Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
LMFAO !"David Snowdon"
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
** Kindly post a pic of them on ABSE or a web link.
4000 series.David Snowdon wrote:
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series
Phil Allison wrote:
"David Snowdon"
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
** Kindly post a pic of them on ABSE or a web link.
LMFAO !
David Snowdon wrote:
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series CMOS that came out -
oh - 40 years ago ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4000_series
David Snowdon wrote:
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series
4000 series.
Before that there was 54/74 series TTL and before that 930 series DTL
logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_family
Never met any RTL, except discrete simple implementations.
Graham
It's still very funny."EeySore"
Phil Allison wrote:
"David Snowdon"
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
** Kindly post a pic of them on ABSE or a web link.
LMFAO !
** The congenital ASD fucked tenth-wit has missed the point entirely
- by a thousand miles.
My Q was a challenge, not a request.
WTF are you rambling on about ? Is it the phase of the moon or something ?"EeySore"
David Snowdon wrote:
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series
4000 series.
Before that there was 54/74 series TTL and before that 930 series DTL
logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_family
Never met any RTL, except discrete simple implementations.
** ROTFLMAO
God, how the evil, psychotic, autistic puke must besooooo pissed.
It's not in my ancient Philips printed 4000 series databook but it'sEyeSore the CONGENITAL MORON
David Snowdon wrote:
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series CMOS that came out -
oh - 40 years ago ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4000_series
** Funny how it is not listed.
Why not experiment with one of them by connecting 4K7 pullup resistorsThe subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
Any info would be appreciated.
Thanks,
David, VA3DKS
This assumes that it is, in fact, a digital deviceWhy not experiment with one of them by connecting 4K7 pullup resistors
to each of the input and output pins? Then do the same with pulldown
resistors. In this way you'll construct a partial truth table.
I'm almost willing to bet it's something simple, like reversed digits.Franc Zabkar wrote:
Why not experiment with one of them by connecting 4K7 pullup resistors
to each of the input and output pins? Then do the same with pulldown
resistors. In this way you'll construct a partial truth table.
This assumes that it is, in fact, a digital device
and that it doesn't use registers.
I'm still waiting to see a photo of it.
I'm still waiting to see a photo of it.
Maybe smarter than you? That was the easy bit. Now look for that actualHow dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series CMOS that came out -
oh - 40 years ago ?
Has it really NEVER occured to you that those guys are full enough of shitPhil Allison the kangaroo shagger wrote:
EyeSore the CONGENITAL MORON
David Snowdon wrote:
The subject line says it all. I have four of these RCA
ICs in my parts box, but have been unable to ID them.
How dumb are you ?
Has the name Google eluded you all these years ? I take it, that's a
radio ham ID, yet you've never heard of 400 series CMOS that came out
- oh - 40 years ago ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4000_series
** Funny how it is not listed.
It's not in my ancient Philips printed 4000 series databook but it's
interesting that these guys claim to have some for sale.
http://www.ic-trade.com/eparts/CD4074.html
http://www.hkinventory.com/public/OfferInventResult.asp?Order=1&pnums=cd4
074&crit1=&crit2=&category=&product=&keywords=&words=3&country=&postdate=
&brand=&crit3=&crit4=0&datecode=
Was it a typo though and he meant CD4047 ?
Graham
EyeSore the CONGENITAL MORON
Has it really NEVER occured to you that those guys are full enough of shit
that they'd fill in gaps in apparent sequences just to make it look like
they
have everything? No wonder counterfeiters and shysters can profit so
easily
when that kind of gullibility persists.
One indication of that is that the sequence numbers are filled in, but"Lostgallifreyan"
EyeSore the CONGENITAL MORON
Has it really NEVER occured to you that those guys are full enough of shit
that they'd fill in gaps in apparent sequences just to make it look like
they
have everything? No wonder counterfeiters and shysters can profit so
easily
when that kind of gullibility persists.
** For once, the homeless fruit cake is right.
Counterfeiters would not hesitate to sell semis to order with part numbers
printed on them that simply DO NOT EXIST.
What possible complaint about quality or performance could be maintained
after that ??
LOL !!!!
.... Phil
"Lostgallifreyan"
EyeSore the CONGENITAL MORON
Has it really NEVER occured to you that those guys are full enough of
shit
that they'd fill in gaps in apparent sequences just to make it look like
they
have everything? No wonder counterfeiters and shysters can profit so
easily
when that kind of gullibility persists.
** For once, the homeless fruit cake is right.
Counterfeiters would not hesitate to sell semis to order with part numbers
printed on them that simply DO NOT EXIST.
What possible complaint about quality or performance could be maintained
after that ??
LOL !!!!
One indication of that is that the sequence numbers are filled in, but
not the package suffixes. Probably it's not so evil as
counterfeiting-- simply that if they get a request for something
they'll go to the trouble of looking for it.