Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Subject: Vote For Nixon!
From: Paul Burridge pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk
Date: 10/24/2004 9:00 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id: <k9dnn09rd3s25j5eg8l3jfvlgoed0ohbsj@4ax.com
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
--
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
Interestingly, the Chinese seemed to have a lot of time for him.Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
--
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
saw this recently; don't recall the source.Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
Well, I'm gonna stop speechifying, and just point to this guy. ;-)Subject: Vote For Nixon!
From: Paul Burridge pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
You're in good company, Paul.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/6562575?pageid=rs.Home&pageregion=single7
Fear and Loathing, Campaign 2004
Dr. Hunter S. Thompson sounds off on the fun-hogs in the passing lane
By DR. HUNTER S. THOMPSON
Its a goat used to lead sheep to slaughter.On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:56:13 +0000, CFoley1064 wrote:
Subject: Vote For Nixon!
From: Paul Burridge pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
You're in good company, Paul.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/6562575?pageid=rs.Home&pageregion=single7
Fear and Loathing, Campaign 2004
Dr. Hunter S. Thompson sounds off on the fun-hogs in the passing lane
By DR. HUNTER S. THOMPSON
Well, I'm gonna stop speechifying, and just point to this guy. ;-)
But, what the hell is a "Judas Goat"? I've tried looking it up, and
all I get is links to some book that's for sale, and naval academy
politics and witchcraft among the Masons, all of which seem to have
come up in the search engine, but nothing that says "A Judas Goat
is a ..."
Thanks!
Rich
"Paul Burridge" <pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote in message
news:k9dnn09rd3s25j5eg8l3jfvlgoed0ohbsj@4ax.com...
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
--
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
Interestingly, the Chinese seemed to have a lot of time for him.
But ... I was really concerned for the fate of the planet when Reagan got
in.
I had assumed this ex-actor was thick enough to knee-jerk and press the
button if trouble turned up somewhere.
My opinion totally reversed after coming across that appalling joke he
cracked, about outlawing Russia and sending the nukes in. He clearly had
things in perspective. I'd no worries about him from then on.
A decent guy and missed!.
regards
john
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:00:24 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
saw this recently; don't recall the source.
George W. Bush makes
Nixon look honest
Reagan look smart
and his Dad look coherent.
';-)
I just rolled some dice, threw a dart and spun around 3 times in my chair.The NY Times had an article on Sunday, estimating the IQs of W and
Kerry based on available test data. They put Kerry at about 120, and W
in the mid-120s.
IQ doesn't do any good if you aren't willing to listen to anybody exceptOn Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:26:55 GMT, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:00:24 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
saw this recently; don't recall the source.
George W. Bush makes
Nixon look honest
Reagan look smart
and his Dad look coherent.
';-)
The NY Times had an article on Sunday, estimating the IQs of W and
Kerry based on available test data. They put Kerry at about 120, and W
in the mid-120s.
foolishness. ;-)In article <oq9rn012fvhb20mmv6fi0c27a450gko37c@4ax.com>,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:
[...]
The NY Times had an article on Sunday, estimating the IQs of W and
Kerry based on available test data. They put Kerry at about 120, and W
in the mid-120s.
I just rolled some dice, threw a dart and spun around 3 times in my chair.
Based on this data, I say Kerry's is about 103.2 and W's about 101.7 I
suspect that my numbers are as good as the NY times. Both people have
been trained to be light on their feet in debate like situations.
Well, I for one stand as living proof that a high IQ is no proof against
Please explain how Nixon " Ended the VietNam war" ?On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:00:24 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
Established the EPA. Ended the VietNam war. Open relationships with
China. Bad guy.
John
One can only assume the war was reported differently in the US than itPlease explain how Nixon " Ended the VietNam war" ?
By pulling all our troops out.On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:24:20 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:00:24 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
Established the EPA. Ended the VietNam war. Open relationships with
China. Bad guy.
John
Please explain how Nixon " Ended the VietNam war" ?
Over a seven year period? What was the rush? And don't forget about theOn Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:54:45 GMT, john_c@tpg.com.au (John Crighton)
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:24:20 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:00:24 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:
Sure he was a crook, but quite likeable. I think it was that shifty
expression of his. Plus of course you knew where you stood with him.
Established the EPA. Ended the VietNam war. Open relationships with
China. Bad guy.
John
Please explain how Nixon " Ended the VietNam war" ?
By pulling all our troops out.
Hehe- they were trying to prevent Eisenhower's "domino effect"- a longIt was Kennedy who started that particular war, and Johnson who lied
to Congress to massively escalate it.
I suppose you could view it that way! Just coincidentally, though, theOn Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:54:45 GMT, john_c@tpg.com.au (John Crighton)
wrote:
Please explain how Nixon " Ended the VietNam war" ?
By pulling all our troops out.
Was he the guy in office when we lost? I was in Thailand at the time,On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:54:45 GMT, john_c@tpg.com.au (John Crighton)
wrote:
Please explain how Nixon " Ended the VietNam war" ?
One can only assume the war was reported differently in the US than it
was in the rest of the world. ;-)
"Lost"?? You can't use that word in this context in this newsgroup,Was he the guy in office when we lost?
Well, it didn't work. He got Vietnam pregnant, and the Iraq invasionOn Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:33:44 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
Was he the guy in office when we lost?
"Lost"?? You can't use that word in this context in this newsgroup,
Rich. Remember the good folks here like Jim Thompson and his blood
pressure problem! It was simply a 'tactical pull-out' ;-)