U.S. Startup Has Already Released Reflective Sulfur In Stratosphere By Balloon...

[Fred Bloggs]

Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about


Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.

Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.

Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.

Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:46:31 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.
Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain.. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.

Researchers at NOAA and NASA have some pretty hard numbers extracted from global reduction of atmosphere aerosols and particulate pollution, in addition to shading effects from commercial aircraft emissions and contrails, over the past 20 years, so they can pretty accurately predict the global cooling effects of synthetic shading. The problem is there\'s much more to it than just cooling effects. Physicists tend to ignore the biosphere, mainly because they know nothing about it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:46:31 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.
Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain.. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.

Researchers at NOAA and NASA have some pretty hard numbers extracted from global reduction of atmosphere aerosols and particulate pollution, in addition to shading effects from commercial aircraft emissions and contrails, over the past 20 years, so they can pretty accurately predict the global cooling effects of synthetic shading. The problem is there\'s much more to it than just cooling effects. Physicists tend to ignore the biosphere, mainly because they know nothing about it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:46:31 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.
Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain.. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.

Researchers at NOAA and NASA have some pretty hard numbers extracted from global reduction of atmosphere aerosols and particulate pollution, in addition to shading effects from commercial aircraft emissions and contrails, over the past 20 years, so they can pretty accurately predict the global cooling effects of synthetic shading. The problem is there\'s much more to it than just cooling effects. Physicists tend to ignore the biosphere, mainly because they know nothing about it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:57:25 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:46:31 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.
Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.
Researchers at NOAA and NASA have some pretty hard numbers extracted from global reduction of atmosphere aerosols and particulate pollution, in addition to shading effects from commercial aircraft emissions and contrails, over the past 20 years, so they can pretty accurately predict the global cooling effects of synthetic shading. The problem is there\'s much more to it than just cooling effects. Physicists tend to ignore the biosphere, mainly because they know nothing about it.

\"Reflective sulphur in the atmosphere\" is likely to mean small droplets of sulphuric acid. Power stations burning sulphur-rich coal injected a lot of that into the atmosphere until the 1970\'s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo

injected rather more in 1991. That research has already been done.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:57:25 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:46:31 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.
Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.
Researchers at NOAA and NASA have some pretty hard numbers extracted from global reduction of atmosphere aerosols and particulate pollution, in addition to shading effects from commercial aircraft emissions and contrails, over the past 20 years, so they can pretty accurately predict the global cooling effects of synthetic shading. The problem is there\'s much more to it than just cooling effects. Physicists tend to ignore the biosphere, mainly because they know nothing about it.

\"Reflective sulphur in the atmosphere\" is likely to mean small droplets of sulphuric acid. Power stations burning sulphur-rich coal injected a lot of that into the atmosphere until the 1970\'s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo

injected rather more in 1991. That research has already been done.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:57:25 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 8:46:31 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 12:26:12 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Controversial and potentially risky? They don\'t care:

\"We make reflective, high-altitude, biodegradable clouds that cool the planet. Mimicking natural processes, our \"shiny clouds\" are going to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Specifically: we release a natural compound via reusable balloons to create reflective clouds in the stratosphere. They\'re *really* effective: 1 gram of our clouds offsets the warming that 1 ton of CO₂ emissions creates for a year. After three years, our clouds compost and settle back to Earth.

Because we deliver our clouds via reusable balloons, we\'re able to offset CO₂ at <1% of the cost of other solutions. Uniquely, we can also scale to offset *all* of global warming.

We can offset warming from all global annual CO₂ emissions with ~$30 million of our clouds, and every $1 billion of our clouds will cool the world by ~0.1°F!\"

Oooooookay- let\'s see how this pans out.

https://makesunsets.com/pages/about

Hysterical perspective:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis

A bunch of people pissed it\'s not going to cost trillions $$$, like those ridiculous fools who want to extract CO2 from air with blowers.
Science fiction got there first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_Shock_(novel)

When we last dumped a load of SO2 in the stratosphere it caused acid rain. This new prescription probably comes with some story about not having any side effects, but so far it is just snake oil, or a stratospheric bubble of it.
Researchers at NOAA and NASA have some pretty hard numbers extracted from global reduction of atmosphere aerosols and particulate pollution, in addition to shading effects from commercial aircraft emissions and contrails, over the past 20 years, so they can pretty accurately predict the global cooling effects of synthetic shading. The problem is there\'s much more to it than just cooling effects. Physicists tend to ignore the biosphere, mainly because they know nothing about it.

\"Reflective sulphur in the atmosphere\" is likely to mean small droplets of sulphuric acid. Power stations burning sulphur-rich coal injected a lot of that into the atmosphere until the 1970\'s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo

injected rather more in 1991. That research has already been done.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney