F
Fred Bloggs
Guest
This will be one big experiment.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
J
John Robertson
Guest
On 2020/10/03 11:06 a.m., Fred Bloggs wrote:
That is why it is probably best to not rush the release of new vaccines
for new diseases - like Covid-19...
John :-#(#
This will be one big experiment.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm
That is why it is probably best to not rush the release of new vaccines
for new diseases - like Covid-19...
John :-#(#
R
Ricketty C
Guest
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 3:09:13 PM UTC-4, John Robertson wrote:
I don\'t believe this is the sort of effect vaccines are screened for. If they waited for full, unhurried testing to proceed and the vaccine was the \"leaky\" type, it would still be approved and utilized.
If you read the article, the risk for the vaccinated is not increased, only the un-vaccinated. Why would anyone want to forego a vaccine against this disease? I can see waiting a few months while the masses are vaccinated, but why would anyone want to take a 1 in 20 chance of dying?
I think it is pretty clear that the vaccine is by far the lesser of two evils.
--
Rick C.
+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On 2020/10/03 11:06 a.m., Fred Bloggs wrote:
This will be one big experiment.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm
That is why it is probably best to not rush the release of new vaccines
for new diseases - like Covid-19...
I don\'t believe this is the sort of effect vaccines are screened for. If they waited for full, unhurried testing to proceed and the vaccine was the \"leaky\" type, it would still be approved and utilized.
If you read the article, the risk for the vaccinated is not increased, only the un-vaccinated. Why would anyone want to forego a vaccine against this disease? I can see waiting a few months while the masses are vaccinated, but why would anyone want to take a 1 in 20 chance of dying?
I think it is pretty clear that the vaccine is by far the lesser of two evils.
--
Rick C.
+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 5:06:25 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Any vaccine against any rapidly mutating virus is \"leaky\". The classic examples are the various vaccines against the various (and rapidly evolving) strains of seasonal influenza. They don\'t seem to have made influenza more deadly, and we have been using them for years now..
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
This will be one big experiment.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm
Any vaccine against any rapidly mutating virus is \"leaky\". The classic examples are the various vaccines against the various (and rapidly evolving) strains of seasonal influenza. They don\'t seem to have made influenza more deadly, and we have been using them for years now..
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
R
Ricketty C
Guest
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 8:29:40 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
Just to be clear, the term \"virulent\" has two meanings (at least). One is to be severe or harmful while the other is simply to be infectious. So a more infectious strain could apply without being more deadly. It just depends on what Humpty Dumpty meant when the term was used, no more and no less.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 5:06:25 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
This will be one big experiment.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm
Any vaccine against any rapidly mutating virus is \"leaky\". The classic examples are the various vaccines against the various (and rapidly evolving) strains of seasonal influenza. They don\'t seem to have made influenza more deadly, and we have been using them for years now..
Just to be clear, the term \"virulent\" has two meanings (at least). One is to be severe or harmful while the other is simply to be infectious. So a more infectious strain could apply without being more deadly. It just depends on what Humpty Dumpty meant when the term was used, no more and no less.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209