J
j.b. miller
Guest
ok lets see if this works
--
Jay Miller
Temtronic Designs Inc.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~temtronic/homepage.htm
--
Jay Miller
Temtronic Designs Inc.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~temtronic/homepage.htm
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:23:06 -0400, "j.b. miller"
<invalidjbmiller@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Looks OK to me.
John
<invalidjbmiller@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Looks OK to me.
John
P
Paul Burke
Guest
John Larkin wrote:
I can't see either of these posts.
A
Al Borowski
Guest
Paul Burke wrote:
Al
I can see Johns but not yours.
Al
P
Paul Burke
Guest
Al Borowski wrote:
No, can't see Al's either. But I can see Genome's.
G
Genome
Guest
"Paul Burke" <paul@scazon.com> wrote in message
news:3gtcv2Fe7ijiU1@individual.net...
Where are you? and, please, stop looking.
DNA
news:3gtcv2Fe7ijiU1@individual.net...
Shit, I was just looking at mine as it went into hers.
Where are you? and, please, stop looking.
DNA
G
Guy Macon
Guest
Al Borowski wrote:
Just a note to those who read Al Borowski's posts; Replying to these posts
gives Al the ability to censor and edit your posts by using the "Supersedes"
header. See [ http://www.templetons.com/usenet-format/supersedes.html ].
It's just a "feature" of Usenet that you may not be aware of.
Cheers,
Guy
Just a note to those who read Al Borowski's posts; Replying to these posts
gives Al the ability to censor and edit your posts by using the "Supersedes"
header. See [ http://www.templetons.com/usenet-format/supersedes.html ].
It's just a "feature" of Usenet that you may not be aware of.
Cheers,
Guy
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:00:11 +0000, Guy Macon
<_see.web.page_@_www.guymacon.com_> wrote:
John
<_see.web.page_@_www.guymacon.com_> wrote:
Maybe he could, but only creeps actually do things like that.
John
G
Guy Macon
Guest
John Larkin wrote:
a technical fact. I don't think I was being impolite about it."
Al is very big on letting people know about various Usenet features.
In the words of Al Borowski (exact quote), "I was just pointing out
a technical fact. I don't think I was being impolite about it."
Al is very big on letting people know about various Usenet features.
A
Al Borowski
Guest
Yup. Point them out all you want, I don't care
I thought I was killfiled, by the way.
love,
Al
R
Richard Henry
Guest
"Al Borowski" <al.borowski@EraseThis.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:42aa92fd$0$25987$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Followups set accordingly.
(just kidding)
news:42aa92fd$0$25987$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
All discussions of Guy Macon's killfiles belong in alt.killfiles.guy-macon.In the words of Al Borowski (exact quote), "I was just pointing out
a technical fact. I don't think I was being impolite about it."
Al is very big on letting people know about various Usenet features.
Yup. Point them out all you want, I don't care
I thought I was killfiled, by the way.
Followups set accordingly.
(just kidding)
G
Guy Macon
Guest
Richard Henry wrote:
are obsessed with the contents of my killfile - I am second only
to Tim Skirvin in this regard - but the topic certainly generates
enough traffic to justify a newsgroup dedicated to it.
We could discuss, for example, the fact that I am now using a
scoring-based killfile system with rudamentary Bayesian filtering
(See [http://www.paulgraham.com/better.html]). This scheme works
very well indeed, but alas it blurs the edges of the concepts
of "in the killfile" and "out of the killfile." With your proposed
newsgroup, posts of "I thought I was in your killfile" could be
refered to the newsgroup FAQ...
I think that's a *great* idea! I have no idea why so many people
are obsessed with the contents of my killfile - I am second only
to Tim Skirvin in this regard - but the topic certainly generates
enough traffic to justify a newsgroup dedicated to it.
We could discuss, for example, the fact that I am now using a
scoring-based killfile system with rudamentary Bayesian filtering
(See [http://www.paulgraham.com/better.html]). This scheme works
very well indeed, but alas it blurs the edges of the concepts
of "in the killfile" and "out of the killfile." With your proposed
newsgroup, posts of "I thought I was in your killfile" could be
refered to the newsgroup FAQ...
Y
YD
Guest
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:00:11 +0000, Guy Macon
<_see.web.page_@_www.guymacon.com_> wrote:
have "X-no-archive:yes" in your headers while Al doesn't.
Hey Guy, you're taking all this too seriously, lighten up a bit, will
you? Now repeat after me: "It's only usenet, have fun." Could you do
that? Oh, you did, good, I knew you could.
- YD.
--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.
<_see.web.page_@_www.guymacon.com_> wrote:
Just like you or anyone else could, what's the big deal? I note you
have "X-no-archive:yes" in your headers while Al doesn't.
Hey Guy, you're taking all this too seriously, lighten up a bit, will
you? Now repeat after me: "It's only usenet, have fun." Could you do
that? Oh, you did, good, I knew you could.
- YD.
--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.
M
Mark Zenier
Guest
In article <11ajsbf21akif82@corp.supernews.com>,
Guy Macon <_see.web.page_@_www.guymacon.com_> wrote:
do that. (If you CAN still do that. Any news server set up to prevent
vandalism will filter it out, as the technique has been used by flood-
bots for years).
Part of my spam filtering system detects any "Supersedes" headers and
I'll collect your or anyone else's scalp if they try. I've got a small
collection.
Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com Washington State resident
Guy Macon <_see.web.page_@_www.guymacon.com_> wrote:
That's abuse of the net, and just about every ISP will TOS you if you
do that. (If you CAN still do that. Any news server set up to prevent
vandalism will filter it out, as the technique has been used by flood-
bots for years).
Part of my spam filtering system detects any "Supersedes" headers and
I'll collect your or anyone else's scalp if they try. I've got a small
collection.
Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com Washington State resident
K
keith
Guest
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:52:50 +0000, Mark Zenier wrote:
"cancel". Sure, most ISPs don't recognize them, but it's my words I'm
correcting/deleting. If you're talking about a snake=in-the-grass
altering others articles, I'm with your 100%.
--
Keith
Ok, I'll play dumb here. Whoy would you care if I did a "superceeds" or
"cancel". Sure, most ISPs don't recognize them, but it's my words I'm
correcting/deleting. If you're talking about a snake=in-the-grass
altering others articles, I'm with your 100%.
--
Keith
G
Guy Macon
Guest
In another newsgroup, Al pointed out that he canceled one of his
posts that I was reacting to from within Google right after sending
it. I was not aware of that, and in light of what I now know, I
have no beef with Al, and thus won't be responding to this thread.
posts that I was reacting to from within Google right after sending
it. I was not aware of that, and in light of what I now know, I
have no beef with Al, and thus won't be responding to this thread.
M
Mark Zenier
Guest
In article <pan.2005.06.13.02.24.44.327975@att.bizzzz>,
keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
"clue by four". Sadly, most of that sort of fool has an alternate account
or soon gets one, but it tends to make them a bit more circumspect when
they realize there actually is a limit to what they can do here.
Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com Washington State resident
keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
The latter. Some folks have to be hit up the side of the head with a
"clue by four". Sadly, most of that sort of fool has an alternate account
or soon gets one, but it tends to make them a bit more circumspect when
they realize there actually is a limit to what they can do here.
Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com Washington State resident