Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are saintly like me
enlightening us.If you are saintly like me then the public record is your friend.
On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
record is your enemy.
Bret Cahill
You're so right. Who could doubt any of what you say? Thanks for
Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4bbbd49c-633e-46b7-adb6-c506d1fa22b7@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If you are saintly like me then the public record is your friend.
On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
record is your enemy.
Bret Cahill
You're so right. Who could doubt any of what you say? Thanks for
enlightening us.
I don't need peer reviewers; I have customers.Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
crime . . .
Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
any,
You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
puppets. Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
a small child.
It never occurred to me.But if you actually send something to a tech magazine, for God's sake,
don't mention _my_ name.
You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sockYeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
any,
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent bybut we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
"In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
record is your enemy.
You're so right. �Who could doubt any of what you say? �Thanks for
enlightening us.
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent bybut we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
Almost all who are active in industry will eventually end upJust as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
crime . . .
Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
any,
You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
puppets. ďż˝ Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
a small child.
I don't need peer reviewers;
Let me guess. There's no paper trail whatsoever.I have customers.
Why? Writing code and manuals is plenty enough work.but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent by
anyone.
Like I said, if you are delusional, the record ain't yer friend.
..........
Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
crime . . .
Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
any,
You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
puppets. ? Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
a small child.
I don't need peer reviewers;
Almost all who are active in industry will eventually end up
publishing _something_ as a byproduct of their work.
Checks are made of very nice paper.I have customers.
Let me guess. There's no paper trail whatsoever.
Again, why? It takes a lot of time and energy to get patents, andNothing in the public record either.
No patents, no nothing.
"In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
The sock puppeteer(s?) might make some money in the entirely reputable"In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
�In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
Michael,
I'm not speaking for Bret here, since he makes his own dicisions about what he writes, and what he chooses to read,
but it seems to me that this sort of plain insulting posts does not add anything positive to this NG.
So kind request : please refrain from remarks like this.
---"In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
?In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
But there's no just money in trying to fake a background in tech . . .
Now now now. It's not my fault you made yourself look like an idiot.Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
---Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
Now now now. It's not my fault you made yourself look like an idiot.
Every time you try to cut snip something you have difficulty
accepting, I'll just reinsert it:
---"You are vexed therefore I am right about you."
-- Nietzsche
---John, Bret,
You both posted many of this sort of threads between the two of you here on sci.energy.
I hope you understand that you are feeding each other with personal attacks and both of you show no sign of letting go of previous
accusations, ad nauseam.
Overall, these threads are not so interesting for the rest of the NG readers.
So can one of the two of you be the wisest and stop replying to the 'group' when the other posts something, ragardless of how much
you think the other is wrong ?
Post directly to the sender, or even better, don't post anything unless you are making a scientific/technical comment about the
subject.
Not sure if it either one of you is wise enough to do so, but it should reduce the amount of senseless postings here in sci.energy.
On s.e.b.,it's not "entertainment" - it's merely annoying, and could beI don't like to flame via email because then there's no audience to
view the "entertainment"
---On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0500, John Fields wrote:
I don't like to flame via email because then there's no audience to
view the "entertainment"
On s.e.b.,it's not "entertainment" - it's merely annoying, and could be
off-putting to the beginners.
---If you can't contribute anything constructive, at least pretend you have
the class to not be an asshole.
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:13:17 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0500, John Fields wrote:
I don't like to flame via email because then there's no audience to
view the "entertainment"
On s.e.b.,it's not "entertainment" - it's merely annoying, and could be
off-putting to the beginners.
---
In what way?
If they have questions to ask they should ask them and hope for the
best, regardless of the bombshells dropping around them which, BTW,
have nothing to do with them.
You seem to think that seb is a pristine site of enlightenment.
Take a look at it lately.
It's been invaded by liars and cheats who have no interest in
electronics, but are intent on spreading lies and furthering their own
agendas.
---
If you can't contribute anything constructive, at least pretend you have
the class to not be an asshole.
---
Geez, In addition to fighting the liars, I think I just helped a guy
out with a sample-and-infinite-hold problem, your assholiness.
And you?
Or any of the rest of the personas in your kennel?
(snip)There's no money in faking an interest in tech in order to flame 24/7
so the only conclusion is anyone posting here without a tech
background, formal or informal, academic or industrial, is irrational
_per se_.
Because of the spectacular breakthroughs in microelectronics, we'reI don't like to flame via email because then there's no audience to
view the "entertainment"
On s.e.b.,it's not "entertainment" - it's merely annoying, and could be
off-putting to the beginners.
Just because the non functionals aren't interested in tech doesn'tIf you can't contribute anything constructive,
There's a reason they are in fantasy land and apparently it needs toat least pretend you have
the class to not be an asshole.