UV lamp question for ozone generation...

[KILOWATT]

Hi everyones...thanks to read. Please check the following link:
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3872692720&fromMakeTrack=t
rue
With a proper enclosure, circulating fan, a timer circuit, and the item
descibed there, do you think that i would have all the components to make an
inexpensive but efficient Ozone generator? TIA

--
Alain(alias:Kilowatt)
Montréal Québec
PS: 1000 excuses for errors or omissions,
i'm a "pure" french canadian!
Come to visit me at: http://kilowatt.camarades.com
(If replying also by e-mail, remove
"no spam" from the adress.)

 

[Bob Masta]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:03:57 -0500, Mark Jones <abuse@127.0.0.1>
wrote:

The stuff is only good
for two things: blocking harmful UV in the upper atmosphere (where it belongs
and all the skin cancer patients wish there were more of) and cleaning large
volumes of open air (what we get from thunderstorms naturally.)

Another use for ozone: Water purification, instead of chlorine.
Don't know the pros and cons of this, but a local spring water
company used it to purify their water. I think they claimed it
left no or less harmful products in the water than chlorine.

Best regards,


Bob Masta
dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com

 

[Fred Abse]

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:16:14 +0000, John Woodgate wrote:

Less harmful products, and the water tastes better. But ozone treatment is
more costly than chlorine. You also get, of course, the idiots who cite
the limits for *airborne* ozone to show that it's 'far more toxic' than
chlorine.

Are there any limits for airborne chlorine? I know which of chlorine or
ozone I'd rather breathe traces of

Ozone decomposes, too.



--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)

 

[Mark Jones]

Hmm, I wonder how O3 would do as a regenerator for CuCl etchant...

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Bob Masta <NoSpam@daqarta.com>
wrote (in <4210a3ed.1507973@news.itd.umich.edu&gt about 'UV lamp question
for ozone generation...', on Mon, 14 Feb 2005:

I've never heard of CuCl as an etchant,

It's actually cupric chloride, CuCl2. It isn't nearly as well known as
ferric chloride FeCl3, but it is quite widely used in industry.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Fred Abse]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:27:29 +0000, John Woodgate wrote:

Yes, prone to 'autonomous energetic disassembly'. (;-)

I once made some copper acetylide at school.

Nitrogen triiodide was good, too...

Amazing what you could get away with back then.

--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)