K
kk
Guest
what does -RELAX option do in ncvhdl. are the designs compiled with and
without the option set incompatible.
thanks in adv.
without the option set incompatible.
thanks in adv.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
A
Ajeetha
Guest
Read NC's document on this. I wonder why youy didn't do that before
posting!
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
www.systemverilog.us
kk wrote:
posting!
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
www.systemverilog.us
kk wrote:
what does -RELAX option do in ncvhdl. are the designs compiled with and
without the option set incompatible.
thanks in adv.
K
kk
Guest
Thanks for the *novel* suggestion. I posted this only because i didnt
had the access to NC's documents at that time and i couldn't find that
in the net too. Anyways i got the answer now.
Ajeetha wrote:
had the access to NC's documents at that time and i couldn't find that
in the net too. Anyways i got the answer now.
Ajeetha wrote:
Read NC's document on this. I wonder why youy didn't do that before
posting!
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
www.systemverilog.us
kk wrote:
what does -RELAX option do in ncvhdl. are the designs compiled with and
without the option set incompatible.
thanks in adv.
A
Ajeetha
Guest
Hi KK,
Leaving sarcasticism aside, here is some rationale behind that
*novel* suggestion.
1. Many vendors support such "relax"/"extended LRM" implementation of
VHDL - guess b'cos of VHDL's rigidness. (No I'm not against any
specific language, just my guess on why these options exist: -relax in
NC, -xlrm in VCSMX etc.)
2. So what goes under "relax" is heavily customer (and vendor)
dependent and hence is expected to change across releases - I don't
work for an EDA vendor, hence can't get more specific than this.
3. Now you would have realized (after reading their manual) that this
-relax indeed has several relaxations - sometimes too many to be posted
here for easy digestion.
4. Lastly, google search for "ncvhdl -relax" did reveal NC's document
on web.
Anyway, I neither intend to sound arrogant, nor apologetic.
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
kk wrote:
Leaving sarcasticism aside, here is some rationale behind that
*novel* suggestion.
1. Many vendors support such "relax"/"extended LRM" implementation of
VHDL - guess b'cos of VHDL's rigidness. (No I'm not against any
specific language, just my guess on why these options exist: -relax in
NC, -xlrm in VCSMX etc.)
2. So what goes under "relax" is heavily customer (and vendor)
dependent and hence is expected to change across releases - I don't
work for an EDA vendor, hence can't get more specific than this.
3. Now you would have realized (after reading their manual) that this
-relax indeed has several relaxations - sometimes too many to be posted
here for easy digestion.
4. Lastly, google search for "ncvhdl -relax" did reveal NC's document
on web.
Anyway, I neither intend to sound arrogant, nor apologetic.
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
kk wrote:
Thanks for the *novel* suggestion. I posted this only because i didnt
had the access to NC's documents at that time and i couldn't find that
in the net too. Anyways i got the answer now.
Ajeetha wrote:
Read NC's document on this. I wonder why youy didn't do that before
posting!
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
www.systemverilog.us
kk wrote:
what does -RELAX option do in ncvhdl. are the designs compiled with and
without the option set incompatible.
thanks in adv.