Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarter (I was
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just... confusing) you see
George doing a headstand...
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 5:47:05â¯PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarter (I was
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just... confusing) you see
George doing a headstand...
If the outer heads up George starts out a the 12 o\' clock on the inner quarter, by the time it rolls around to the 6 o\'clock, the outer George is back to its original orientation. So that\'s already one revolution at the halfway point.
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:24:54â¯PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 5:47:05â¯PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarter (I was
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just... confusing) you see
George doing a headstand...
If the outer heads up George starts out a the 12 o\' clock on the inner quarter, by the time it rolls around to the 6 o\'clock, the outer George is back to its original orientation. So that\'s already one revolution at the halfway point.
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarterOn Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 4:15:56â¯AM UTC-4, Ricky wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:24:54â¯PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 5:47:05â¯PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs
wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to
make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just...
confusing) you see George doing a headstand...
If the outer heads up George starts out a the 12 o\' clock on the
inner quarter, by the time it rolls around to the 6 o\'clock, the
outer George is back to its original orientation. So that\'s
already one revolution at the halfway point.
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again,
it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one
circumference, which is just one revolution? If you can\'t express
yourself using standard terminology, don\'t bother.
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 4:15:56â¯AM UTC-4, Ricky wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:24:54â¯PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 5:47:05â¯PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarter (I was
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just... confusing) you see
George doing a headstand...
If the outer heads up George starts out a the 12 o\' clock on the inner quarter, by the time it rolls around to the 6 o\'clock, the outer George is back to its original orientation. So that\'s already one revolution at the halfway point.
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference, which is just one revolution? If you can\'t express yourself using standard terminology, don\'t bother.
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference, which is just one revolution?
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 8:05:25â¯AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 4:15:56â¯AM UTC-4, Ricky wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:24:54â¯PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 5:47:05â¯PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarter (I was
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just... confusing) you see
George doing a headstand...
If the outer heads up George starts out a the 12 o\' clock on the inner quarter, by the time it rolls around to the 6 o\'clock, the outer George is back to its original orientation. So that\'s already one revolution at the halfway point.
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference, which is just one revolution? If you can\'t express yourself using standard terminology, don\'t bother.
I\'d like to know what is wrong with you. The coin rolls a distance equal to its circumference, so that\'s one turn. It also travels around the other coin, so that\'s another turn. 1 + 1 = 2
Is that \"standard\" enough for you?
--
Rick C.
+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On June 22, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference, which is just one revolution?
How many times does it rotate, seen from the center
of the stationary coin?
\"It\'s all relative\"... somebody once said ...
--
Rich
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one
circumference, which is just one revolution? If you can\'t express
yourself using standard terminology, don\'t bother.
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 3:14:35â¯PM UTC-4, Ricky wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 8:05:25â¯AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 4:15:56â¯AM UTC-4, Ricky wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:24:54â¯PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 5:47:05â¯PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:43:13â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
\"Coins, testing errors and planetary motionâitâs enough to make anyoneâs head spin.\"
Not exactly an aha moment here...needs a better explanation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sat-problem-that-everybody-got-wrong/
Well, if you consider the first quadrant of the rotation of the quarter (I was
about to say the first quarter rotation, but that\'s just... confusing) you see
George doing a headstand...
If the outer heads up George starts out a the 12 o\' clock on the inner quarter, by the time it rolls around to the 6 o\'clock, the outer George is back to its original orientation. So that\'s already one revolution at the halfway point.
Yeah, where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference, which is just one revolution? If you can\'t express yourself using standard terminology, don\'t bother.
I\'d like to know what is wrong with you. The coin rolls a distance equal to its circumference, so that\'s one turn. It also travels around the other coin, so that\'s another turn. 1 + 1 = 2
Is that \"standard\" enough for you?
Standard word salad.
where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference,
which is just one revolution?
How many times does it rotate, seen from the center of the stationary coin?
From the perspective of a human eye watching the process and fixated on the moving coin,
On June 23, Fred Bloggs wrote:
where\'s the problem? When moving coin reaches the top again, it has rotated twice.
Care to explain how it does that by rolling a distance of one circumference,
which is just one revolution?
How many times does it rotate, seen from the center of the stationary coin?
From the perspective of a human eye watching the process and fixated on the moving coin,
Where is this human eye?
and what is usually considered a revolution...
How many times does the moon rotate, in one month,
viewed from the earth?
--
Rich