Triacs in Parallel...

C

Cursitor Doom

Guest
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD
 
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:38:14 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Triacs are like SCRs, in that when the current drops close to zero, they cut off. You might need to do something to prevent this. You will also need to do something to balance the current anyway. How will you limit the current to 8 amps in either device? Any irregularity will cause more current to flow in one, than the other.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.
 
On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.

One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.
And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.
 
On Mon, 08 May 2023 21:49:17 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.

One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.

Buy identical parts, of course.

We\'ve made deals with distibutors to buy 20 parts off a reel so we can
test them, and then buy the rest of that exact reel.

And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.

Measure their voltage drops or temperatures to estimate sharing.
 
On Mon, 08 May 2023 14:08:39 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 21:49:17 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.

One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.

Buy identical parts, of course.

We\'ve made deals with distibutors to buy 20 parts off a reel so we can
test them, and then buy the rest of that exact reel.

And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.

Measure their voltage drops or temperatures to estimate sharing.

Okay..... but these aren\'t adjustable characteristics, so what do I do
with the resuts?
 
On Mon, 08 May 2023 23:08:03 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 14:08:39 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 21:49:17 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.

One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.

Buy identical parts, of course.

We\'ve made deals with distibutors to buy 20 parts off a reel so we can
test them, and then buy the rest of that exact reel.

And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.

Measure their voltage drops or temperatures to estimate sharing.

Okay..... but these aren\'t adjustable characteristics, so what do I do
with the resuts?

See if it works.
 
On Mon, 08 May 2023 15:59:26 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 23:08:03 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 14:08:39 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 21:49:17 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.

One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.

Buy identical parts, of course.

We\'ve made deals with distibutors to buy 20 parts off a reel so we can
test them, and then buy the rest of that exact reel.

And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.

Measure their voltage drops or temperatures to estimate sharing.

Okay..... but these aren\'t adjustable characteristics, so what do I do
with the resuts?

See if it works.

OK. I shall do so. Would you expect it to have a greater or lesser
chance of success than doing the same thing with - say for example -
regular power diodes?
BTW, The maximum load for these two triacs in parallel will be 13 Amps
between them. That\'s the worst case scenario which leaves 3 Amps to
spare (not sure if that\'s a good thing or a bad thing, though).
 
On Mon, 8 May 2023 11:54:46 -0700 (PDT), Ricky
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:38:14?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Triacs are like SCRs, in that when the current drops close to zero, they cut off. You might need to do something to prevent this. You will also need to do something to balance the current anyway. How will you limit the current to 8 amps in either device? Any irregularity will cause more current to flow in one, than the other.

Worst case draw will be 13A, so with one of them flat-out, the other
only needs to handle the other 5A. I\'m hoping such an imbalance as
that won\'t occur in practice (unless it\'s intentional because the
\'natural sharing\' didn\'t work out).
 
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 3:20:34 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD
Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.

Why would anyone expect them to have the same ohmic behavior? Semiconductors have large variations compared to many devices. This is exactly an area where people typically care about the worst case, and not at all about matching.

If the data sheet specifies the ohmic behavior enough to reliably match parts, then fine. But I bet a call to the manufacturer says, \"Don\'t do that!\"

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:49:26 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
jla...@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.
One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.
And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.

Even if it passes your test, why would you expect it to continue to pass with parts from different lots or with even small process changes?

If this is for some home project, then fine. But build in some sort of protection, like a fuse in line with each triac.

--

Rick C.

-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 5:15:06 PM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:49:26 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2023 12:18:12 -0700, John Larkin
jla...@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 08 May 2023 19:35:43 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:

Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

CD

Probably, but you could try it. Make sure both have hard gate drives
and a common heat sink.

At high currents, they will become more ohmic with positive TCs so
should share reasonably well. The zero-TC current should show up on
the data sheet.

Big potted power diodes are often a bunch of little diodes in
parallel.
One assumes they\'re all matched for barrier height profile, though.
And set so close together for minimum temperature difference?
I\'ll give it a go; got nothing to lose after all.
Even if it passes your test, why would you expect it to continue to pass with parts from different lots or with even small process changes?

Why would you need to match from different lots? You just need to match within the same lot, or perhaps pre-sort and pre-test them.
 
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14 AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).
 
On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.
 
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:57:37 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.

How many henries?
 
On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:29:11 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:57:37 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.
How many henries?
At what frequency?
 
On Tue, 9 May 2023 08:10:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Lee
<edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:29:11?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:57:37 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.
How many henries?
At what frequency?

Oh dear. I haven\'t done the sums yet and I have a feeling it\'s going
to end up implausibly huge. The frequency is 50Hz.
 
On Tue, 09 May 2023 16:38:58 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 9 May 2023 08:10:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Lee
edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:29:11?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:57:37 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.
How many henries?
At what frequency?

Oh dear. I haven\'t done the sums yet and I have a feeling it\'s going
to end up implausibly huge.

Or infinite if there is any DC component in the current.
 
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:06:24 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Tue, 09 May 2023 16:38:58 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com
wrote:

On Tue, 9 May 2023 08:10:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Lee
edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:29:11?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:57:37 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 11:38:14?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,

I guess this is going to be a non-starter, but here goes:
Can I put two BT137 8 Amp triacs in parallel and get a 16 Amp
capability from them?

Yeah, with a tiny bit of isolation, that\'ll work. For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.
How many henries?
At what frequency?

Oh dear. I haven\'t done the sums yet and I have a feeling it\'s going
to end up implausibly huge.

Or infinite if there is any DC component in the current.

I don\'t think I can spare that much wire.
 
On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 8:10:09 AM UTC-7, Ed Lee wrote:
On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:29:11 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2023 09:57:37 +0100, Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2023 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

... For paralleling diodes
(and preventing current-hog problems) it takes a bit of series inductance for
each diode. That should work for triacs, too (you don\'t get normal triggering
on slower device #2 if device #1 has acheved low-terminal-voltage already,
because triggering is less effective if main terminal voltage drop is low).

That\'s an interesting idea, using a bit of inductance to limit the
current through each triac to <8A. Damn sight more practical than
power resistors! Well done. I might just use that.
How many henries?
At what frequency?

There\'s reason to believe the current-hog positive feedback that happens
in diodes (and transistors) isn\'t present in thyristors, so my thought on the
matching was only to limit dI/dt during the (zero-voltage switch) trigger, which might last 100us,
not during the whole of an 8300us half-cycle. It\'s even OK if the inductor
saturates, the next half-cycle will see that sorted out.

5kHz, couple of volts, half amp: 100 uH should be enough.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top