Rydberg Atoms

[Clifford Heath]

I thought this might generate some interesting discussion.
Speff, are you there

<https://www.army.mil/article/212935>

Clifford Heath

 

[Winfield Hill]

Clifford Heath wrote...

https://www.army.mil/article/212935

Bah, humbug.


--
Thanks,
- Win

 

Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:r56g9301jdn@drn.newsguy.com:

Clifford Heath wrote...

https://www.army.mil/article/212935

Bah, humbug.

Fusion reactors are only ten years off... man.

Hey, I know... we can make better neutrino detectors with them.

 

[whit3rd]

On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 2:23:55 PM UTC-7, Clifford Heath wrote:

I thought this might generate some interesting discussion.

https://www.army.mil/article/212935

Yeah, it's a great detector scheme, but it takes multiple (pump
and trap) lasers, a magnet structure, and the 'sensitivity' improvement
just means you can pull in static and signals from such range as means
they aren't local info at all.

It's not a tactical info resource, more of a curiosity; the astronomers, though,
will have a LOT of interest, I suspect.

When the bad guys are using the same cellphones as millions of innocent civilians,
it's not really useful to detect/monitor all the traffic being broadcast...

 

[George Herold]

On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 5:23:55 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:

I thought this might generate some interesting discussion.
Speff, are you there

https://www.army.mil/article/212935

Clifford Heath

Hmm a little thin on details.
There is some here from a link.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.03545.pdf
(I only read the beginning bits.)

George H.