B
BretCahill
Guest
What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Surface brightness. Due to limited phosphor lifetime, you can't make a fluorescentWhat is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
....Although a HID flashlight does exist :BretCahill wrote:
What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
Surface brightness. Due to limited phosphor lifetime, you can't make a fluorescent
tube with anything like the surface brightness of a tungsten filament. The large
diffuse radiating surface means that you can't get any sort of beam from such a
bulb. Stick a couple of layers of Magic Invisible Tape on the bulb of an ordinary
flashlight to get an idea of what this does.
LEDS are a much better bet.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
Right, arc lamps have much higher surface brightness than tungsten, even....Although a HID flashlight does exist :
http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/lc100.htm
Short length and small diameter seem toMessage-id: <slrnbn4duo.mmn.don@manx.misty.com> writes:
In article <20030924130115.03086.00000143@mb-m07.aol.com>, BretCahill wrote:
What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
Three problems:
There isn't any way to increase the surface3. . . . a limitation on how much UV the
mercury can produce. You cannot exceed the same amount of UV in that
spectral feature's bandwidth radiated by the same area of radiating
surface
Why not use a really big reflector -- aboutSo you cannot get fluorescent lamps with the
surface brightness of incandescents, LED chips, etc.
Three problems:What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
No, it really is a surface issue. There's no problem building _very_Short length and small diameter seem to
be just one problem: a lot of volume is
required for efficient flourescent lights.
The area isn't the issue--it's the surface brightness in lumens/square3. . . . a limitation on how much UV the
mercury can produce. You cannot exceed the same amount of UV in that
spectral feature's bandwidth radiated by the same area of radiating
surface
There isn't any way to increase the surface
area?
So you cannot get fluorescent lamps with the
surface brightness of incandescents, LED chips, etc.
Why not use a really big reflector -- about
8 - 10 inches in diameter?
One problem is that they don't put out much light at temps nearWhat is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
--Bret Cahill
Much better bet for what?BretCahill wrote:
What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
Surface brightness. Due to limited phosphor lifetime, you can't make a fluorescent
tube with anything like the surface brightness of a tungsten filament. The large
diffuse radiating surface means that you can't get any sort of beam from such a
bulb. Stick a couple of layers of Magic Invisible Tape on the bulb of an ordinary
flashlight to get an idea of what this does.
LEDS are a much better bet.
--Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
"Watson A.Name - Watt Sun" wrote ...BretCahill wrote:
....
LEDS are a much better bet.
Light production for a given size.Much better bet for what?
Well, where's the light going to go? Right back into its own surfacedon@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) in
Message-id: <slrnbn4duo.mmn.don@manx.misty.com> writes:
In article <20030924130115.03086.00000143@mb-m07.aol.com>, BretCahill wrote:
What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
Three problems:
Short length and small diameter seem to
be just one problem: a lot of volume is
required for efficient flourescent lights.
3. . . . a limitation on how much UV the
mercury can produce. You cannot exceed the same amount of UV in that
spectral feature's bandwidth radiated by the same area of radiating
surface
There isn't any way to increase the surface
area?
So you cannot get fluorescent lamps with the
surface brightness of incandescents, LED chips, etc.
Why not use a really big reflector -- about
8 - 10 inches in diameter?
Bret Cahill
.. . .Message-id: <MPG.19dc291197f12c14989703@news.dslextreme.com> writes:
In article <20030924210726.27155.00000134@mb-m03.aol.com>,
bretcahill@aol.com mentioned...
Ooops. Spent too much time in heat andThere isn't any way to increase the surface
area?
Well, where's the light going to go?
Use lenses or reflectors to get the lightRight back into its own surface
and be dissipated as heat?
They're not any better efficiency than halogen bulbs, which are muchBretCahill wrote:
...
LEDS are a much better bet.
"Watson A.Name - Watt Sun" wrote ...
Much better bet for what?
Light production for a given size.
Ooh, charcoal! Now the trend is to deep fry the turkey outside inThe way a flourescent light works is very obvious
once you strip off the phosphor layer inside the bulb.
You then have what was very common in head shops and nightclubs years ago
--a black light.
The ultraviolet light produced by the mercury-vapor lamp
is absorbed by the phosphors and re-radiated as visible light.
The phosphors can only absorb so much energy without being destroyed.
That's kinda like trying to cook a turkey at 650 degrees for 2 hours
instead of 325 degrees for 4 hours.
I was over at the Big Orange Box store the other day and thought aboutWatson A.Name - "Watt Sun" <alondra101@hotmail.com> in
Message-id: <MPG.19dc291197f12c14989703@news.dslextreme.com> writes:
In article <20030924210726.27155.00000134@mb-m03.aol.com>,
bretcahill@aol.com mentioned...
. . .
There isn't any way to increase the surface
area?
Well, where's the light going to go?
Ooops. Spent too much time in heat and
momentum transfer & forgot all about
fields.
Pretty funny now that I think about it.
Right back into its own surface
and be dissipated as heat?
Use lenses or reflectors to get the light
around the curved or pleated surfaces and
away from the tube.
I don't immediately see what would
preclude that or other tactics.
Bret Cahill
But aren't they more rugged and long-lasting?In article <vn4tboa9o585d7@corp.supernews.com>, rcrowley7@xprt.net
mentioned...
BretCahill wrote:
...
LEDS are a much better bet.
"Watson A.Name - Watt Sun" wrote ...
Much better bet for what?
Light production for a given size.
They're not any better efficiency than halogen bulbs, which are much
_less_ efficient than fluorescent lights. See Don Klipstein's LED
pages for more info on this. http://members.misty.com/don/ledx.html
.. . .Message-id: <MPG.19dc460f6f8e4425989708@news.dslextreme.com> writes:
In article <f8b945bc.0309242359.5a2819ca@posting.google.com>,
jeffm_@email.com mentioned...
In politics that's call "good reasoning."That's kinda like trying to cook a turkey at 650 degrees for 2 hours
instead of 325 degrees for 4 hours.
They couldn't justify using that muchOoh, charcoal! Now the trend is to deep fry the turkey outside in
only an hour or so. Why didn't someone think of that low tech
solution years ago?
Cost is a big factor, too. Perhaps the biggest factor. And LEDs are"Watson A.Name - Watt Sun" <alondra101@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.19dc44894700ee48989706@news.dslextreme.com...
In article <vn4tboa9o585d7@corp.supernews.com>, rcrowley7@xprt.net
mentioned...
BretCahill wrote:
...
LEDS are a much better bet.
"Watson A.Name - Watt Sun" wrote ...
Much better bet for what?
Light production for a given size.
They're not any better efficiency than halogen bulbs, which are much
_less_ efficient than fluorescent lights. See Don Klipstein's LED
pages for more info on this. http://members.misty.com/don/ledx.html
But aren't they more rugged and long-lasting?
don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) in
Message-id: <slrnbn4duo.mmn.don@manx.misty.com> writes:
In article <20030924130115.03086.00000143@mb-m07.aol.com>, BretCahill
wrote:
What is the basic problem in making compact flouercent flashlight bulbs?
Three problems:
Short length and small diameter seem to
be just one problem: a lot of volume is
required for efficient flourescent lights.
3. . . . a limitation on how much UV the
mercury can produce. You cannot exceed the same amount of UV in that
spectral feature's bandwidth radiated by the same area of radiating
surface
There isn't any way to increase the surface
area?
So you cannot get fluorescent lamps with the
surface brightness of incandescents, LED chips, etc.
Why not use a really big reflector -- about
8 - 10 inches in diameter?
Bret Cahill