The United States should not have overreacted to or use the unintended entry of the Chinese civilian unmanned airship for political manipula...

A

a a

Guest
\"The United States should not have overreacted to or use the unintended entry of the Chinese civilian unmanned airship for political manipulation to smear and attack China: spokesperson http://xhtxs.cn/ENp
 
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:07:45 PM UTC-6, a a wrote:
> \"The United States should not have overreacted to or use the unintended entry of the Chinese civilian unmanned airship for political manipulation to smear and attack China: spokesperson http://xhtxs.cn/ENp

They should have consulted the headless time traveler who would have foreseen all outcomes

https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney-powell-voter-fraud-claims-headless-time-travel-dominion-fox-2023-2
 
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:07:45 PM UTC-5, a a wrote:
> \"The United States should not have overreacted to or use the unintended entry of the Chinese civilian unmanned airship for political manipulation to smear and attack China: spokesperson http://xhtxs.cn/ENp

China should put some kind of device on their stupid balloons to abort the mission when it looks like they\'re heading into U.S. air space.
 
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:52:28 PM UTC-8, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:07:45 PM UTC-5, a a wrote:
\"The United States should not have overreacted to or use the unintended entry of the Chinese civilian unmanned airship for political manipulation to smear and attack China: spokesperson http://xhtxs.cn/ENp
China should put some kind of device on their stupid balloons to abort the mission when it looks like they\'re heading into U.S. air space.

Why bother, when the US is spending a few millions to abort the mission for them. Missiles are expensive. I wonder why the AF can\'t use machine guns or something to punch some holes and slowly deflate it.
 
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 6:30:39 PM UTC-5, Ed Lee wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:52:28 PM UTC-8, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:07:45 PM UTC-5, a a wrote:
\"The United States should not have overreacted to or use the unintended entry of the Chinese civilian unmanned airship for political manipulation to smear and attack China: spokesperson http://xhtxs.cn/ENp
China should put some kind of device on their stupid balloons to abort the mission when it looks like they\'re heading into U.S. air space.
Why bother, when the US is spending a few millions to abort the mission for them. Missiles are expensive. I wonder why the AF can\'t use machine guns or something to punch some holes and slowly deflate it.

\"Massie noted an example from 1998, in which Canadian F-18s shot at a wayward 100 meter weather balloon, which after being hit by 1,000 rounds managed to stay airborne for another six days.\"

According to a 2009 research paper on stratospheric airships by Kevin Massie, a major in the U.S. Air Force, despite their large size they are \"difficult to detect and if hit, do not immediately descend.\"

https://www.newsweek.com/chinese-spy-balloon-hard-shoot-down-crash-landing-1778839
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top