Shocking NASA Video Shows Carbon Emissions as if They Were Visible...

[Fred Bloggs]

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 8:17:45 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

It\'s not going to become uninhabitable and it is certainly no going to become a fireball.

If we don\'t slow down and reverse anthropogenic global warming very soon we will will run in to even more significant problems than the ones that are already giving us trouble, and we could see a human population crash if we mess up the climate enough to make out agriculture appreciably less productive.

None of this would make the earth uninhabitable, and while widespread forest fires are already problem the whole planet won\'t become any kind of fireball - Antarctica would be hard to set alight, as would the Sahara.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:17:39 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Yikes. In one year, the planet went from having a bit of CO2 up north
\"to envelop the entire planet as the months roll by.\"

I took a walk today and almost took my sweater off.

 

[Ricky]

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:17:45 PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

No problem. Larkin will be long dead by the time climate change has had a significant impact on the world.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[boB]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:41:51 -0700 (PDT), Ricky
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:17:45?PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

No problem. Larkin will be long dead by the time climate change has had a significant impact on the world.

What I hear will be a big problem is that there will be bugs. LOTS of
bugs ! Ewwwww !

 

[John Robertson]

On 2023/06/21 3:17 p.m., Fred Bloggs wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Why is the rate of change of the CO2 in the atmosphere linear?

John ;-#)#

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 3:05:35 PM UTC+10, John Robertson wrote:

On 2023/06/21 3:17 p.m., Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Why is the rate of change of the CO2 in the atmosphere linear?

It isn\'t.

https://capegrim.csiro.au/

What made you think that it was? The seasonal ripples clearly aren\'t, though they are smaller in the southern hemisphere, but the current trend is bending up as more people burn more fossil carbon. We ought to start turning that around but it hasn\'t happened yet.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 12:57:54 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:17:39 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Yikes. In one year, the planet went from having a bit of CO2 up north \"to envelop the entire planet as the months roll by.\"

I wonder which bit of moronic climate change denial propaganda gave John Larkin his \"bit of CO2 up north\".

Atmospheric CO2 spreads out pretty rapidly - the global air circulation deals with that. There are difference between the northern and southern atmospheres - the north has more land and more seasonal vegetation, but there isn\'t a lot in it.

> I took a walk today and almost took my sweater off.

It takes muscular development and skill to actually get one on or off. Keep at it - you may master it eventually. In the mean time take your wife with you.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 8:27:02 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 8:17:45 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
It\'s not going to become uninhabitable and it is certainly no going to become a fireball.

Sure it is. Even the dirt beneath their feet is dying.

If we don\'t slow down and reverse anthropogenic global warming very soon we will will run in to even more significant problems than the ones that are already giving us trouble, and we could see a human population crash if we mess up the climate enough to make out agriculture appreciably less productive.

It can\'t be reversed. The only control mankind has over it is to stop emitting GHG. The air scrubbing technology is a joke, and until they think of something more feasible, they\'re not going to reverse anything.

None of this would make the earth uninhabitable, and while widespread forest fires are already problem the whole planet won\'t become any kind of fireball - Antarctica would be hard to set alight, as would the Sahara.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 10:57:54 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:17:39 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
Yikes. In one year, the planet went from having a bit of CO2 up north
\"to envelop the entire planet as the months roll by.\"

Right- it was based upon detailed data of emissions, and sequestration, from the record in the year 2021. So it\'s a superposition of CO2 emissions.

\"There are three videos to look at, covering different regions of the world.. They show CO2 being released in 2021, with emissions colored orange for fossil fuels, red for burning biomass, green for land ecosystems, and blue for the ocean.\"

I took a walk today and almost took my sweater off.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 10:13:01 PM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 8:27:02 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 8:17:45 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
It\'s not going to become uninhabitable and it is certainly no going to become a fireball.

Sure it is. Even the dirt beneath their feet is dying.

Don\'t be silly. At worst it will contain different microbial life.

If we don\'t slow down and reverse anthropogenic global warming very soon we will will run in to even more significant problems than the ones that are already giving us trouble, and we could see a human population crash if we mess up the climate enough to make out agriculture appreciably less productive.

It can\'t be reversed.

Of course it could be reversed. Air scrubbing is ridiculously expensive, while getting our energy from solar panels and wind turbines actually saves money, but if we stop burning fossil carbon the atmosphere will presumably eventually revert to the interglacvial norm of 270 ppm, which would reverse anthropogenic global warming - the time constant seems to be about 800 years so it would take a while.

> The only control mankind has over it is to stop emitting GHG. The air scrubbing technology is a joke, and until they think of something more feasible, they\'re not going to reverse anything.

Current air-scrubbing technology is expensive, but it isn\'t a joke. Human ingenuity may eventually do better.

> > None of this would make the earth uninhabitable, and while widespread forest fires are already problem the whole planet won\'t become any kind of fireball - Antarctica would be hard to set alight, as would the Sahara.

Not a point that you\'ve bothered to address.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 05:16:14 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 10:57:54?PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:17:39 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
Yikes. In one year, the planet went from having a bit of CO2 up north
\"to envelop the entire planet as the months roll by.\"

Right- it was based upon detailed data of emissions, and sequestration, from the record in the year 2021. So it\'s a superposition of CO2 emissions.

\"There are three videos to look at, covering different regions of the world. They show CO2 being released in 2021, with emissions colored orange for fossil fuels, red for burning biomass, green for land ecosystems, and blue for the ocean.\"

I blame it all on Santa Claus, and the methane on his reindeer.

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:49:29 -0700, boB <boB@K7IQ.com> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:41:51 -0700 (PDT), Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:17:45?PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

No problem. Larkin will be long dead by the time climate change has had a significant impact on the world.

And so will my great-great-great grandchilden.

What I hear will be a big problem is that there will be bugs. LOTS of
bugs ! Ewwwww !

You are supposed to eat them.

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 22:05:26 -0700, John Robertson <jrr@flippers.com>
wrote:

On 2023/06/21 3:17 p.m., Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Why is the rate of change of the CO2 in the atmosphere linear?

John ;-#)#

Because the Little Ice Age ended, and the greedy plants are greening
the planet and gobbling up our hard-earned CO2.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 11:38:32 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 05:16:14 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 10:57:54?PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:17:39 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
Yikes. In one year, the planet went from having a bit of CO2 up north
\"to envelop the entire planet as the months roll by.\"

Right- it was based upon detailed data of emissions, and sequestration, from the record in the year 2021. So it\'s a superposition of CO2 emissions.

\"There are three videos to look at, covering different regions of the world. They show CO2 being released in 2021, with emissions colored orange for fossil fuels, red for burning biomass, green for land ecosystems, and blue for the ocean.\"

I blame it all on Santa Claus, and the methane on his reindeer.

That\'s climate change denial propaganda aimed at children, and elderly people in their second childhood.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 11:40:20 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:49:29 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:41:51 -0700 (PDT), Ricky <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:17:45?PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:

<snip>

No problem. Larkin will be long dead by the time climate change has had a significant impact on the world.

And so will my great-great-great grandchilden.

It\'s wise child that knows its own father. Somebody that is gullible enough to fall for climate change denial propaganda is likely to imagine that he has more children that he has actually fathered

What I hear will be a big problem is that there will be bugs. LOTS of bugs ! Ewwwww !

You are supposed to eat them.

Anybody who can swallow climate change denial propaganda can swallow pretty much anything.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 11:42:45 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 22:05:26 -0700, John Robertson <j...@flippers.com
wrote:
On 2023/06/21 3:17 p.m., Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Why is the rate of change of the CO2 in the atmosphere linear?

John ;-#)#

Because the Little Ice Age ended, and the greedy plants are greening the planet and gobbling up our hard-earned CO2.

The Little Ice Age wasn\'t actually global climate change , and the greedy plants aren\'t greedy enough to eat up all of the oxidised fossil carbon we are feeding them.

Plants don\'t live by CO2 alone. They also need water and minerals - a balanced diet. Just boosting the CO2 levels gives them an unbalanced diet, and they won\'t do well - the vegetable equivalent of America\'s obesity epidemic.. John Larkin claims not to be over-weight but he\'s decidedly fat-headed when it comes to climate change.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Sylvia Else]

On 22-June-23 8:17 am, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible

Thing is, if carbon dioxide emissions stopped, plants would eventually
suck all that remains out of the atmosphere, and then die. The planet
would become engulfed in ice due to the complete loss of the greenhouse
effect. Presumably even the most ardent greenie doesn\'t think that would
be a good idea.

The problem, to the extent that one exists, is not that carbon dioxide
is being emitted, but that more is being emitted than was emitted in the
past, and the videos cannot show that.

Sylvia.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 5:10:20 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 22-June-23 8:17 am, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
Thing is, if carbon dioxide emissions stopped, plants would eventually
suck all that remains out of the atmosphere, and then die.

Returning the carbon to the atmosphere as CO2.

> The planet would become engulfed in ice due to the complete loss of the greenhouse effect.

Which hasn\'t happened recently - not for the last billion years, anyway.

Presumably even the most ardent greenie doesn\'t think that would be a good idea.

The problem, to the extent that one exists, is not that carbon dioxide is being emitted, but that more is being emitted than was emitted in the past, and the videos cannot show that.

They don\'t have to. That problem is already well-known. It has happened before, some 55 million years ago. The ecosystem survived, though some species didn\'t.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 3:10:20 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 22-June-23 8:17 am, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Looking at the video presentation it\'s no wonder the Earth is turning into an uninhabitable fireball.

https://www.sciencealert.com/shocking-nasa-video-shows-carbon-emissions-as-if-they-were-visible
Thing is, if carbon dioxide emissions stopped, plants would eventually
suck all that remains out of the atmosphere, and then die. The planet
would become engulfed in ice due to the complete loss of the greenhouse
effect. Presumably even the most ardent greenie doesn\'t think that would
be a good idea.

Most of the ice age periods can be traced back to some unbelievably huge catastrophic event that influences and disrupts the distribution of heat by ocean currents.

The equilibrium emission/ absorption by plant life alone is estimated to be 700 Gt annually, of which mankind\'s 30 Gt is but a fraction. As small as it may be, mankind\'s emission are forcing a new equilibrium at higher temperature, that is making the planet uninhabitable. There are other natural sources of sequestration on land and water, which dwarf mankind\'s perturbation, but it\'s not enough apparently. No one is saying the Earth wouldn\'t get hot without GHG, of course it will, but the equilibrium is stable, life has adapted, and it can be dealt with. Mankind is moving the planet to a new equilibrium which won\'t be dealt with easily, even by nature..

https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/carbontracker/

The problem, to the extent that one exists, is not that carbon dioxide
is being emitted, but that more is being emitted than was emitted in the
past, and the videos cannot show that.

Sylvia.