-called Ą§LED TVsĄ¨ in the current market as simply LCDs with LED
backlights. These evil marketers are so manipulative and the customers
who fall for them are so unwise.

Well, at least they produce something that can be produced, instead of
fantasizing on trivial inventions.

My ILED screen totally kills both plasma and LCD technology. ILED also
is significantly more energy-efficient than OLED.

As usual, if you can build it, you're a genius, otherwise a crackpot.