A
alb
Guest
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to use vmkr to generate Makefiles to handle dependencies.
I downloaded version 2.8 from here:
At the moment of execution I run the program as suggested in the user
manual (vmkr.doc.ps):
vmkr -ts *.vhd > Makefile
and got this as the output:
way, I have one unit only per file so there shouldn't be a problem on
that end.
Any insight would be helpful.
Thanks a lot,
Al
p.s.: it seems like this software dates back in the 1993, which may
explain the list of warnings. If anyone knows a more recent one that
could be helpful.
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
I'm trying to use vmkr to generate Makefiles to handle dependencies.
I downloaded version 2.8 from here:
built it with gcc (instead of cc), got a bunch of warnings like these:http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/index.php?content=07-tools
but managed to compile.warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen'
At the moment of execution I run the program as suggested in the user
manual (vmkr.doc.ps):
vmkr -ts *.vhd > Makefile
and got this as the output:
As if it was not even capable to find the top level architecture. By thevmkr -ts *.vhd > Makefile
BNR vmkr version 2.8 (Nov 08/93 11:10)
Copyright (C) 1993 Bell-Northern Research.
Please email bugs/suggestions to hemi@bnr.ca
The possible top level architectures are :
The possible top level configurations are :
Segmentation fault
way, I have one unit only per file so there shouldn't be a problem on
that end.
Any insight would be helpful.
Thanks a lot,
Al
p.s.: it seems like this software dates back in the 1993, which may
explain the list of warnings. If anyone knows a more recent one that
could be helpful.
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?