the lie of rapid NiMH self-discharge

  • Thread starter William Sommerwerck
  • Start date
W

William Sommerwerck

Guest
I've never had problems with the supposed rapid self-discharge of NiMH
cells. And now I have proof.

Almost two years ago, I visited a friend in Gold Bar WA for Christmas. I
took some camera equipment, including freshly charged NiMH cells for the
flash. I didn't take any flash pictures, so the cells remained unused in the
camera case -- which I just got around to unpacking yesterday. (Really.)

Four of the cells were 2700mAh Sanyo AAs. They all measured about 1.23V,
rather lower than the 1.4V NiMH cells commonly charge up to, but close to
the "nominal" 1.25V of NiMH and nicad cells. Contrary to Urban Legend, they
were not completely discharged.

I put them in a Canon 580EX II, and the flash fully charged up in less than
two seconds. I fired off some shots. The first few recycled "instantly". The
last two took about a half a second. I didn't run down the cells, but it was
obvious that two years of sitting on the shelf had no rendered them
unusable.

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey. Where
it came from, I don't know.

--
"We already know the answers -- we just haven't asked the right
questions." -- Edwin Land
 
"spamtrap1888" <spamtrap1888@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52a89893-486e-4517-9b48-79dd505e07e0@f36g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 4:26 am, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net>
wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where
it came from, I don't know.

My phone, my wife's phone, my Dremel nail grinder, and the eight Sony
AAs I bought before I knew about NiMHs, for a starter. These all are
replacements for or successors to products with NiCads, which by
comparison held a charge until needed.
Click to expand...
Then why can four NiMH cells sit for two years and still be able to properly
power a high-drain device?
 
On Dec 12, 4:26 am, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net>
wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey. Where
it came from, I don't know.
Click to expand...
My phone, my wife's phone, my Dremel nail grinder, and the eight Sony
AAs I bought before I knew about NiMHs, for a starter. These all are
replacements for or successors to products with NiCads, which by
comparison held a charge until needed.
 
In article <jc57nd$dlp$1@dont-email.me>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where it came from, I don't know.
Click to expand...
You seem to be drawing a sweeping conclusion based on one data point.
Not always a reliable approach?

Then why can four NiMH cells sit for two years and still be able to properly
power a high-drain device?
Click to expand...
Likely possibility: the NiMH cells that you installed two years ago
use an internel chemistry which is superior to that used in
early-generation NiMH cells.

I definitely did observe the "rapid self-discharge" problem in the
first lots of NiMH cells I purchased and used, some years ago. They
simply were not reliable for storage times of more than 2-3 months...
they'd be down to less than half of their rated capacity after that
time.

Newer ones are much better. The ones advertised as "low self
discharge rate" (e.g Immedions, Eneloops, and the like) have been
available for several years, and I believe that the improved
low-self-discharge technologies have begun appearing in more
"mainstream" NiMH cells which aren't specifically advertised in this
way.

As I understand it, there's a tradeoff in NiMH cell chemistry:
capacity vs. self-discharge. Different metal alloys and structures
materials have different hydrogen-bonding characteristics... put
crudely, a tightly-binding structure will hold less total hydrogen
(i.e. less total charge storage capacity) but self-discharges at a
lower rate and thus holds its capacity for a longer time. Cells with
higher storage capacity use an alloy/structure which packs in more
hydrogen, but doesn't bind it as strongly and thus tends to
self-discharge more easily. [Again, this is a crude explanation based
on my own in-expert knowledge of the chemistry]

In good-quality NiMH AA cells currently on the market, cells down in
the 2000-2100 mAh range seem to be representative of the "lower
self-discharge rate" variety, and have a useful standby lifetime not
terribly different from NiCd cells. NiMH cells up in the 2400-2500 mAh
range seem to suffer more self-discharge. At least, that's my own
experience over the past year or two.

So, my guess is that the batteries you bought two years ago, were ones
at the lower-self-discharge end of the design range (even if not
explicitly advertised as such).

--
Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org> AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
 
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
I've never had problems with the supposed rapid self-discharge of NiMH
cells. And now I have proof.

Almost two years ago, I visited a friend in Gold Bar WA for Christmas. I
took some camera equipment, including freshly charged NiMH cells for the
flash. I didn't take any flash pictures, so the cells remained unused in the
camera case -- which I just got around to unpacking yesterday. (Really.)

Four of the cells were 2700mAh Sanyo AAs. They all measured about 1.23V,
rather lower than the 1.4V NiMH cells commonly charge up to, but close to
the "nominal" 1.25V of NiMH and nicad cells. Contrary to Urban Legend, they
were not completely discharged.

I put them in a Canon 580EX II, and the flash fully charged up in less than
two seconds. I fired off some shots. The first few recycled "instantly". The
last two took about a half a second. I didn't run down the cells, but it was
obvious that two years of sitting on the shelf had no rendered them
unusable.

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey. Where
it came from, I don't know.
Click to expand...
so you got dead battery performance and maybe 3 flashes and therefor
batteries don't self discharge?
 
"Cydrome Leader" <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote in message
news:jc5bal$9ic$2@reader1.panix.com...
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

I've never had problems with the supposed rapid self-discharge of NiMH
cells. And now I have proof.

Almost two years ago, I visited a friend in Gold Bar WA for Christmas. I
took some camera equipment, including freshly charged NiMH cells for the
flash. I didn't take any flash pictures, so the cells remained unused in
the
camera case -- which I just got around to unpacking yesterday. (Really.)

Four of the cells were 2700mAh Sanyo AAs. They all measured about 1.23V,
rather lower than the 1.4V NiMH cells commonly charge up to, but close to
the "nominal" 1.25V of NiMH and nicad cells. Contrary to Urban Legend,
they
were not completely discharged.

I put them in a Canon 580EX II, and the flash fully charged up in less
than
two seconds. I fired off some shots. The first few recycled "instantly".
The
last two took about a half second. I didn't run down the cells, but it
was
obvious that two years of sitting on the shelf had not rendered them
unusable.

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where
it came from, I don't know.

So you got dead battery performance and maybe 3 flashes and therefore
batteries don't self discharge?
Click to expand...
Where did I say ANY SUCH THING?

I'm going to jump down your throat on this one, because I find most people
don't understand plain English. If I say "Some people have trouble getting
along with their bosses", most readers interpret that as "All people have
trouble getting along with their bosses." Really.

The cells WERE NOT DEAD. After two years they were at the nominal voltage
for a nicad or NiMH cell. Furthermore, they operated the flash without any
difficulty.
 
"Dave Platt" <dplatt@radagast.org> wrote in message
news:lhqhr8-5o7.ln1@radagast.org...
In article <jc57nd$dlp$1@dont-email.me>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where it came from, I don't know.

You seem to be drawing a sweeping conclusion based on one data point.
Not always a reliable approach?
Click to expand...
It's not the only data point. I've never seen any NiMH cell "rapidly"
self-discharge. At least, not over a period of a month or two, which is the
general claim.

Furthermore, the claim is that ALL NiMH cells "rapidly" self-discharge. I've
seen both MAHA and (now) Sanyo cells hold their charge.


Then why can four NiMH cells sit for two years and still be able to
properly
power a high-drain device?

Likely possibility: the NiMH cells that you installed two years ago
use an internel chemistry which is superior to that used in
early-generation NiMH cells.
Click to expand...
Unlikely. These are not low-discharge-rate cells.


Newer ones are much better. The ones advertised as "low self
discharge rate" (e.g Immedions, Eneloops, and the like) have been
available for several years, and I believe that the improved
low-self-discharge technologies have begun appearing in more
"mainstream" NiMH cells which aren't specifically advertised in this
way.
Click to expand...
These cells are about three years old. And they're high-capacity -- 2700mAh.
To the best of my knowledgte, low-discharge cells have a lower capacity. I
think.


PS: I will not gainsay anyone's claim to have seen rapid NiMH
self-discharge. It's just that I haven't seen it. And I've been using NiMH
cells for almost five years.
 
In article <jc5fkq$3f7$1@dont-email.me>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The cells WERE NOT DEAD. After two years they were at the nominal voltage
for a nicad or NiMH cell. Furthermore, they operated the flash without any
difficulty.
Click to expand...
To truly know whether (or how much) the cells had self-discharged,
you'd need to actually run them down to exhaustion and see how much
useful charge had been retained.

NiMH cells, like NiCd cells, have a rather flat discharge curve. Their
terminal voltage, and their ability to deliver current on demand,
don't change very much as they discharge... until they get down to
somewhere around the 10% charge level, at which point they "fall off
of a cliff" quite rapidly. They tend to work perfectly well, until
they die.

So, the fact that your batteries had a nominal terminal voltage, and
were able to charge the flash quickly and take a few photos, is useful
information, but by no means complete enough to diagnose whether (or
how much) the cells had discharged during storage.

--
Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org> AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
 
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Cydrome Leader" <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote in message
news:jc5bal$9ic$2@reader1.panix.com...
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

I've never had problems with the supposed rapid self-discharge of NiMH
cells. And now I have proof.

Almost two years ago, I visited a friend in Gold Bar WA for Christmas. I
took some camera equipment, including freshly charged NiMH cells for the
flash. I didn't take any flash pictures, so the cells remained unused in
the
camera case -- which I just got around to unpacking yesterday. (Really.)

Four of the cells were 2700mAh Sanyo AAs. They all measured about 1.23V,
rather lower than the 1.4V NiMH cells commonly charge up to, but close to
the "nominal" 1.25V of NiMH and nicad cells. Contrary to Urban Legend,
they
were not completely discharged.

I put them in a Canon 580EX II, and the flash fully charged up in less
than
two seconds. I fired off some shots. The first few recycled "instantly".
The
last two took about a half second. I didn't run down the cells, but it
was
obvious that two years of sitting on the shelf had not rendered them
unusable.

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where
it came from, I don't know.

So you got dead battery performance and maybe 3 flashes and therefore
batteries don't self discharge?

Where did I say ANY SUCH THING?

I'm going to jump down your throat on this one, because I find most people
don't understand plain English. If I say "Some people have trouble getting
along with their bosses", most readers interpret that as "All people have
trouble getting along with their bosses." Really.

The cells WERE NOT DEAD. After two years they were at the nominal voltage
for a nicad or NiMH cell. Furthermore, they operated the flash without any
difficulty.


Your test was unscientific, undocumented, anecdotal, incomplete.
Click to expand...
You are certainly entitled to draw any conclusions you wish
and base your personal decisions on those conclusions.

Your blanket statement about NiMH based on your sample-of-one
anecdote requires extrapolation beyond reason. "Proof" is not
a word I'd have used to describe your result.

I can say that my personal experience differs from yours.
And I get along just fine with my boss. Really!!
 
"William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jc5fvm$5p7$1@dont-email.me...
"Dave Platt" <dplatt@radagast.org> wrote in message
news:lhqhr8-5o7.ln1@radagast.org...
In article <jc57nd$dlp$1@dont-email.me>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where it came from, I don't know.

You seem to be drawing a sweeping conclusion based on one data point.
Not always a reliable approach?

It's not the only data point. I've never seen any NiMH cell "rapidly"
self-discharge. At least, not over a period of a month or two, which is
the
general claim.
Click to expand...
The local outlet of the Lidl store chain sometimes has NiMh cells at a very
tempting price so I bought loads - unfortunately they're no good for the
majority of occasional use items or clocks because they need tediously
frequent recharging.

As someone else pointed out there are advanced chemistry types - but more
expensive and harder to find.
 
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
"Cydrome Leader" <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote in message
news:jc5bal$9ic$2@reader1.panix.com...
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

I've never had problems with the supposed rapid self-discharge of NiMH
cells. And now I have proof.

Almost two years ago, I visited a friend in Gold Bar WA for Christmas. I
took some camera equipment, including freshly charged NiMH cells for the
flash. I didn't take any flash pictures, so the cells remained unused in
the
camera case -- which I just got around to unpacking yesterday. (Really.)

Four of the cells were 2700mAh Sanyo AAs. They all measured about 1.23V,
rather lower than the 1.4V NiMH cells commonly charge up to, but close to
the "nominal" 1.25V of NiMH and nicad cells. Contrary to Urban Legend,
they
were not completely discharged.

I put them in a Canon 580EX II, and the flash fully charged up in less
than
two seconds. I fired off some shots. The first few recycled "instantly".
The
last two took about a half second. I didn't run down the cells, but it
was
obvious that two years of sitting on the shelf had not rendered them
unusable.

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where
it came from, I don't know.

So you got dead battery performance and maybe 3 flashes and therefore
batteries don't self discharge?

Where did I say ANY SUCH THING?
Click to expand...
sorry you got 100 full power flashes before the batteries died.

I'm going to jump down your throat on this one, because I find most people
don't understand plain English. If I say "Some people have trouble getting
along with their bosses", most readers interpret that as "All people have
trouble getting along with their bosses." Really.
Click to expand...
people that talk about jumping down throats really need to shut the fuck
up and not be talking about how to get along with a boss. Really.

The cells WERE NOT DEAD. After two years they were at the nominal voltage
for a nicad or NiMH cell. Furthermore, they operated the flash without any
Click to expand...
There's nothing quite like the no load battery test.

difficulty.
Click to expand...
yeah, for 3 flashes until the flash was unable to even recycle anymore.
 
"Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote in
news:hquFq.145226$GZ1.136984@newsfe02.ams2:

"William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jc5fvm$5p7$1@dont-email.me...
"Dave Platt" <dplatt@radagast.org> wrote in message
news:lhqhr8-5o7.ln1@radagast.org...
In article <jc57nd$dlp$1@dont-email.me>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter
malarkey. Where it came from, I don't know.

You seem to be drawing a sweeping conclusion based on one data
point. Not always a reliable approach?

It's not the only data point. I've never seen any NiMH cell "rapidly"
self-discharge. At least, not over a period of a month or two, which
is the
general claim.

The local outlet of the Lidl store chain sometimes has NiMh cells at a
very tempting price so I bought loads - unfortunately they're no good
for the majority of occasional use items or clocks because they need
tediously frequent recharging.

As someone else pointed out there are advanced chemistry types - but
more expensive and harder to find.
Click to expand...
I bought a 4 pack of Eveready NiMH cells for my hommade 2 watt bicycle
headlight,it outputs 200 lumens for .65A draw,and I go a long time(months)
before having to recharge,unless I use the light heavily.Of course,my
design does not draw any current when OFF.

some items have a draw even when not in use.
like my low cost Polaroid digital camera.

"Pre-charged" NiMH cells have a lower self-discharge rate,but they don't
seem to be all that more expennsive than regular NiMH.
they are slightly lower in mAH capacity.(2100mAH vs 2300mAH)

I'd ask the OP how many flashes or shots he got from his stored NiMH cells
before they needed recharge.
seems to me that 1.2V is pretty much "discharged" for NiMH cells.
ISTR that 1.1V is the low limit.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com
 
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns9FB9ABAE3C1EAjyaniklocalnetcom@216.168.3.44...

"Pre-charged" NiMH cells have a lower self-discharge rate,but they don't
seem to be all that more expennsive than regular NiMH.
they are slightly lower in mAH capacity.(2100mAH vs 2300mAH)

I'd ask the OP how many flashes or shots he got from his stored
NiMH cells before they needed recharge.
seems to me that 1.2V is pretty much "discharged" for NiMH cells.
ISTR that 1.1V is the low limit.
Click to expand...
I didn't run down the flash. I will do so tonight or tomorrow.

1.25V is considered the nominal operating voltage of nicad or NiMH cells.
(The point another poster made about the relatively flat discharge was
well-taken.) The "discharged" point is, as it is for cells of most
chemistries, 1.0V.
 
"Cydrome Leader" <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote in message
news:jc5opq$7k7$1@reader1.panix.com...

yeah, for 3 flashes until the flash was unable to even recycle anymore.
Click to expand...
You're determined to deliberately misread what I wrote, aren't you?
 
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns9FB9ABAE3C1EAjyaniklocalnetcom@216.168.3.44...

"Pre-charged" NiMH cells have a lower self-discharge rate,but they don't
seem to be all that more expennsive than regular NiMH.
they are slightly lower in mAH capacity.(2100mAH vs 2300mAH)

I'd ask the OP how many flashes or shots he got from his stored
NiMH cells before they needed recharge.
seems to me that 1.2V is pretty much "discharged" for NiMH cells.
ISTR that 1.1V is the low limit.

I didn't run down the flash. I will do so tonight or tomorrow.

1.25V is considered the nominal operating voltage of nicad or NiMH cells.
(The point another poster made about the relatively flat discharge was
well-taken.) The "discharged" point is, as it is for cells of most
chemistries, 1.0V.


What was the load current for your voltage measurement?
Click to expand...
 
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
"Cydrome Leader" <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote in message
news:jc5opq$7k7$1@reader1.panix.com...

yeah, for 3 flashes until the flash was unable to even recycle anymore.

You're determined to deliberately misread what I wrote, aren't you?
Click to expand...
Go slam some doors or something, you might be better at that than testing batteries.
 
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:08:27 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

"Dave Platt" <dplatt@radagast.org> wrote in message
news:lhqhr8-5o7.ln1@radagast.org...
In article <jc57nd$dlp$1@dont-email.me>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The belief that NiMH cells rapidly self-discharge is utter malarkey.
Where it came from, I don't know.

You seem to be drawing a sweeping conclusion based on one data point.
Not always a reliable approach?

It's not the only data point. I've never seen any NiMH cell "rapidly"
self-discharge. At least, not over a period of a month or two, which is the
general claim.

Furthermore, the claim is that ALL NiMH cells "rapidly" self-discharge. I've
seen both MAHA and (now) Sanyo cells hold their charge.


Then why can four NiMH cells sit for two years and still be able to
properly
power a high-drain device?

Likely possibility: the NiMH cells that you installed two years ago
use an internel chemistry which is superior to that used in
early-generation NiMH cells.

Unlikely. These are not low-discharge-rate cells.


Newer ones are much better. The ones advertised as "low self
discharge rate" (e.g Immedions, Eneloops, and the like) have been
available for several years, and I believe that the improved
low-self-discharge technologies have begun appearing in more
"mainstream" NiMH cells which aren't specifically advertised in this
way.

These cells are about three years old. And they're high-capacity -- 2700mAh.
To the best of my knowledgte, low-discharge cells have a lower capacity. I
think.


PS: I will not gainsay anyone's claim to have seen rapid NiMH
self-discharge. It's just that I haven't seen it. And I've been using NiMH
cells for almost five years.
Click to expand...
Shall I send you some glorious AA examples that never held enough
charge to operate a Canon Powershot A200 a week after a full charge?
I have them in both Duracell and no-name.

And no, it's *not* due to any shortcomings in the charger or camera.
Another brand of cells now delivers, months after charge.
 
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:26:03 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

Four of the cells were 2700mAh Sanyo AAs. They all measured about 1.23V,
rather lower than the 1.4V NiMH cells commonly charge up to, but close to
the "nominal" 1.25V of NiMH and nicad cells. Contrary to Urban Legend, they
were not completely discharged.
Click to expand...
NiMH cells do NOT totally discharge themselves. They discharge to
about 50% of capacity (by self-discharge) and then just sit there.

For example, here are some curves I ran for an Energizer 2300ma-hr
cell:
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/NiMH/Energizer-NiMH-2300.jpg>
and for an Duracell 2050ma-hr cell:
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/NiMH/Duracelll-NiMH-2050.jpg>
There were brand new cells used to test the assertion that NiMH cells
need to be charge cycled a few times before they reach full capacity.
Basically, that's true.

Note the voltages (under 1C load). For the Energizer, it starts off
at 1.35v and starts to die at about 1.10v. If you put a load on your
Sanyo cells, I'm fairly sure your 1.23v no load voltage will drop to
something around 1.18v. In other words, your Sanyo batteries
self-discharged until they were almost dead, and stopped.

I recently had a similar experience to what you found. I have two old
Norelco rotary shavers. I received both with dead batteries and
replaced them with NiMH cells of dubious origin. I only charge them
when needed, except this time, when a dry squall dropped a few trees
through the power lines.
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/2011-12-03-Storm/>
When I dug out the shavers, the LCD indicator showed a nearly full
charge (about 80%). However, when I tried to use it, both lasted less
than 60 seconds. My guess(tm) is that I hadn't charged it since last
winter (9 months).

That's fairly close to what you observed. There was sufficient
voltage for the LCD indicator to proclaim a nearly full charge, but
not enough stored energy to do much useful work.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
 
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:20:52 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

For example, here are some curves I ran for an Energizer 2300ma-hr
cell:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/NiMH/Energizer-NiMH-2300.jpg
and for an Duracell 2050ma-hr cell:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/NiMH/Duracelll-NiMH-2050.jpg
There were brand new cells used to test the assertion that NiMH cells
need to be charge cycled a few times before they reach full capacity.
Basically, that's true.
Click to expand...
Hmmm... I haven't done anything with the batteries I used for this
test since May 29, 2011. They've just been sitting on the shelf. I
recall recharging them after I was done with the test. I'll run the
same 1C discharge test again in a few days and see how much capacity
is left after 7 months. This should be interesting. 1C is a heavy
load, but does yield fast results.

Note: I don't have phone or DSL at my house at this time and have
dragged my home computah to my office. This test will need to wait
until AT&T puts fixes things. Patience.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
 
"Jeff Liebermann" <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote in message
news:imdde7tskffaahnjibtfbo0s81ggt2aits@4ax.com...
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:20:52 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com
wrote:

For example, here are some curves I ran for an Energizer 2300ma-hr
cell:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/NiMH/Energizer-NiMH-2300.jpg
and for an Duracell 2050ma-hr cell:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/NiMH/Duracelll-NiMH-2050.jpg
There were brand new cells used to test the assertion that NiMH cells
need to be charge cycled a few times before they reach full capacity.
Basically, that's true.

Hmmm... I haven't done anything with the batteries I used for this
test since May 29, 2011. They've just been sitting on the shelf. I
recall recharging them after I was done with the test. I'll run the
same 1C discharge test again in a few days and see how much capacity
is left after 7 months. This should be interesting. 1C is a heavy
load, but does yield fast results.
Click to expand...
Thanks. That would be interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top