Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated p

[Magnetic]

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled
the 30-th of March.


http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

 

[Bob Eld]

"Magnetic" <magnetic.trap@yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f-47a943c9f16e@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled
the 30-th of March.


http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

Speak English!

 

[Uncle Al]

Magnetic wrote:

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.
[snip crap]]

http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/104
<http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100304/full/news.2010.108.html>
http://arxiv/abs/1003.2030

idiot


--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm

 

[Tim Wescott]

Magnetic wrote:

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled
the 30-th of March.


http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

If you are concerned about this, please refer to the following web page:
http://www.hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/

It should help clarify your status vis-a-vis whether or not you have
been reduced to fundamental particles, or even pure random energy.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com

 

[Tim Wescott]

Clay wrote:

On Mar 19, 12:42 pm, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.now> wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.
If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.
According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled
the 30-th of March.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
If you are concerned about this, please refer to the following web page:http://www.hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/

It should help clarify your status vis-a-vis whether or not you have
been reduced to fundamental particles, or even pure random energy.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consultingwww.wescottdesign.com

My philosophy is simple. If the world has ended and all is destroyed -
I won't worry about it. And if the world is not destroyed and all is
the same - I still won't worry about it.

Clay

p.s. People have worried about the production of small black holes and
that leading to the destruction of our planet. But associated with the
production of small black holes is (according to theory) is Hawking
Radiation. Now astronomers have been looking for and have so far not
found Hawking radiation. So we have a couple of choices to ponder:

1) Hawking is wrong.
2) High energy particles from space (which have much greater energies
than the LHC) fail to produce little black holes.

And the Earth seems to have been here for quite a while, so I'm not
worried about little black holes since the on slaught of hadrons has
failed to destroy us yet.

There's actually another dimension to this: According to the standard
model, black holes will not form. At those energies, black holes will
only form if one set of the myriad string theories is correct, _and_ the
little curled up dimensions in this string theory are fairly large. The
'black holes will form' is exciting because if it does it'll be an
unequivocal -- if unlikely -- proof that the string theorists really are
barking up trees in the right forest.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com

 

[Magnetic]

On Mar 19, 5:17 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:

Magnetic wrote:

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled
the 30-th of March.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm

+++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++... 6 700 000 000 000 ...
+++++++++++++++++++++++

 

[Clay]

On Mar 19, 12:42 pm, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.now> wrote:

Magnetic wrote:
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled
the 30-th of March.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

If you are concerned about this, please refer to the following web page:http://www.hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/

It should help clarify your status vis-a-vis whether or not you have
been reduced to fundamental particles, or even pure random energy.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consultingwww.wescottdesign.com

My philosophy is simple. If the world has ended and all is destroyed -
I won't worry about it. And if the world is not destroyed and all is
the same - I still won't worry about it.

Clay

p.s. People have worried about the production of small black holes and
that leading to the destruction of our planet. But associated with the
production of small black holes is (according to theory) is Hawking
Radiation. Now astronomers have been looking for and have so far not
found Hawking radiation. So we have a couple of choices to ponder:

1) Hawking is wrong.
2) High energy particles from space (which have much greater energies
than the LHC) fail to produce little black holes.

And the Earth seems to have been here for quite a while, so I'm not
worried about little black holes since the on slaught of hadrons has
failed to destroy us yet.

 

[Jens Stuckelberger]

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:43:15 -0700, Magnetic wrote:

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

I get it: You are nothing but a mindless chatbot, right?

 

[Sam Wormley]

On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote:

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

The LHC temps are many orders of magnitude below those
of the very early universe. Even cosmic rays are 6-12
orders of magnitude greater than the LHC.

 

[Wal]

In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f-
47a943c9f16e@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap@yandex.ua
says...
[...]

If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

I don't think "cosmos" is a verb.

 

[WangoTango]

In article <MPG.260d9604645d433c989682@reader80.eternal-september.org>,
Wal@somewhere.invalid says...

In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f-
47a943c9f16e@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap@yandex.ua
says...
[...]
If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

I don't think "cosmos" is a verb.

Besides, if Hawking is correct, miniature black holes are not black, and

would in fact be very hot, and very short lived, as they quantum
evaporate. The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is
still here.

 

[Nicolas Bonneel]

WangoTango wrote:

In article <MPG.260d9604645d433c989682@reader80.eternal-september.org>,
Wal@somewhere.invalid says...
In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f-
47a943c9f16e@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap@yandex.ua
says...
[...]
If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.
I don't think "cosmos" is a verb.

Besides, if Hawking is correct, miniature black holes are not black, and
would in fact be very hot, and very short lived, as they quantum
evaporate. The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is
still here.

and even during its life, the small black-hole can only absorb matter
within its Schwarzschild radius. Which is "small" for a "small" backhole.
Everything outside is attracted in the same way as if it was not a
blackhole. If the blackhole has 100 tons of matter in a very small
volume, it would not attract me more than the building next to me which
weighs much more (and which basically almost doesn't attract me at all).

 

[Michael Hosea]

"Wal" <Wal@somewhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.260d9604645d433c989682@reader80.eternal-september.org...

In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f-
47a943c9f16e@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap@yandex.ua
says...
[...]
If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.

I don't think "cosmos" is a verb.

Maybe it's a new dance.

 

[WangoTango]

In article <ho0mvr$jgq$1@swain.cs.ubc.ca>, nbonneel@cs.ubc.ca says...

WangoTango wrote:
In article <MPG.260d9604645d433c989682@reader80.eternal-september.org>,
Wal@somewhere.invalid says...
In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f-
47a943c9f16e@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap@yandex.ua
says...
[...]
If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all
people will start to cosmos.
I don't think "cosmos" is a verb.

Besides, if Hawking is correct, miniature black holes are not black, and
would in fact be very hot, and very short lived, as they quantum
evaporate. The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is
still here.

and even during its life, the small black-hole can only absorb matter
within its Schwarzschild radius. Which is "small" for a "small" backhole.
Everything outside is attracted in the same way as if it was not a
blackhole. If the blackhole has 100 tons of matter in a very small
volume, it would not attract me more than the building next to me which
weighs much more (and which basically almost doesn't attract me at all).

So, you don't like the architecture, or what?

Maybe a little paint.......

 

[Sjouke Burry]

Sam Wormley wrote:

On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.



The LHC temps are many orders of magnitude below those
of the very early universe. Even cosmic rays are 6-12
orders of magnitude greater than the LHC.

About a hundred people have tried to confuse M with facts.

It does not work.
He is like a maniak blind to all arguments and info.

 

[Sam Wormley]

On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote:

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

At 5:20 a.m., local time, in Geneva, Switzerland, physicists sent two
proton beams racing around the Large Hadron Collider's oval-shaped,
17-mile-long (27-kilometer-long) underground tunnel.

Each beam packed a powerful 3.5-trillion-electron-volt (TeV) punch—the
highest energy yet achieved in a particle accelerator, or atom smasher.
(Learn more about atom smashers.)

The Large Hadron Collider had also set the previous record. Last
December the LHC smashed two 1.18-TeV beams to create a 2.36-TeV collision.

 

[Magnetic]

On Mar 20, 2:12 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:

On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote:

Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to
the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect
but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental
collisions of protons.

At 5:20 a.m., local time, in Geneva, Switzerland, physicists sent two
proton beams racing around the Large Hadron Collider's oval-shaped,
17-mile-long (27-kilometer-long) underground tunnel.

Each beam packed a powerful 3.5-trillion-electron-volt (TeV) punch—the
highest energy yet achieved in a particle accelerator, or atom smasher.
(Learn more about atom smashers.)

The Large Hadron Collider had also set the previous record. Last
December the LHC smashed two 1.18-TeV beams to create a 2.36-TeV collision

Today morning they repeated yesturdays achivement.
But thre were no collisions yet.

The death is soon.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html


-----------
Proton, p = (uud).
Neutron, n = (udd).
Lambda, l = (uds).
Antiproton, p~ = (u~u~d~).
Antineutron, n~ = (u~d~d~).
Antilambda, l~ = (u~d~s~).
Hypertriton, T = (pnl).
Antihypertriton, T~ = (p~n~l~).

RHIC collides ions. That creates HOT quark gluon plasma.
Now LHC collides protons. In non-central inelastic collisions it can
tear out of a Dirac sea a COLD crystals of strange matter and
antimatter:

p + p = p + p + N(uds) + N(u~d~s~).

N is a number of lambda and antilambda in "strange nucleus or
antinucleus".
The number of nucleons in usual matter is limited, because of electric
repulsion between protons. The periodic system is limited by uranium.
The number of lambda (strange nucleons) in strange matter can be not
limited and it is possible that neutron stars are in fact are big
strange nuclei.

The strange matter can transform a usual matter into strange matter
because under big N the binding energy per nucleon in strange nucleus
is bigger than in usual matter under the same number of nucleons.

The binding energy can be find through the mass differences of
nucleons in free state and inside the nucleus.

Usual matter:

Mass of a free proton is 938.272 MeV/c^2.
Mass of a proton in deuteron is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in He is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in C is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in Fe is several MeV/c^2 less, and minimal.

These mass differences say us about binding energy.

Strange droplet consisting of a several (uds) is unstable and decay.

The mass of free lambda is 1116 MeV/c^2 and is almost 200 MeV/c^2
bigger than the mass of free proton or free neutron.
This is the cause of lambda decay.
Some authors said that strange nucleus, consisting of 10 lambdas, can
be stable.
The binding energy of one lambda in big strange nucleus can be, for
example, of about 500 MeV/c^2.
That means that strange nucleus can grow transforming usual nuclei
into strange ones.
The value 500 TeV, as a binding energy of (uds) in a strangelet
N(uds), can easily be received from comparison with the rest energy of
kaons K+ and K0, which are correspondingly 493 MeV and 497 MeV.
Kaons (K+=us~; K0=ds~) can be side products, occurring at the time of
proton (p=uud) and neutron (n=udd) capture by strange matter N(uds):
N(uds) + p = (N+1)(uds) + K+ = (N+1)(uds) + e+ + 500 MeV.
(N+1)(uds) + n = (N+2)(uds) + K0 = (N+2)(uds) + 500 MeV.
....
....
....
Extremely powerful explosion.

This explosion has specific energy output, which is hundred times
bigger than under the nuclear explosion.

By the way, at the time of November-December collisions there were
more Kaons output that it was theoretically predicted. That means that
we are very close to creation of this dead droplet, which can
transform the whole Earth into 10-meterr lump of strange\dead matter.
Space observations says us that periods of pulsars are almost do not
change. That means that strange matter is very stable.

Read about strange matter, strangelets, and strange stars in
Wikipedia. I think that our civilization is crazy. From one hand, it
already knows about a deadly dangerous strange matter; from the other
hand, it tries to create that dead droplet at colliders. I do not
understand you, people. I wish you to become mentally healthy and STOP
all powerful colliders.

As we can see, they can do at RHIC a strangelet (uds) and
antistrangelet (u~d~s~) but yet N=1.

The cause is ion collision, 200 GeV, per nucleon, leading to HOT quark
gluon plasma.
At LHC there will be proton collision, 3500 GeV per proton. At LHC two
COLD crystals can be created from Dirac’s quark sea. That is
absolutely different state. That is not hot quark gluon plasma, but
cold crystals, torn out of Dirac’s quark sea. Density of those
crystals can be hundred times bigger than the density of nuclear
matter and by hundred millions times more than the density of usual
solid matter.

Strange crystal, which can be made tomorrow at LHC, will kill us all.
p + p + 2*3.5 TeV= 6000(usd) + 6000(u~s~d~)

Strange crystal 6000(usd) is extremely stable and deadly dangerous!
This is a droplet of strange matter, embryo of a "neutron star". The
whole Earth can be transformed into such strange matter in a 1000 of
seconds or slightly more.

-----
Reaction p + p = p + p + N(uds) + N(u~d~s~) can also occur in the
collision of two cosmic protons or in a collision of cosmic and
atmospheric proton.
"Cosmo-cosmo" crystal’s creation in Solar system is very rarefied even
at the cosmology times. But they are not dangerous, because they can
be blown out of a Solar system by light of a Sun.
"Cosmo-atmospheric" crystals would have huge velocities in the Earth
atmosphere. As a result the particles of atmosphere would have TeV
energies in the reference systems of these crystals. These energies
are thousands times bigger than the specific binding energy of lambdas
in crystals. That will lead to destruction of "Cosmo-atmospheric"
crystals.

 

[John]

My philosophy is simple. If the world has ended and all is destroyed -
I won't worry about it. And if the world is not destroyed and all is
the same - I still won't worry about it.

If the world is not destroyed and all is the same, it doesn't mean that you
don't have a reason to be worried...Unless you just don't care about
anything
going on around you?

What if you can prove that the experiments conducted at CERN can
destroy the world? Will you worry about it then??

PS: I'm not saying that the people who are against the CERN experiments
are right, but I applaud that they care...

 

[Baron]

Sjouke Burry Inscribed thus:

Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons
to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions,
probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not
intersect but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were
accidental collisions of protons.



The LHC temps are many orders of magnitude below those
of the very early universe. Even cosmic rays are 6-12
orders of magnitude greater than the LHC.

About a hundred people have tried to confuse M with facts.
It does not work.
He is like a maniak blind to all arguments and info.

He's a prat !

--
Best Regards:
Baron.

 

[Sam Wormley]

On 3/20/10 4:52 AM, Magnetic wrote:

Today morning they repeated yesturdays achivement.
But thre were no collisions yet.

The death is soon.

The LHC has smashed the energy record--Now to the future

"CERN says it will soon announce a timeline for converging the 3.5-TeV
beams, which together will yield another record: a collision at 7 TeV.
That will be the LHC's peak collision energy for 18–24 months before the
collider shuts down in 2012 for a year of hardware repairs; only after
that will CERN fire up the LHC at its design energy of 7 TeV per beam,
producing 14-TeV collisions. But given how much physicists have learned
from the much weaker Tevatron, even a half-strength LHC may have a
chance to open up new realms of physics".
Ref:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=lhc-surpasses-its-own-record-as-the-2010-03-19