B
bkh99
Guest
The two Pioneer spacecraft which were launched in the early
seventies,
have both been decelerating at a constant speed as they rise in the
sun's gravitational field (the rate of constant deceleration is
equivalent to the speed of light multiplied by Hubble's Constant).
It
is obvious that such a correspondance could not be attributed to
random
causes, such as gas leaks, but rather new physics are required.
The behavior of objects that fall or rise in gravitational fields are
inversely related, in that a falling object begins slow and then
accelerates, while a rising object begins fast and then decelerates.
An example of the latter is the release of a weather balloon which
attempts to rise at full velocity but is prevented from doing so by
atmospheric drag. The weather balloon then decelerates at is rises
in
the gravitational field until finally it stops and then parks in an
orbital state at a certain height. This behavior is similar to that
exhibited by the Pioneer craft.
Think of the total potential velocity of the Pioneer Spacecraft as
being somewhere just below the speed of light. When an object is
'conserving momentum' as it rises in a gravitational field and the
result is deceleration and a loss of velocity, this means that the
object would require 'more momentum' if it was to maintain its
previous
velocity. When an object which is rising in a gravitational field
and
is 'conserving momentum' and it decelerates and then loses velocity
what this implies is that at the same time its total potential
velocity
is increasing. Here we can see the reason for the relationship
between
Hubble's Constant (used to measure redshift) and the rate of
deceleration of an object rising in a gravitational field. Einstein
was incorrect to insist that speed of light is a fixed constant in
all
frames of reference (any space-time) but it must be the case that the
speed of light is relative (space dilation, time dilation, and
velocity
dilation all occur in harmoney). It is this error that prevented
Einstein from successfully discovering the Unified Field Theory which
would unify gravity and electromagnetism during his lifetime.
The solution to this enigma of 'conserved momentum' resulting in
'deceleration' is to understand that everything is relative, and that
includes 'momentum' since one given 'momentum' results in a lower or
a
higher velocity in different frames (with no exchange of energy
taking
place an object will acelerate and fall or decelerate and rise).
The explanation for this behavior is found in a proper
electromagnetic
explanation of Archimedes principle. The universe is a giant energy
field and what we call 'space' is a three dimensional creation of the
magnetic field (which is a three dimensional pheonomenon). 'Space'
dilates according to the Inverse Square Law (the energy field is more
dense closer to a source and then becomes less and less dense the
further away you move from the source). Given these inherent density
restrictions you can only put so much 'energy' into 'so much space'
and
where this restriction is violated displacement occurs. It is this
tight binding that exists between 'energy' and 'space' which then
results in 'motion' and 'velocity'.
Another mistake that Einstein made was to dilate space (stretch it
out)
closer to the field source. This dilation was required if there was
to
be a slower clock in a gravitational field while at the same time the
speed of light was to be kept an invariant constant. It is only when
we dilate space-energy (make it less dense) the further we move from
the source and allow the speed of light to be a variable constant
(relative) that we are then able to discover the unified field theory
(unifying gravitation and electromagnetism). Motion is simply
displacement (an unallowable energy state) and what we think of as
momentum is merely a density function (the greater the density of the
energy in a closed energy system, the more forceful the displacement,
the greater the velocity).
Think of a weather balloon. It expands at it rises. It also
decelerates and eventually parks and maintains an oribt. What this
tells us is that even though no energy transfer is taking place, the
weather balloon is not 'conserving its momentum', but rather it must
be
losing momentum because it decelerates as it rises in the
gravitational
field. We also see that the weather balloon experiences the effects
of
dilation in that it expands. We also know that 'hot gas' expands,
which is also a density function, and that hot gas then rises in the
gravitational field (it is to dense, it is displaced, it rises). Now
as an object rises it experiences a relative loss of momentum
(relative
in that this loss of momentum occurs without an actual transfer of
energy taking place). This occurs because of relativistic spatial
dilation which becomes greater the further you move away from the
center of the field. This dilation then results in a lower density
since the amount of energy now contained in an expanding space is
lower. The displacement decreases and the result is less momentum
and
deceleration.
In a similar way when an electromagnetic wave rises in a
gravitational
field it red-shifts. It does not red-shift because it is 'losing
energy' to the gravitational field. This was another one of the
compounding errors made by Albert Einstein (the result of keeping the
speed of light a fixed constant). The light red-shifts because it is
following the requirements of the Inverse Square Law. It is becoming
'less energetic' so that it has a lower frequency and a longer
wavelength. At the same time the law of the conservation of energy
requires that energy never be lost or created, it can only be
transferred. In this case the energy is 'transfered' to 'momentum'
and
teh speed of light increases as it red-shifts. There is nothing
mystical or magical about this process, it is just the logically
following consequence of the light being forced to dilate as it moves
into less dense regions of the energy field.
Even though the speed of light is a variable constant, it makes no
difference, for the average speed of light between two points always
works out to be 300,000 kilometers per second, so no one notices the
variance. Think of it this way. Let's assume that the speed of
light
was '10'. The speed of light as it bounces off some satellite in
space
is 5, 10, 15 as it rises and then it is 15, 10, 5 as it descends back
to earth, for an average speed of '10', Therefore even though the
speed of light is relative, the light from an object '4 light years'
away from earth would still seem to take '4 years' to reach us, and
so
no difference is ever noticed by any observer in any frame of
reference
you might want to choose.
More discussion of this issue can be found at the following URL.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/index.html
Or as an 'e-book' in the form of a zip file.
http://www.awitness.org/unified.zip
Some satirical discussion of 'lighter than air balloons' and
Einstein's
matter based theory of gravity can be found here.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/tautology.html
A proposed experiment to test the predictions of the Unified Field
Theory can be found on the following page.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/pioneer_experiment.html
seventies,
have both been decelerating at a constant speed as they rise in the
sun's gravitational field (the rate of constant deceleration is
equivalent to the speed of light multiplied by Hubble's Constant).
It
is obvious that such a correspondance could not be attributed to
random
causes, such as gas leaks, but rather new physics are required.
The behavior of objects that fall or rise in gravitational fields are
inversely related, in that a falling object begins slow and then
accelerates, while a rising object begins fast and then decelerates.
An example of the latter is the release of a weather balloon which
attempts to rise at full velocity but is prevented from doing so by
atmospheric drag. The weather balloon then decelerates at is rises
in
the gravitational field until finally it stops and then parks in an
orbital state at a certain height. This behavior is similar to that
exhibited by the Pioneer craft.
Think of the total potential velocity of the Pioneer Spacecraft as
being somewhere just below the speed of light. When an object is
'conserving momentum' as it rises in a gravitational field and the
result is deceleration and a loss of velocity, this means that the
object would require 'more momentum' if it was to maintain its
previous
velocity. When an object which is rising in a gravitational field
and
is 'conserving momentum' and it decelerates and then loses velocity
what this implies is that at the same time its total potential
velocity
is increasing. Here we can see the reason for the relationship
between
Hubble's Constant (used to measure redshift) and the rate of
deceleration of an object rising in a gravitational field. Einstein
was incorrect to insist that speed of light is a fixed constant in
all
frames of reference (any space-time) but it must be the case that the
speed of light is relative (space dilation, time dilation, and
velocity
dilation all occur in harmoney). It is this error that prevented
Einstein from successfully discovering the Unified Field Theory which
would unify gravity and electromagnetism during his lifetime.
The solution to this enigma of 'conserved momentum' resulting in
'deceleration' is to understand that everything is relative, and that
includes 'momentum' since one given 'momentum' results in a lower or
a
higher velocity in different frames (with no exchange of energy
taking
place an object will acelerate and fall or decelerate and rise).
The explanation for this behavior is found in a proper
electromagnetic
explanation of Archimedes principle. The universe is a giant energy
field and what we call 'space' is a three dimensional creation of the
magnetic field (which is a three dimensional pheonomenon). 'Space'
dilates according to the Inverse Square Law (the energy field is more
dense closer to a source and then becomes less and less dense the
further away you move from the source). Given these inherent density
restrictions you can only put so much 'energy' into 'so much space'
and
where this restriction is violated displacement occurs. It is this
tight binding that exists between 'energy' and 'space' which then
results in 'motion' and 'velocity'.
Another mistake that Einstein made was to dilate space (stretch it
out)
closer to the field source. This dilation was required if there was
to
be a slower clock in a gravitational field while at the same time the
speed of light was to be kept an invariant constant. It is only when
we dilate space-energy (make it less dense) the further we move from
the source and allow the speed of light to be a variable constant
(relative) that we are then able to discover the unified field theory
(unifying gravitation and electromagnetism). Motion is simply
displacement (an unallowable energy state) and what we think of as
momentum is merely a density function (the greater the density of the
energy in a closed energy system, the more forceful the displacement,
the greater the velocity).
Think of a weather balloon. It expands at it rises. It also
decelerates and eventually parks and maintains an oribt. What this
tells us is that even though no energy transfer is taking place, the
weather balloon is not 'conserving its momentum', but rather it must
be
losing momentum because it decelerates as it rises in the
gravitational
field. We also see that the weather balloon experiences the effects
of
dilation in that it expands. We also know that 'hot gas' expands,
which is also a density function, and that hot gas then rises in the
gravitational field (it is to dense, it is displaced, it rises). Now
as an object rises it experiences a relative loss of momentum
(relative
in that this loss of momentum occurs without an actual transfer of
energy taking place). This occurs because of relativistic spatial
dilation which becomes greater the further you move away from the
center of the field. This dilation then results in a lower density
since the amount of energy now contained in an expanding space is
lower. The displacement decreases and the result is less momentum
and
deceleration.
In a similar way when an electromagnetic wave rises in a
gravitational
field it red-shifts. It does not red-shift because it is 'losing
energy' to the gravitational field. This was another one of the
compounding errors made by Albert Einstein (the result of keeping the
speed of light a fixed constant). The light red-shifts because it is
following the requirements of the Inverse Square Law. It is becoming
'less energetic' so that it has a lower frequency and a longer
wavelength. At the same time the law of the conservation of energy
requires that energy never be lost or created, it can only be
transferred. In this case the energy is 'transfered' to 'momentum'
and
teh speed of light increases as it red-shifts. There is nothing
mystical or magical about this process, it is just the logically
following consequence of the light being forced to dilate as it moves
into less dense regions of the energy field.
Even though the speed of light is a variable constant, it makes no
difference, for the average speed of light between two points always
works out to be 300,000 kilometers per second, so no one notices the
variance. Think of it this way. Let's assume that the speed of
light
was '10'. The speed of light as it bounces off some satellite in
space
is 5, 10, 15 as it rises and then it is 15, 10, 5 as it descends back
to earth, for an average speed of '10', Therefore even though the
speed of light is relative, the light from an object '4 light years'
away from earth would still seem to take '4 years' to reach us, and
so
no difference is ever noticed by any observer in any frame of
reference
you might want to choose.
More discussion of this issue can be found at the following URL.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/index.html
Or as an 'e-book' in the form of a zip file.
http://www.awitness.org/unified.zip
Some satirical discussion of 'lighter than air balloons' and
Einstein's
matter based theory of gravity can be found here.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/tautology.html
A proposed experiment to test the predictions of the Unified Field
Theory can be found on the following page.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/pioneer_experiment.html