TEK 7904 before 7104?

F

Funky

Guest
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of the 7904,
even though the model number is smaller. What years were the models
introduced?
Funky
 
7904 was introduced around 1972 and the 7104 was introduced around 1978.
The 7104 was very impressive with it's fine trace going to 1Ghz. It had a
problem with prolonged viewing with the intensity set high. It wasn't meant
for the typical bozo leaving a bright trace centered on-screen for hours.

--
change .combo to .com for correct email

***************************************************
"We ought always to know precisely why a given job
is done in a particular way, and why it is done at
all, and why it can't be done more efficiently,
if it must be done at all."-- T.J.Watson

***************************************************

"Funky" <hello@hello.com> wrote in message
news:c7s0s0$g9k$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of the
7904,
even though the model number is smaller. What years were the models
introduced?
Funky
 
Funky schrieb:
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of the 7904,
even though the model number is smaller. What years were the models
introduced?
Funky
Indeed, the higher the number after the 7 indicates the higher bandwith,
but only the first number after the 7, and after the 9 comes the 10
so they only took the "1" of the 10...
Otherwise they have to call it 71004

Jorgen
dj0ud
 
In article <c7s0s0$g9k$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>, hello@hello.com says...
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of the 7904,
even though the model number is smaller. What years were the models
introduced?
Funky
Stan Griffiths, W7NI is an ex-Tek guy who's good at researching (or just
plain knowing) the answers to these types of questions. He spends a lot
of time on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TekScopes/ helping people out
with similar questions. I'd suggest checking the group out -- there are
several other 7104 drivers around, and the subject has come up before.

-- jm

------------------------------------------------------
http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx
Note: My E-mail address has been altered to avoid spam
------------------------------------------------------
 
"Funky" <hello@hello.com> wrote in message news:<c7s0s0$g9k$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>...
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of the 7904,
even though the model number is smaller. What years were the models
introduced?
Funky

As the other poster said, the 7104 was introduced later than the 7904.
Tektronix on the website said: 7904(A) 1974, 7104 1978.

BTW: The 7904 is inside (circuit layout, etc.) basically a 7104, but
without an MCP crt.
AFAIK Jim Yanik mentioned this once.

Seems pretty correct to me: My 7904 displays nicely the 1,04 GHz of my
R&S signal generator.

Model numbers nomenclature:
first: always 7 == 7000 series

secound: is BW, 1 = 1000 MHz , 9= 500 mHz, 8= 400 MHz, 7= 200/250
MHz, 5 and 6: 100 MHz (7603 !!) , 4 and 3 = low BW appr. 65 MHz.
series
Pls. don't ask me why: I could not figure out the basic idea behind
this, but after checking all literature I have, that's it.

third: Type of dsiplay/storage: 0 == non storage, 1= storage CRT,
2=improved storage, 3= high writing rate storage, 4= dual beam
(two-gun crt), 5= digital storage

fourth: number of compartments for plug-ins, range I found is 2, 3, 4
..
The "2" I found only in the 7912 (digitizer model wit ha kind of
analogue storage crt and and a complex ciruitry for getting the data
out, very tricky made).
"3" is well known to most of us: e.g. 7603.
"4" are all the major laboratory scopes known for: 7104, 7904, 7704(A)

just my two cents..

hth,
Andreas
 
The 7104 was famous for being able to display the 350 ps risetime of a 10 hz
pulse. The were very proud of that and being able to Polaroid it too..
Those were the days !

--
change .combo to .com for correct email

***************************************************
"We ought always to know precisely why a given job
is done in a particular way, and why it is done at
all, and why it can't be done more efficiently,
if it must be done at all."-- T.J.Watson

***************************************************

"TekMan" <and7@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:6a624601.0405132312.52959116@posting.google.com...
"Funky" <hello@hello.com> wrote in message
news:<c7s0s0$g9k$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>...
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of the
7904,
even though the model number is smaller. What years were the models
introduced?
Funky


As the other poster said, the 7104 was introduced later than the 7904.
Tektronix on the website said: 7904(A) 1974, 7104 1978.

BTW: The 7904 is inside (circuit layout, etc.) basically a 7104, but
without an MCP crt.
AFAIK Jim Yanik mentioned this once.

Seems pretty correct to me: My 7904 displays nicely the 1,04 GHz of my
R&S signal generator.

Model numbers nomenclature:
first: always 7 == 7000 series

secound: is BW, 1 = 1000 MHz , 9= 500 mHz, 8= 400 MHz, 7= 200/250
MHz, 5 and 6: 100 MHz (7603 !!) , 4 and 3 = low BW appr. 65 MHz.
series
Pls. don't ask me why: I could not figure out the basic idea behind
this, but after checking all literature I have, that's it.

third: Type of dsiplay/storage: 0 == non storage, 1= storage CRT,
2=improved storage, 3= high writing rate storage, 4= dual beam
(two-gun crt), 5= digital storage

fourth: number of compartments for plug-ins, range I found is 2, 3, 4
.
The "2" I found only in the 7912 (digitizer model wit ha kind of
analogue storage crt and and a complex ciruitry for getting the data
out, very tricky made).
"3" is well known to most of us: e.g. 7603.
"4" are all the major laboratory scopes known for: 7104, 7904, 7704(A)

just my two cents..

hth,
Andreas
 
and7@bigfoot.com (TekMan) wrote in
news:6a624601.0405132312.52959116@posting.google.com:

"Funky" <hello@hello.com> wrote in message
news:<c7s0s0$g9k$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>...
The bandwidth of the 7104 went to 1Ghz as opposed to the 500Mhz of
the 7904, even though the model number is smaller. What years were
the models introduced?
Funky


As the other poster said, the 7104 was introduced later than the 7904.
Tektronix on the website said: 7904(A) 1974, 7104 1978.

BTW: The 7904 is inside (circuit layout, etc.) basically a 7104, but
without an MCP crt.
AFAIK Jim Yanik mentioned this once.
No,the 7904A is comparable to the 7104.The earlier 7904 *non-A* had
different,less "advanced" circuitry. The A model 7904 used "feed-forward"
amplifiers in the vertical,and used elastomeric connectors for IC
connections to the PCB.The A model also used teflon PCB material for part
of the vert.amplifier.
Seems pretty correct to me: My 7904 displays nicely the 1,04 GHz of my
R&S signal generator.

Model numbers nomenclature:
first: always 7 == 7000 series

secound: is BW, 1 = 1000 MHz , 9= 500 mHz, 8= 400 MHz, 7= 200/250
MHz, 5 and 6: 100 MHz (7603 !!) , 4 and 3 = low BW appr. 65 MHz.
series
Pls. don't ask me why: I could not figure out the basic idea behind
this, but after checking all literature I have, that's it.

third: Type of dsiplay/storage: 0 == non storage, 1= storage CRT,
2=improved storage, 3= high writing rate storage, 4= dual beam
(two-gun crt), 5= digital storage
No,there was a 7504 that had bistable storage,a real piece of crap,too.
BW was only 75 Mhz,IIRC.

fourth: number of compartments for plug-ins, range I found is 2, 3, 4
.
The "2" I found only in the 7912 (digitizer model wit ha kind of
analogue storage crt and and a complex ciruitry for getting the data
out, very tricky made).
"3" is well known to most of us: e.g. 7603.
"4" are all the major laboratory scopes known for: 7104, 7904, 7704(A)

just my two cents..

hth,
Andreas
I do not believe there was any official nomenclature for designating the 7K
series.

The 4-holers had a 4 at the end,while 3-holers had a 3.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
Kevin Carney wrote:

The 7104 was famous for being able to display the 350 ps risetime of a 10 hz
pulse. The were very proud of that and being able to Polaroid it too.
Those were the days !



Still not bad going, for a single shot. My TDS8001 has 25- and 50-GHz
plugins, but takes one point per shot. With a 20-Hz rep rate laser, and
100 averages, it takes an hour to get a trace of a 1-ns window.

MCP CRTs and Polaroid cameras look pretty good after staring at this for
awhile.

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
 
Jim Yanik wrote...

Don't forget the cool 2467B portable scope with
its built-in image intensifier.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)
 
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:c83d8302tab@drn.newsguy.com:

Don't forget the cool 2467B portable scope with
its built-in image intensifier.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)
That unit's CRT was developed from the 7104 CRT,uses the same technology.
Those 2467 series are referred to as "BrightEye" scopes. ;-)

The CRT's contain microchannel plate (MCP)intensifiers,like a night-vision
scope's image intensifier.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
Phil Hobbs <hobbs@SpamMeSenseless.us.ibm.com> wrote in
news:10aa980jdt79901@corp.supernews.com:

Kevin Carney wrote:

The 7104 was famous for being able to display the 350 ps risetime of a
10 hz pulse. The were very proud of that and being able to Polaroid it
too. Those were the days !



Still not bad going, for a single shot. My TDS8001 has 25- and 50-GHz
plugins, but takes one point per shot. With a 20-Hz rep rate laser,
and 100 averages, it takes an hour to get a trace of a 1-ns window.

MCP CRTs and Polaroid cameras look pretty good after staring at this
for awhile.

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
Too bad TEK sold most of the manufacturing units that made these fine
scopes.No more new MCP scopes from TEK. They don't even make CRTs anymore.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
Jim Yanik wrote...
Winfield Hill wrote ...

Don't forget the cool 2467B portable scope with
its built-in image intensifier.

That unit's CRT was developed from the 7104 CRT,uses the same
technology. Those 2467 series are referred to as "BrightEye"
scopes. ;-)
How do you think the 400MHz 2467B's writing rate compares with
the 7104? One nice thing about the 2467B is its full-screen
MCP area viewing, IIRC.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)
 
Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> writes:

Too bad TEK sold most of the manufacturing units that made these fine
scopes.No more new MCP scopes from TEK. They don't even make CRTs anymore.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
That's why there is a couple of their old scopes in our lab. The new DPOs
are wonderful, but sometimes pretty tricky to find problems with.

--
Steven D. Swift, novatech@eskimo.com, http://www.novatech-instr.com
NOVATECH INSTRUMENTS, INC. P.O. Box 55997
206.301.8986, fax 206.363.4367 Seattle, Washington 98155 USA
 
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:c83t0101g8b@drn.newsguy.com:

Jim Yanik wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote ...

Don't forget the cool 2467B portable scope with
its built-in image intensifier.

That unit's CRT was developed from the 7104 CRT,uses the same
technology. Those 2467 series are referred to as "BrightEye"
scopes. ;-)

How do you think the 400MHz 2467B's writing rate compares with
the 7104? One nice thing about the 2467B is its full-screen
MCP area viewing, IIRC.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)
Well,I don't remember all the specs of each unit,and I don't have access to
the manuals anymore,so I really couldn't comment on this.

BTW,the 2400 series CRTs used an interesting final electron gun element,a
"quadupole lens",a specially shaped tube of metal that created a shaped
electrostatic field that allowed a shorter CRT and lower deflection
sensitivities,and still have a nice sharp beam spot.The older mesh lens
used in TEK CRTs caused a fuzzier beam spot due to diffraction.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
In article <Xns94E9D5D3CEE57jyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21>, Jim Yanik
<jyanik@abuse.gov> writes
Phil Hobbs <hobbs@SpamMeSenseless.us.ibm.com> wrote in
news:10aa980jdt79901@corp.supernews.com:

Kevin Carney wrote:

The 7104 was famous for being able to display the 350 ps risetime of a
10 hz pulse. The were very proud of that and being able to Polaroid it
too. Those were the days !



Still not bad going, for a single shot. My TDS8001 has 25- and 50-GHz
plugins, but takes one point per shot. With a 20-Hz rep rate laser,
and 100 averages, it takes an hour to get a trace of a 1-ns window.

MCP CRTs and Polaroid cameras look pretty good after staring at this
for awhile.

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs



Too bad TEK sold most of the manufacturing units that made these fine
scopes.No more new MCP scopes from TEK. They don't even make CRTs anymore.


I reckon the dynamic range of th analog crt scope was /is >20bits
compare with the 14bits of the best digital. Means .1mV/10V cant be seen

--
ddwyer
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top