Trevor Wilson - Please read and give your view.....

[APR]

Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said about manipulation of data. Thanks

http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.AGWdataAnalysis%20v11.pdf

 

[F Murtz]

APR wrote:

Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the
article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said
about manipulation of data. Thanks

http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.AGWdataAnalysis%20v11.pdf


You have to be joking,anything that does not back Trevs

thinking is not real science and therefor wrong.

 

[Phil Allison]

"APR" I_Don't_Want@Spam.com

** Do not on usenet :

1. Post in HTML.

2. Demand a particular poster answer some mad question you dreamt up while
pissed.

3. Post a FUCKING ENORMOUS link without warning or justification.


Or - you will be seen as just another despicable pile of trolling shit
that must be kill-filed.


Ok ??



..... Phil

 

[APR]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:7h6mf7F2rs31eU1@mid.individual.net...

"APR" I_Don't_Want@Spam.com

** Do not on usenet :

1. Post in HTML.

2. Demand a particular poster answer some mad question you dreamt up
while pissed.

3. Post a FUCKING ENORMOUS link without warning or justification.


Or - you will be seen as just another despicable pile of trolling shit
that must be kill-filed.


Ok ??



.... Phil



OK Phil, my apologies.

 

[KR]

On Sep 14, 7:54 pm, F Murtz <hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote:

APR wrote:
Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the
article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said
about manipulation of data. Thanks

http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.AGWdataAnalysis%20v11.pdf

You have to be joking,anything that does not back Trevs
thinking is not real science and therefor wrong.

Agreed, you are just making more trouble, nothing will change.
Reminds me of these religious cult leaders.

 

[Trevor Wilson]

"APR" <I_Don't_Want@Spam.com> wrote in message
news:4aadefdc$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the
article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said about
manipulation of data. Thanks

http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.AGWdataAnalysis%20v11.pdf

**Idiot. Post your stupidity in the appropriate forum and I will be happy to
slap your face with your own stupidity. Try posting your cite at:
alt.global-warming . I vist that group regularly. Be prepared to back up
your own cites with some facts. I suggest you acquaint yourself with the 4th
IPCC report first.

Do not post HTML on a news group. It is extremely poor form.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[terryc]

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:54:30 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

You have to be joking,anything that does not back Trevs thinking is not
real science and therefor wrong.

Was there science in there?
Initially I thought it was someone's resume
Then I saw the list of nut cases to ignore and a couple of further pages
later decided that he was one and deleted it.

Didn't see any science
Still don't know what he is an expert in "non-climatologist".

 

[Trevor Wilson]

"APR" <I_Don't_Want@Spam.com> wrote in message
news:4aadefdc$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the
article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said about
manipulation of data. Thanks


**Still waiting for you to post your nonsense to the appropriate group. Are
you just trolling, or do you really want a rational discussion?

Your lack of response suggests that you are just an idiot troll.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[KR]

On Sep 14, 7:54 pm, F Murtz <hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote:

APR wrote:
Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the
article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said
about manipulation of data. Thanks

http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.AGWdataAnalysis%20v11.pdf

You have to be joking,anything that does not back Trevs
thinking is not real science and therefor wrong.

Maybe the resident "expert" is on holiday on the Sunshine Coast right
now ?
We just returned from up there after a couple of days of much needed
holiday,
and I think we saw his van there this afternoon, parked outside a
public toilet


http://www.geocities.com/kenreed1999/Coolum_1.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/kenreed1999/Coolum_2.jpg

Warning - image in second link may excite New Zealanders

 

[John - Melb]

On Sep 16, 8:56 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

"APR" <I_Don't_W...@Spam.com> wrote in message

news:4aadefdc$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Trevor, could you give your biased unbiased scientific critique on the
article presented in the link below. Specifically what is being said about
manipulation of data. Thanks

**Still waiting for you to post your nonsense to the appropriate group. Are
you just trolling, or do you really want a rational discussion?

Coming from a fellow who has prevously posted his anti-gun anti-
gunowner rants on groups like aus.hi-fi, rec.audio.opinion and
aus.electronics, that's funny

Your lack of response suggests that you are just an idiot troll.

Well, you're certainly the resident expert on idiot trolls.

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au