The non-existing variant of NCP730...

P

Piotr Wyderski

Guest
The datasheet says that the \"B\" version has power good indicator and
that the part is available both in TSOP-5 and WDFN. Both drawings show
where the PG pin is supposed to be. But only the \"A\" version in TSOP-5
is available on the market. What is the purpose of specifying the part
in such a misleading way?

Best regards, Piotr
 
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 09:15:59 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<peter.pan@neverland.mil> wrote:

The datasheet says that the \"B\" version has power good indicator and
that the part is available both in TSOP-5 and WDFN. Both drawings show
where the PG pin is supposed to be. But only the \"A\" version in TSOP-5
is available on the market. What is the purpose of specifying the part
in such a misleading way?

Best regards, Piotr

Fishing for big sales. We do that too sometimes, mention an option or
a feature that we could do, to see if anyone is interested. It\'s not
misleading; it says to contact your rep.

It\'s probably just a wirebond option.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Fishing for big sales. We do that too sometimes, mention an option or
a feature that we could do, to see if anyone is interested. It\'s not
misleading; it says to contact your rep.

It\'s probably just a wirebond option.

I agree with the above, but then why not just connect the PG pad to a
pin which is otherwise NC in the \"A\" variant and have one uniform part?
The \"B\" would significantly simplify me a section of a circuit, but the
minor issue is that it does not exist in TSOP-5.

Best regards, Piotr
 
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 at 1:51:44 PM UTC-4, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Fishing for big sales. We do that too sometimes, mention an option or
a feature that we could do, to see if anyone is interested. It\'s not
misleading; it says to contact your rep.

It\'s probably just a wirebond option.

I agree with the above, but then why not just connect the PG pad to a
pin which is otherwise NC in the \"A\" variant and have one uniform part?
The \"B\" would significantly simplify me a section of a circuit, but the
minor issue is that it does not exist in TSOP-5.

Best regards, Piotr

Why are you asking us instead of the company rep? Maybe they have plans to produce the other package variant but just need a bit more incentive?

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top