Two doctors detail Biden\'s rapid cognitive decline...

[Flyguy]

Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s rapid cognitive decline:
https://rudygiulianics.com/podcast-common-sense/
Alan Mazurek is a board-certified neurologist at Mt. Sinai Hospital.
Jay Fleitman is board-certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, and Sleep Medicine.

The major categories of cognitive reasoning include:

Memory loss
Word finding problems
Other language and number processing issues
Disorientation with people, places and time
Inappropriate behavior

For example, Biden forgot both Obama\'s and Sanders\' names, thought that MLK and the Kennedys were murdered in the late \'70s (Biden is sure of this because this is when he proposed to his wife, unfortunately, it was his FIRST wife, not Jill), has a long history of inappropriate touching and even rape, doesn\'t know what state he is in, he forgot the name of the coronavirus, and has claimed that there are 720 million women in the country. And this is just a very short list of his \"gaffes\" - the guy is in rapid mental decline, which is why he hides out in his basement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuMR1wdBFDI

 

[whit3rd]

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
> Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical quaifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

 

[Flyguy]

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical quaifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

LOL! Clearly you guys have no meaningful answer for the obvious mental decline of Slow Joe. After all, his mental state IS a campaign issue.

 

[Ricketty C]

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:36:59 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:

Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s rapid cognitive decline:
https://rudygiulianics.com/podcast-common-sense/
Alan Mazurek is a board-certified neurologist at Mt. Sinai Hospital.
Jay Fleitman is board-certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, and Sleep Medicine.

The major categories of cognitive reasoning include:

Memory loss
Word finding problems
Other language and number processing issues
Disorientation with people, places and time
Inappropriate behavior

For example, Biden forgot both Obama\'s and Sanders\' names, thought that MLK and the Kennedys were murdered in the late \'70s (Biden is sure of this because this is when he proposed to his wife, unfortunately, it was his FIRST wife, not Jill), has a long history of inappropriate touching and even rape, doesn\'t know what state he is in, he forgot the name of the coronavirus, and has claimed that there are 720 million women in the country. And this is just a very short list of his \"gaffes\" - the guy is in rapid mental decline, which is why he hides out in his basement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuMR1wdBFDI

I think you misspelled the patient\'s name. That would be T-R-U-M-P. You need to get your facts straight.

Here is Joe Biden giving his acceptance speech of the Democratic nomination for President.

https://youtu.be/wgjMh-DbOzk

I like the way he talks. You should get used to it. You are going to hear that a lot over the next eight years.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[John Doe]

But of course you don\'t need to be a doctor to see it.
Everybody who isn\'t a political zealot can see it.
And then they nominated a 2% primary candidate for the vice president.

I couldn\'t care less about political parties, but obviously
Democrats have lost it. They needed to at least nominate a
mainstream running mate since everybody knows Joseph Biden will not
be a functioning president. It\'s a shame, to those of us who do not
wish for America\'s downfall. We need at least two viable political
parties.

America hating foreigners should be screaming bloody murder about
Joseph Biden, a candidate for president of the United States, who is
obviously suffering from dementia. How is that good for anybody in
the world? But they don\'t say a word against it, their zealot
politics rule everything about them.



Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s rapid cognitive decline:
https://rudygiulianics.com/podcast-common-sense/
Alan Mazurek is a board-certified neurologist at Mt. Sinai Hospital.
Jay Fleitman is board-certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, and Sleep Medicine.

The major categories of cognitive reasoning include:

Memory loss
Word finding problems
Other language and number processing issues
Disorientation with people, places and time
Inappropriate behavior

For example, Biden forgot both Obama\'s and Sanders\' names, thought that MLK and the Kennedys were murdered in the late \'70s (Biden is sure of this because this is when he proposed to his wife, unfortunately, it was his FIRST wife, not Jill), has a long history of inappropriate touching and even rape, doesn\'t know what state he is in, he forgot the name of the coronavirus, and has claimed that there are 720 million women in the country. And this is just a very short list of his \"gaffes\" - the guy is in rapid mental decline, which is why he hides out in his basement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuMR1wdBFDI

 

[Ricketty C]

On Friday, August 21, 2020 at 4:56:43 AM UTC-4, John Doe wrote:

But of course you don\'t need to be a doctor to see it.
Everybody who isn\'t a political zealot can see it.
And then they nominated a 2% primary candidate for the vice president.

I couldn\'t care less about political parties, but obviously
Democrats have lost it. They needed to at least nominate a
mainstream running mate since everybody knows Joseph Biden will not
be a functioning president. It\'s a shame, to those of us who do not
wish for America\'s downfall. We need at least two viable political
parties.

America hating foreigners should be screaming bloody murder about
Joseph Biden, a candidate for president of the United States, who is
obviously suffering from dementia. How is that good for anybody in
the world? But they don\'t say a word against it, their zealot
politics rule everything about them.

I know! Why don\'t the anti-American\'s help out when they can? It\'s not like anyone in this country hates them back!

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Clive Arthur]

On 21/08/2020 09:56, John Doe wrote:

America hating foreigners should be screaming bloody murder about
Joseph Biden, a candidate for president of the United States, who is
obviously suffering from dementia.

No, he isn\'t, clearly. HTH. HAND.

But Reagan, Dubya, Trump. What is it with you guys and barking-mad
presidents?

Trouble is, like most things American, it\'s starting to catch on here, too.

--
Cheers
Clive

 

[Flyguy]

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical quaifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.

 

[John Robertson]

On 2020/08/22 9:10 a.m., Flyguy wrote:

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical quaifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.

This would be assuming that Mr Giuliani is an unbiased journalist.

John

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:10:45 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical qualifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.

Which is to say that it isn\'t based on a diagnostic interview with Joe Biden, which means that if the doctors were highly qualified in making that sort of assessment, they\'d be disbarred for publishing something that purported to be such an assessment when it wasn\'t based on such an interview.

This is likely to be similar to the climate change denial statements published by prominent scientist, who are highly qualified in some other branch of science, and know very little about climate science., but do need money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:46:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:10:45 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical qualifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.
Which is to say that it isn\'t based on a diagnostic interview with Joe Biden, which means that if the doctors were highly qualified in making that sort of assessment, they\'d be disbarred for publishing something that purported to be such an assessment when it wasn\'t based on such an interview.

This is likely to be similar to the climate change denial statements published by prominent scientist, who are highly qualified in some other branch of science, and know very little about climate science., but do need money..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

More BULSHIT from SL0W MAN - you obviously didn\'t watch the podcast, too.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:09:17 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:46:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:10:45 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical qualifications aren\'t important..

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.

Which is to say that it isn\'t based on a diagnostic interview with Joe Biden, which means that if the doctors were highly qualified in making that sort of assessment, they\'d be disbarred for publishing something that purported to be such an assessment when it wasn\'t based on such an interview.

This is likely to be similar to the climate change denial statements published by prominent scientist, who are highly qualified in some other branch of science, and know very little about climate science., but do need money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

snipped the usual abuse> you obviously didn\'t watch the podcast, too.

Why bother? You recommended it, so it is clearly rubbish, as is the underlying proposition that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia.

I can\'t imagine why you think that anybody would take you seriously enough to watch something you recommended. You are so obviously cognitively challenged - you can\'t even spell \"bullshit\" correctly - that your only utility lies in letting us jeer at the particularly idiotic misapprehensions you choose to publish here.

Of course this is just one of the very large number of indisputable facts that you don\'t seem to know. You make John Larkin look well-informed.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Gerhard Hoffmann]

Am 23.08.20 um 07:08 schrieb Flyguy:

If Biden was confident he would pass he would take it - but he isn\'t and won\'t. And all of the video of his memory, language and behavior problems show conclusively why. Anybody with a 9 year old intelligence level could figure that one out - guess that leaves you out, which is why you call yourself SL0W MAN.

Hi, Lord Of The Flies!

I\'m pretty confident that I can eat with fork & knife.
But when some demented politician asked me to prove it, I\'d
kick him into the balls, with both boots at once.
(assuming there is still something kickable left.)
And I mean my cross motorcycle boots.

My lil daughter recognized an elephant at 2 1/2. Your
CrackPotus is proud that he can still perform that.
WOW! I\'m impressed.

And Slowman is usually right in the matter itself, his only
drawback is that he is so predictable when it goes against JL.

cheers, Gerhard

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:08:09 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:37:01 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:09:12 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 5:13:37 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/08/20 4:36 p.m., Flyguy wrote:

<snip>

When your opponent is spreading fatuous lying propaganda about you suffering from dementia, you aren\'t going to be particularly polite about any suggestion that would imply that there was any truth in the claim, or that it deserved to be taken seriously.

Flyguy is remarkably stupid, but even he should be able to work that out.

If Biden was confident he would pass he would take it - but he isn\'t and won\'t.

I\'m sure that he is perfectly confident that he could take it and pass, but even an idiot like you should be able to work out that he wouldn\'t dignify the accusation by taking it that seriously.

>And all of the video of his memory, language and behavior problems show conclusively why.

Presumably they demonstrate that it doesn\'t take much skill at video-editing to make it look as if somebody has a problem, as is well-known

> Anybody with a 9 year old intelligence level could figure that one out - guess that leaves you out.

Since - unlike you - I\'ve got enough intelligence to work what is actually going on, I am left out of the small and stupid cohort that might fall for this trivial trick.

I could congratulate you for proving - once again - that you are dimmest kind of gullible sucker, and for you application to the task of making this blindingly obvious, but it might encourage you to persist in your efforts to get quite the wrong kind of attention.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 10:24:25 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:09:17 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:46:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:10:45 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information.. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical qualifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.

Which is to say that it isn\'t based on a diagnostic interview with Joe Biden, which means that if the doctors were highly qualified in making that sort of assessment, they\'d be disbarred for publishing something that purported to be such an assessment when it wasn\'t based on such an interview.

This is likely to be similar to the climate change denial statements published by prominent scientist, who are highly qualified in some other branch of science, and know very little about climate science., but do need money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

snipped the usual abuse> you obviously didn\'t watch the podcast, too.

Why bother? You recommended it, so it is clearly rubbish, as is the underlying proposition that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia.

I can\'t imagine why you think that anybody would take you seriously enough to watch something you recommended. You are so obviously cognitively challenged - you can\'t even spell \"bullshit\" correctly - that your only utility lies in letting us jeer at the particularly idiotic misapprehensions you choose to publish here.

Of course this is just one of the very large number of indisputable facts that you don\'t seem to know. You make John Larkin look well-informed.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

Sure, WHY watch something that you are opining about? Well, SL0W MAN, it\'s called BELIEVABILITY (not to mention honesty and integrity), which you clearly don\'t have! That is WHY so much of what you say is BULLSHIT (see, asshole, no typos!).

 

[Flyguy]

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 1:34:39 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:08:09 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:37:01 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:09:12 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 5:13:37 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/08/20 4:36 p.m., Flyguy wrote:
snip
When your opponent is spreading fatuous lying propaganda about you suffering from dementia, you aren\'t going to be particularly polite about any suggestion that would imply that there was any truth in the claim, or that it deserved to be taken seriously.

Flyguy is remarkably stupid, but even he should be able to work that out.

If Biden was confident he would pass he would take it - but he isn\'t and won\'t.
I\'m sure that he is perfectly confident that he could take it and pass, but even an idiot like you should be able to work out that he wouldn\'t dignify the accusation by taking it that seriously.
And all of the video of his memory, language and behavior problems show conclusively why.
Presumably they demonstrate that it doesn\'t take much skill at video-editing to make it look as if somebody has a problem, as is well-known

Anybody with a 9 year old intelligence level could figure that one out - guess that leaves you out.

Since - unlike you - I\'ve got enough intelligence to work what is actually going on, I am left out of the small and stupid cohort that might fall for this trivial trick.

I could congratulate you for proving - once again - that you are dimmest kind of gullible sucker, and for you application to the task of making this blindingly obvious, but it might encourage you to persist in your efforts to get quite the wrong kind of attention.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

AGAIN, SL0W MAN, you are talking WITHOUT THINKING! Your opinions on something you HAVEN\'T WATCHED are MEANINGLESS in the extreme. But, hey, that is YOU: MEANINGLESS!!

 

[Flyguy]

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 6:14:16 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 1:34:39 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:08:09 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:37:01 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:09:12 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 5:13:37 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/08/20 4:36 p.m., Flyguy wrote:
snip
When your opponent is spreading fatuous lying propaganda about you suffering from dementia, you aren\'t going to be particularly polite about any suggestion that would imply that there was any truth in the claim, or that it deserved to be taken seriously.

Flyguy is remarkably stupid, but even he should be able to work that out.

If Biden was confident he would pass he would take it - but he isn\'t and won\'t.
I\'m sure that he is perfectly confident that he could take it and pass, but even an idiot like you should be able to work out that he wouldn\'t dignify the accusation by taking it that seriously.
And all of the video of his memory, language and behavior problems show conclusively why.
Presumably they demonstrate that it doesn\'t take much skill at video-editing to make it look as if somebody has a problem, as is well-known

Anybody with a 9 year old intelligence level could figure that one out - guess that leaves you out.

Since - unlike you - I\'ve got enough intelligence to work what is actually going on, I am left out of the small and stupid cohort that might fall for this trivial trick.

I could congratulate you for proving - once again - that you are dimmest kind of gullible sucker, and for you application to the task of making this blindingly obvious, but it might encourage you to persist in your efforts to get quite the wrong kind of attention.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

AGAIN, SL0W MAN, you are talking WITHOUT THINKING! Your opinions on something you HAVEN\'T WATCHED are MEANINGLESS in the extreme. But, hey, that is YOU: MEANINGLESS!!

I\'ll make it REAL EASY for SL0W MAN: this is only 13 seconds long:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRtWGRgR5Aw

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, August 24, 2020 at 11:12:02 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 10:24:25 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:09:17 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:46:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:10:45 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:36:59 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Two highly qualified doctors detail Biden\'s r...

If it were a proper diagnosis, that\'d be confidential information. So, it\'s
an election-year smear, and medical qualifications aren\'t important.

Biden\'s mental decline and Trump\'s impending mental ascension
are bits of work by the recently-released Roger Stone, perhaps?

You obviously didn\'t watch the podcast - all the information they used to reach that diagnosis is in the public domain.

Which is to say that it isn\'t based on a diagnostic interview with Joe Biden, which means that if the doctors were highly qualified in making that sort of assessment, they\'d be disbarred for publishing something that purported to be such an assessment when it wasn\'t based on such an interview.

This is likely to be similar to the climate change denial statements published by prominent scientist, who are highly qualified in some other branch of science, and know very little about climate science., but do need money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

snipped the usual abuse> you obviously didn\'t watch the podcast, too..

Why bother? You recommended it, so it is clearly rubbish, as is the underlying proposition that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia.

I can\'t imagine why you think that anybody would take you seriously enough to watch something you recommended. You are so obviously cognitively challenged - you can\'t even spell \"bullshit\" correctly - that your only utility lies in letting us jeer at the particularly idiotic misapprehensions you choose to publish here.

Of course this is just one of the very large number of indisputable facts that you don\'t seem to know. You make John Larkin look well-informed.

Sure, WHY watch something that you are opining about? Well, SL0W MAN, it\'s called BELIEVABILITY (not to mention honesty and integrity), which you clearly don\'t have! That is WHY so much of what you say is BULLSHIT (see, asshole, no typos!).

Actually, it is called \"credibility\". You evidently don\'t know anything about it. Ignoring obvious nonsense is a rational strategy, particularly when dealing with contemptible half-wits.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, August 24, 2020 at 11:14:16 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 1:34:39 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:08:09 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:37:01 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:09:12 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 5:13:37 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/08/20 4:36 p.m., Flyguy wrote:
snip
When your opponent is spreading fatuous lying propaganda about you suffering from dementia, you aren\'t going to be particularly polite about any suggestion that would imply that there was any truth in the claim, or that it deserved to be taken seriously.

Flyguy is remarkably stupid, but even he should be able to work that out.

If Biden was confident he would pass he would take it - but he isn\'t and won\'t.
I\'m sure that he is perfectly confident that he could take it and pass, but even an idiot like you should be able to work out that he wouldn\'t dignify the accusation by taking it that seriously.
And all of the video of his memory, language and behavior problems show conclusively why.
Presumably they demonstrate that it doesn\'t take much skill at video-editing to make it look as if somebody has a problem, as is well-known

Anybody with a 9 year old intelligence level could figure that one out - guess that leaves you out.

Since - unlike you - I\'ve got enough intelligence to work what is actually going on, I am left out of the small and stupid cohort that might fall for this trivial trick.

I could congratulate you for proving - once again - that you are dimmest kind of gullible sucker, and for you application to the task of making this blindingly obvious, but it might encourage you to persist in your efforts to get quite the wrong kind of attention.

Again, you are talking WITHOUT THINKING!

How would you know?

>Your opinions on something you HAVEN\'T WATCHED are MEANINGLESS in the extreme. But, hey, that is YOU: MEANINGLESS!!

You may like to think so, but somebody who posts large upper case clearly doesn\'t have much grasp of what \"meaningless\" might mean,

If you weren\'t so remarkably stupid, you would have been able to work out what my post meant.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, August 24, 2020 at 11:22:02 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 6:14:16 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 1:34:39 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 3:08:09 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 7:37:01 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 2:09:12 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 5:13:37 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/08/20 4:36 p.m., Flyguy wrote:
snip
When your opponent is spreading fatuous lying propaganda about you suffering from dementia, you aren\'t going to be particularly polite about any suggestion that would imply that there was any truth in the claim, or that it deserved to be taken seriously.

Flyguy is remarkably stupid, but even he should be able to work that out.

If Biden was confident he would pass he would take it - but he isn\'t and won\'t.
I\'m sure that he is perfectly confident that he could take it and pass, but even an idiot like you should be able to work out that he wouldn\'t dignify the accusation by taking it that seriously.
And all of the video of his memory, language and behavior problems show conclusively why.
Presumably they demonstrate that it doesn\'t take much skill at video-editing to make it look as if somebody has a problem, as is well-known

Anybody with a 9 year old intelligence level could figure that one out - guess that leaves you out.

Since - unlike you - I\'ve got enough intelligence to work what is actually going on, I am left out of the small and stupid cohort that might fall for this trivial trick.

I could congratulate you for proving - once again - that you are dimmest kind of gullible sucker, and for you application to the task of making this blindingly obvious, but it might encourage you to persist in your efforts to get quite the wrong kind of attention.

<snip>

> I\'ll make it REAL EASY <snip>: this is only 13 seconds long:

Why waste even 13 seconds? It\'s not as if I\'m some kind of connoisseur of malicious video editing.

<snipped a youtube link>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney