U
USER USER
Guest
I am evaluating SuperSpice simulator. Looks good; although I am more
interested in it's schematic capture.
I currently use industrial strenght spice simulators (along with Cadence
ADE/artist), therefore I have no need for it's spice engine.
I think the schematic capture part/component symbol generator has potential
and I believe you can spin it off as a configurable schematic capture only
product. The market is for existing (*)spice users who want to migrate to a
low-cost, easy to use schematic capture.
Here are some features that I see for this product:
1. scripting -- for formating spice/mixed-mode specific netlists, etc., and
for calling other simulators to run the generated netlist. Maybe allow
plug-in modules, which are specific to simulator target. This is openly
documented so others can write targets for hspice, pspice, smash, scad3,
etc.
2. Allow a mechanism for back annotation. Again, this can also be in form of
modules.
3. General components: allow veriloga, verilogd, vhdl, etc., to be treated
components which can be placed on the schematic.
Your competition in this arena is gEDA at the low-end and maybe silicon
canvas at the midrange.
Regards..
interested in it's schematic capture.
I currently use industrial strenght spice simulators (along with Cadence
ADE/artist), therefore I have no need for it's spice engine.
I think the schematic capture part/component symbol generator has potential
and I believe you can spin it off as a configurable schematic capture only
product. The market is for existing (*)spice users who want to migrate to a
low-cost, easy to use schematic capture.
Here are some features that I see for this product:
1. scripting -- for formating spice/mixed-mode specific netlists, etc., and
for calling other simulators to run the generated netlist. Maybe allow
plug-in modules, which are specific to simulator target. This is openly
documented so others can write targets for hspice, pspice, smash, scad3,
etc.
2. Allow a mechanism for back annotation. Again, this can also be in form of
modules.
3. General components: allow veriloga, verilogd, vhdl, etc., to be treated
components which can be placed on the schematic.
Your competition in this arena is gEDA at the low-end and maybe silicon
canvas at the midrange.
Regards..