US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

D

Don McKenzie

Guest
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband
speeds of 100 Mbps over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of fibre at one-tenth the cost of
fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley, CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and created "compensation signals" that cancelled out
noise, Ikanos explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris,
France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom" noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could
deliver speeds 850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copper.aspx

Cheers Don...


======================


--
Don McKenzie

Site Map: http://www.dontronics.com/sitemap
E-Mail Contact Page: http://www.dontronics.com/email
Web Camera Page: http://www.dontronics.com/webcam
No More Damn Spam: http://www.dontronics.com/spam

USB Isolator 1000VDC For Protecting Your PC OR Laptop
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/usb-iso-low-full-speed-usb-isolator.html

These products will reduce in price by 5% every month:
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/minus-5-every-month.html
 
On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.
My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copper.aspx


Cheers Don...


======================
 
On 27/10/2010 8:51 PM, B J Foster wrote:
On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?
from

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ikanos-Unveils-100-Mbps-DSL-You-Probably-Wont-Ever-See-111097?nocomment=1

While lab tests of faster DSL technology are well and good, most of this
technology will take years to leave the lab, *requires multiple pairs
the average home may not have*, and *like all DSL -- will remain highly
distance constrained* -- making it all-but-useless for the millions of
U.S. residents on long loop lenths.

Nice lab experiment but probably useless in practice.

"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copper.aspx
500 metres? So, if you can't piss on the exchange from your house, then
you're out of luck.

There are all sorts of quirky schemes to wring the last drop out of
copper lines, but few, if any, will ever be put into practice.

Its like those competitions where they get a WiFi connection over 50Km,
technically interesting but useless in practice.
 
On 2010/10/27 20:51, The Liberal Party Stooge wrote:
On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?


"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copper.aspx



Cheers Don...


======================
ADSL2+ can do 20mbs, how many actually get any where near that?

And there's a reason for that.
 
On 27/10/2010 10:22 PM, keithr wrote:
On 27/10/2010 8:51 PM, B J Foster wrote:
On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

from

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ikanos-Unveils-100-Mbps-DSL-You-Probably-Wont-Ever-See-111097?nocomment=1


While lab tests of faster DSL technology are well and good, most of this
technology will take years to leave the lab, *requires multiple pairs
the average home may not have*, and *like all DSL -- will remain highly
distance constrained* -- making it all-but-useless for the millions of
U.S. residents on long loop lenths.

Nice lab experiment but probably useless in practice.
What do you need 100Mbps for anyway, idiot?


"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded
copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copper.aspx


500 metres? So, if you can't piss on the exchange from your house, then
you're out of luck.

There are all sorts of quirky schemes to wring the last drop out of
copper lines, but few, if any, will ever be put into practice.

Its like those competitions where they get a WiFi connection over 50Km,
technically interesting but useless in practice.
 
On 28/10/2010 12:35 AM, son of a bitch wrote:
On 2010/10/27 20:51, The Liberal Party Stooge wrote:
On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?


"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded
copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copper.aspx




Cheers Don...


======================




ADSL2+ can do 20mbs, how many actually get any where near that?

And there's a reason for that.
I can't use all my available download speed now. there are heaps of slow
servers about.
 
So you resort to name calling because someone points out
your so called solution is blatantly inferior to fibre
optic?.
 
On Oct 27, 10:22 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 27/10/2010 8:51 PM, B J Foster wrote:

On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

from

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ikanos-Unveils-100-Mbps-DSL-You-Pr...

While lab tests of faster DSL technology are well and good, most of this
technology will take years to leave the lab,
Even if it takes 1 more year in the lab and 1 more year to get in
production/field test and 2 more years to deploy it will beat the NBN.

VHDSL already runs at 100Mbit symetrical at 250m, and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m. The new schemes double those distances.

ADSL2+ has the DSLAM installed in the exchange, VHDSL is designed to
be also allow installation in the street box.(to get closer to the
customer)

The coalitions 5.5 billion policy for guranteeing 12Mbit involved
simply upgrading the old exhanges, installing a fibre backbone and
putting in VHDSL in the street some instances. (about 1.8 billion of
the cost, the rest being satelite and Wireless)

The new tech would now allow the coalitions policy to probably
gurantee a minium of 25Mbit symetrical (worst case) and up to 100Mbit
for the same cost. Probably a few billion extra would close the gap
to guranteeing nearly 100Mbit for everyone.

The new technology now means that folks 2km from the exchange can get
30Mbit not just those 1.0km and those at 4km can now get 12-15Mbit.

For those greater than 2km from the exchange (very few in number) the
DSLAM can be installed at the streetbox.


*requires multiple pairs
the average home may not have*, and *like all DSL -- will remain highly
distance constrained* -- making it all-but-useless for the millions of
U.S. residents on long loop lenths.
Do you think that fibre breakout boxes will be installed in the
streetboxes or only at the exchange?

I would say there is a shit heap of work to be done near or at the
streetboxes with fibre so there is no disasdvantage to VHDSL at the
streetbox versus fibre. Either way you've got to frig armount at the
streetbox.
 
On Oct 28, 12:35 am, son of a bitch <bitchin_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2010/10/27 20:51, The Liberal Party Stooge wrote:





On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copp....

Cheers Don...

=====================
ADSL2+ can do 20mbs, how many actually get any where near that?
ADSL 2+ release "M" can do 30Mbit download and 3.6Mit upload up to 1km
(maybe more if the line is good). Around 15Mbit at 2km and 6 Mbit at
4km. Something called a loop extender can double that for remote
customers.

If more is needed VHDSL can provide 100Mbit at 250m and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m (symetrical) rolling of as for ADSL 2+ after
that. VHDSL is designed for installation in the streetbox rather than
the exhange to get close to the customer.
 
Eunometic wrote
keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote
B J Foster wrote
Don McKenzie wrote:

Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100
Mbps over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

from

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ikanos-Unveils-100-Mbps-DSL-You-Pr...

While lab tests of faster DSL technology are well and good,
most of this technology will take years to leave the lab,

Even if it takes 1 more year in the lab and 1 more year to get in
production/field test and 2 more years to deploy it will beat the NBN.
Nope, because that 100Mbps nees more than one copper pair and the
distance you get anything like 100Mbps over is nothing like whats needed.

VHDSL already runs at 100Mbit symetrical at 250m, and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m. The new schemes double those distances.
No it doesnt on a single copper pair.

ADSL2+ has the DSLAM installed in the exchange, VHDSL is designed to
be also allow installation in the street box.(to get closer to the customer)
Yes, but we have chose not to go for FTTN.

The coalitions 5.5 billion policy for guranteeing 12Mbit involved
simply upgrading the old exhanges, installing a fibre backbone
and putting in VHDSL in the street some instances. (about
1.8 billion of the cost, the rest being satelite and Wireless)
And even you should have noticed that they arent the govt.

The new tech would now allow the coalitions policy to probably gurantee a
minium of 25Mbit symetrical (worst case) and up to 100Mbit for the same cost.
Nope, because it uses more than one pair.

Probably a few billion extra would close the gap to guranteeing nearly 100Mbit for everyone.
Nope, because there just arent enough copper pairs for that.

The new technology now means that folks 2km from the exchange can get
30Mbit not just those 1.0km and those at 4km can now get 12-15Mbit.
Nope, because there arent enough pairs.

For those greater than 2km from the exchange (very few in number)
Thats another lie.

the DSLAM can be installed at the streetbox.

*requires multiple pairs the average home may not have*,
And the street cables certainly dont have.

and *like all DSL -- will remain highly distance constrained* -- making
it all-but-useless for the millions of U.S. residents on long loop lenths.

Do you think that fibre breakout boxes will be installed in the streetboxes or only at the exchange?
Doesnt fix the multiple pairs requirement.

I would say there is a shit heap of work to be done near or at the streetboxes
with fibre so there is no disasdvantage to VHDSL at the streetbox versus fibre.
More fool you, there arent the copper pairs.

Either way you've got to frig armount at the streetbox.
Thats FTTN, we have decided not to go that route.
 
Eunometic wrote:
On Oct 28, 12:35 am, son of a bitch <bitchin_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2010/10/27 20:51, The Liberal Party Stooge wrote:





On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100
Mbps over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the
performance of fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home,"
said John Quigley, CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines
and created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped
DSLAM this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver
speeds 850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of
"bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copp...

Cheers Don...

======================

ADSL2+ can do 20mbs, how many actually get any where near that?

ADSL 2+ release "M" can do 30Mbit download and 3.6Mit upload up to 1km
(maybe more if the line is good). Around 15Mbit at 2km and 6 Mbit at
4km. Something called a loop extender can double that for remote
customers.

If more is needed VHDSL can provide 100Mbit at 250m and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m (symetrical) rolling of as for ADSL 2+ after
that. VHDSL is designed for installation in the streetbox rather than
the exhange to get close to the customer.
Thats FTTN, we decided to not go that route and even the coalition isnt proposing that.
 
On 2010/10/28 11:40, Eunometic wrote:
On Oct 28, 12:35 am, son of a bitch<bitchin_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2010/10/27 20:51, The Liberal Party Stooge wrote:





On 27/10/2010 8:45 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100 Mbps
over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?

"Ikanos' NodeScale Vectoring technology will deliver the performance of
fibre at one-tenth the cost of fibre-to-the-home," said John Quigley,
CEO and president at Ikanos.

The technology analysed interference between paired copper lines and
created "compensation signals" that cancelled out noise, Ikanos
explained.

ZTE Corporation was demonstrating its first NodeScale equipped DSLAM
this week at the Broadband World Forum in Paris, France.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) also trotted out its new "phantom"
noise-cancelling DSL technology, which it claimed could deliver speeds
850 Mbps over 400 metres and 750 Mbps over 500 metres of "bonded copper".

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/236611,us-telco-claims-100-mbps-on-copp...

Cheers Don...

======================

ADSL2+ can do 20mbs, how many actually get any where near that?

ADSL 2+ release "M" can do 30Mbit download and 3.6Mit upload up to 1km
(maybe more if the line is good). Around 15Mbit at 2km and 6 Mbit at
4km. Something called a loop extender can double that for remote
customers.

If more is needed VHDSL can provide 100Mbit at 250m and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m (symetrical) rolling of as for ADSL 2+ after
that. VHDSL is designed for installation in the streetbox rather than
the exhange to get close to the customer.
In OZ, People can be 2.5 to 5 KM away from the Exchange even in Cities.
If you're not a Major Capital, I would expect 5 Kays to be
stones throw. Which means, for more than 50% of the People you would
be NO better off than what is available now.
 
Eunometic wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
Eunometic wrote
keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote
B J Foster wrote
Don McKenzie wrote

Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper

Sweating copper, chasing fibre.

US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100
Mbps over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.

My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?

What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead? from

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ikanos-Unveils-100-Mbps-DSL-You-Pr...
While lab tests of faster DSL technology are well and good,
most of this technology will take years to leave the lab,

Even if it takes 1 more year in the lab and 1 more year to get in
production/field test and 2 more years to deploy it will beat the NBN.

Nope, because that 100Mbps nees more than one copper pair and the
distance you get anything like 100Mbps over is nothing like whats needed.

Incorrect on your part.
Nope, fact.

The Ikanos technology relies on one standard copper pair only.
Wrong.

It works by analysing cross talk and compensating.
Wrong.

VHDSL already runs at 100Mbit symetrical at 250m, and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m. The new schemes double those distances.

No it doesnt on a single copper pair.

VHDSL already does used only one pair,
Yes, that comment was on the second sentence, thats why it was after it.

and has been doing so for years ON A SINGLE COPPER PAIR.
Pity about the pathetic distances.

These new standards, VHDSL 2+ seems to be the jargon, seem
to offer the VHDSL speeds of 100Mbit over twice the distance.
No they dont.

And even if they did, the NBN would STILL leave them for dead anyway.

ADSL2+ has the DSLAM installed in the exchange, VHDSL is designed to
be also allow installation in the street box.(to get closer to the customer)

Yes, but we have chose not to go for FTTN.

The coalitions 5.5 billion policy for guranteeing 12Mbit involved
simply upgrading the old exhanges, installing a fibre backbone
and putting in VHDSL in the street some instances. (about
1.8 billion of the cost, the rest being satelite and Wireless)

And even you should have noticed that they arent the govt.

The new tech would now allow the coalitions policy to probably gurantee a
minium of 25Mbit symetrical (worst case) and up to 100Mbit for the same cost.

Nope, because it uses more than one pair.

You've misread that.
Nope.

It uses one pair.
Nope.

The Siemens-Nokia technology, which offers up to 850Mbit over copper pairs,
can use multiple pairs if desired to get the fill speed but doesn't have to.
Mindlessly silly.

Probably a few billion extra would close the gap to guranteeing nearly 100Mbit for everyone.

Nope, because there just arent enough copper pairs for that.

Rest of off tack Rod Speed Meanderings snipped.
More of your pathetic excuse for lying bullshit.

Fucking idiot.
Your sig is sposed to have a line with just -- in front of it, fuckwit.
 
On Oct 28, 2:01 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
Eunometic wrote





keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote
B J Foster wrote
Don McKenzie wrote:
Oct 27, 2010 6:52 AM (1 hour ago)
US telco claims 100 Mbps on copper
Sweating copper, chasing fibre.
US telecommunications vendor Ikanos this week released NodeScale
Vectoring which it claimed could deliver broadband speeds of 100
Mbps over existing copper digital subscriber line (DSL) networks.
My goodness me, what on earth will they *use* it for?
What will the Labor idiots spend the money on instead?
from
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ikanos-Unveils-100-Mbps-DSL-You-Pr....
While lab tests of faster DSL technology are well and good,
most of this technology will take years to leave the lab,
Even if it takes 1 more year in the lab and 1 more year to get in
production/field test and 2 more years to deploy it will beat the NBN.

Nope, because that 100Mbps nees more than one copper pair and the
distance you get anything like 100Mbps over is nothing like whats needed.
Incorrect on your part.

The Ikanos technology relies on one standard copper pair only. It
works by analysing cross talk and compensating.

VHDSL already runs at 100Mbit symetrical at 250m, and 50Mbit at 500m
and 25Mbit at 1000m.  The new schemes double those distances.

No it doesnt on a single copper pair.
VHDSL already does used only one pair, and has been doing so for years
ON A SINGLE COPPER PAIR.

These new standards, VHDSL 2+ seems to be the jargon, seem to offer
the VHDSL speeds of 100Mbit over twice the distance.


ADSL2+ has the DSLAM installed in the exchange,  VHDSL is designed to
be also allow installation in the street box.(to get closer to the customer)

Yes, but we have chose not to go for FTTN.

The coalitions 5.5 billion policy for guranteeing 12Mbit involved
simply upgrading the old exhanges, installing a fibre backbone
and putting in VHDSL in the street some instances.  (about
1.8 billion of the cost, the rest being satelite and Wireless)

And even you should have noticed that they arent the govt.

The new tech would now allow the coalitions policy to probably gurantee a
minium of 25Mbit symetrical (worst case) and up to 100Mbit for the same cost.

Nope, because it uses more than one pair.
You've misread that. It uses one pair.

The Siemens-Nokia technology, which offers up to 850Mbit over copper
pairs, can use multiple pairs if desired to get the fill speed but
doesn't have to.


Probably a few billion extra would close the gap to guranteeing nearly 100Mbit for everyone.

Nope, because there just arent enough copper pairs for that.
Rest of off tack Rod Speed Meanderings snipped.

Fucking idiot.
 
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:02:11 +1100, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

SNIP
:
:Thats FTTN, we decided to not go that route and even the coalition isnt
proposing that.
:

And the reason they didn't go for FTTN was purely to satisfy Telstra's
competitors and no other reason.

Imagine this, Telstra still own the copper and all of the competitors are
allowed access to it at a cost determined by the ACCC. If FTTN were adopted
Telstra would say "right we don't need to maintain all that copper between the
exchange and the nodes now. If you others want to compete then install your own
fibre to your own nodes. We will only continue to maintain the copper between
the nodes and the customers". And those competitors would bitch like crazy at
the expense they would be up for and lobby like hell to overturn it and go for
something which did not rely upon copper for any part of the route. And that is
actually what happened when the first NBN proposed by Labor was based on FTTN.

Of course NBNCo could still have bought the copper and the underground
infrastructure for around $11B as they are now going to do anyway, and still
have implemented an NBN using FTTN. However, this would mean they still had
problem in that the only organisation which had the relevant workforce and
structures to maintain the copper end section was Telstra, and that was a big
NO-NO as far as the private competitors were concerned. They wanted a system
where Telstra had no role or ownership of any part of it. I can't say I really
blame them, but that is hardly a good reason to blow $43B when around $25B
(including the $11B for Telstra's infrastructure) would have done the job.
 
On 28/10/2010 9:59 AM, Mark Harriss wrote:
So you resort to name calling because someone points out
your so called solution is blatantly inferior to fibre
optic?.
Solution for *what*? Exactly.

PS: You too can earn a title. It's easy.
 
On 28/10/2010 2:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
Either way you've got to frig armount at the streetbox.
Thats FTTN, we have decided not to go that route.
We?
 
On 28/10/2010 3:44 PM, Eunometic wrote:
The new tech would now allow the coalitions policy to probably gurantee a
minium of 25Mbit symetrical (worst case) and up to 100Mbit for the same cost.

Nope, because it uses more than one pair.
You've misread that. It uses one pair.

The Siemens-Nokia technology, which offers up to 850Mbit over copper
pairs, can use multiple pairs if desired to get the fill speed but
doesn't have to.
Excellent research.

It would be financially irresponsible for government to start spending
tens of billions of dollars before a cost-benefit analysis is done,
including VDSL as an option. No listed company would ever do such a
thing - the CEO and the board would be fired.
 
B J Foster wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Either way you've got to frig armount at the streetbox.

Thats FTTN, we have decided not to go that route.

We?
The country, stupid.
 
B J Foster wrote
Eunometic wrote

The new tech would now allow the coalitions policy to probably gurantee a minium of 25Mbit symetrical (worst case)
and up to 100Mbit for the same cost.

Nope, because it uses more than one pair.

You've misread that. It uses one pair.
Another lie.

The Siemens-Nokia technology, which offers up to 850Mbit over copper
pairs, can use multiple pairs if desired to get the fill speed but doesn't have to.
You dont get anything like 850Mb over copper pairs at any useful distance.

Excellent research.
Nope, just more flagrantly misleading hype.

It would be financially irresponsible for government to start spending tens of billions of dollars before a
cost-benefit analysis is done, including VDSL as an option. No listed company would ever do such a thing
Another bare faced lie. BOTH Optarse and Telstra did just that with their cable services.

- the CEO and the board would be fired.

Have fun explaining why neither the Optarse or the Telstra or the Foxtel CEO or board was.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top