J
Joel Kolstad
Guest
I've done some reading lately (in the likes of Proakis, Lathai, etc.), and
they all discuss the use of raised cosine, root raised cosine, or similar
"pulse" signals that occupy approximately constant bandwidths, are designed to
largely eliminate ISI, etc. That's great. However, this is usually all in
the context of digital (or at least discrete time) systems. Is anyone
familiar with how you might go about building a matched filter for, say, a
root raised cosine (RRC) pulse using traditional (continuous time) filtering?
(The digital case is rather trivial! ) I can see that, if one were to
just build a relatively low order bandpass filter (say, just a Butterworth
filter), the result probably wouldn't be _that_ far from the mark, but I
imagine there's a somewhat more systematic way to do this?
Thanks,
---Joel Kolstad
they all discuss the use of raised cosine, root raised cosine, or similar
"pulse" signals that occupy approximately constant bandwidths, are designed to
largely eliminate ISI, etc. That's great. However, this is usually all in
the context of digital (or at least discrete time) systems. Is anyone
familiar with how you might go about building a matched filter for, say, a
root raised cosine (RRC) pulse using traditional (continuous time) filtering?
(The digital case is rather trivial! ) I can see that, if one were to
just build a relatively low order bandpass filter (say, just a Butterworth
filter), the result probably wouldn't be _that_ far from the mark, but I
imagine there's a somewhat more systematic way to do this?
Thanks,
---Joel Kolstad