What makes John Larkin an Asshole ?

P

Phil Allison

Guest
Hi to all resident shitheads,

** No one has disagreed with any of this so far.

It must be undeniably true then.


Repost from another thread:
---------------------------


FYI to all :

John Larkin has many times boasted that he considers usenet posting to be a joke - nothing is serious or real here, as far as he is concerned.

Recently, he also boasted that he is so socially inept he hides himself away when friends of his wife or children visit his home - cos he hasn't got any.

A little earlier, he boasted that he has no interest whatever in any kind of music or film - both bore him to tears. Explains why he hates audio electronics so much and that he has zero comprehension of it.

He also has openly admitted to being autistic, but figures it a plus not a minus for him.

IOW Larkin is a super geek, far more obnoxious than even the famous TV character "Sheldon" in Big Bang Theory. Sheldon is inept and unsympathetic, but not outright malicious.

The one individual I would most like removed from this NG is Larkin.

He trolls like crazy, big notes himself, posts bullshit ideas as if they are facts, starts ridiculous disputes, piles on to disputes he has no place being in, massively over-snips other's posts so he can misrepresent them and makes being here far worse for everyone.

He sets an example that has ruined any possible value this NG could have for anyone with an *actual* design question.

Larkin has been doing all this so often, over a period of decades, he must be getting some very sick pleasure out of it.

IMO - even if he is not actually a psychopath, he IS doing a damn good impersonation of one.

I very much doubt JL is ever going to change his ways - so he needs to go away.

Lets see what happens next.


----------------------------------------------------------
 
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:43:50 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

>

More important, why is nobody interested in my 2nd order delta-sigma
modulator simulation? I couldn't find one online, so I had to do it
myself.

It runs slow, of course, but it is fun to play with. It may qualify as
an official chaotic system, because some parts, especially the noise
spectrum, are exquisitely sensitive to everything.
 
On Saturday, 14 September 2019 17:57:44 UTC+1, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

More important, why is nobody interested in my 2nd order delta-sigma
modulator simulation? I couldn't find one online, so I had to do it
myself.

It runs slow, of course, but it is fun to play with. It may qualify as
an official chaotic system, because some parts, especially the noise
spectrum, are exquisitely sensitive to everything.
Click to expand...

didn't know you'd posted one


NT
 
On 2019/09/14 4:10 p.m., tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 14 September 2019 17:57:44 UTC+1, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

More important, why is nobody interested in my 2nd order delta-sigma
modulator simulation? I couldn't find one online, so I had to do it
myself.

It runs slow, of course, but it is fun to play with. It may qualify as
an official chaotic system, because some parts, especially the noise
spectrum, are exquisitely sensitive to everything.

didn't know you'd posted one


NT
Click to expand...

You missed his posting at 10PM on the Sept. 12th then...

Subject: delta-sigma modulator in LT Spice

John ;-#)#
 
On Sunday, 15 September 2019 00:45:19 UTC+1, John Robertson wrote:
On 2019/09/14 4:10 p.m., tabbypurr wrote:
On Saturday, 14 September 2019 17:57:44 UTC+1, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

More important, why is nobody interested in my 2nd order delta-sigma
modulator simulation? I couldn't find one online, so I had to do it
myself.

It runs slow, of course, but it is fun to play with. It may qualify as
an official chaotic system, because some parts, especially the noise
spectrum, are exquisitely sensitive to everything.

didn't know you'd posted one


NT


You missed his posting at 10PM on the Sept. 12th then...

Subject: delta-sigma modulator in LT Spice

John ;-#)#
Click to expand...

seen it now.
 
On Saturday, September 14, 2019 at 12:43:55 PM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Hi to all resident shitheads,

** No one has disagreed with any of this so far.

It must be undeniably true then.


Repost from another thread:
---------------------------
:


Your logic is faulty.
Click to expand...

It does not follow that -something is true just because no one disagrees with it. For years no one disagreed with those that said the earth is flat.

It is much more likely that those that read your post did not think it was worth replying to your post.

Dan
 
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:41:11 -0700, dcaster@krl.org wrote:

Your logic is faulty.

It does not follow that -something is true just because no one disagrees
with it. For years no one disagreed with those that said the earth is
flat.

It is much more likely that those that read your post did not think it
was worth replying to your post.
Click to expand...

Or didn't even see it in the first place 'cos the original poster was
plonked! :-D



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:43:50 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:



More important, why is nobody interested in my 2nd order delta-sigma
modulator simulation? I couldn't find one online, so I had to do it
myself.

It runs slow, of course, but it is fun to play with. It may qualify as
an official chaotic system, because some parts, especially the noise
spectrum, are exquisitely sensitive to everything.
Click to expand...

Phil's meds seem to have been adjusted incorrectly.

Coincidentally last night I watched an episode of Uncommon Knowledge on
youtube called "Mathematical challenges to Darwin" which is about the
same topic as that long biology debate here a few months ago. The 3
scientists in the forum back you up strongly, and I didn't agree with
you at the time.
 
dca...@krl.org wrote:

------------------------

Phil Allison wrote:

Hi to all resident shitheads,

** No one has disagreed with any of this so far.

It must be undeniably true then.


Repost from another thread:
---------------------------
:


Your logic is faulty.
Click to expand...

** No its not.

> It does not follow that -something is true just because no one disagrees with it.

** You logic is totally false.

It ignores the actual circumstances here and make false analogy from the particular to the general.

You fake example was idiotic.

Just like you.


..... Phil
 
Cursitor Doom wrote:

-----------------------


It is much more likely that those that read your post did not think it
was worth replying to your post.

Or didn't even see it in the first place 'cos the original poster was
plonked! :-D
Click to expand...

** I have no idea how many haters have "plonked" me - I know some have advised doing that, so the number must include them.

What really pisses me off though is when I see a hate post from one, piling on to another hate post quoting part of I what I said - over snipped & out of all context.

Haters on social media (like Facebook etc) do this constantly forcing some very worthwhile posters to quit before it escalates into violent threats and criminal harassment.

It sadly reveals just how many fucking assholes there are out there.



..... Phil





--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Click to expand...
 
On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 3:27:23 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:41:11 -0700, dcaster@krl.org wrote:

Your logic is faulty.

It does not follow that -something is true just because no one disagrees
with it. For years no one disagreed with those that said the earth is
flat.

It is much more likely that those that read your post did not think it
was worth replying to your post.

Or didn't even see it in the first place 'cos the original poster was
plonked! :-D
Click to expand...

People silly enough to go in for plonking don't have opinions worth worrying about.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 2:41:15 AM UTC+10, dca...@krl.org wrote:
On Saturday, September 14, 2019 at 12:43:55 PM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Hi to all resident shitheads,

** No one has disagreed with any of this so far.

It must be undeniably true then.


Repost from another thread:
---------------------------
:


Your logic is faulty.

It does not follow that something is true just because no one disagrees with it. For years no one disagreed with those that said the earth is flat.
Click to expand...

There wasn't a lot of evidence either way back then.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes

got it right a couple of thousand years back.

> It is much more likely that those that read your post did not think it was worth replying to your post.

That's Dan's somewhat fallible opinion. It could equally be said that those that read the post didn't feel the need to endorse it.

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top