Recent spam via AIOE

D

David Nebenzahl

Guest
All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
 
David Nebenzahl wrote:
All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.
Click to expand...
Forward copies of ALL THE HEADERS to abuse@aioe.org.
Perhaps they can block his/her IP address.
 
David Nebenzahl wrote:

All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.
Click to expand...
Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For that reason,
they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is why I have plocked all
posts from aioe.
 
On 6/11/2010 9:11 PM UCLAN spake thus:

David Nebenzahl wrote:

All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.

Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For that reason,
they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is why I have plocked all
posts from aioe.
Click to expand...
"Plocked"; I like it. Plonked + blocked.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
 
In article <PNDQn.57036$h57.24297@newsfe22.iad>,
UCLAN <nomail@thanks.org> wrote:
All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.

Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For that
reason, they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is why I have
plocked all posts from aioe.
Click to expand...
You'd do better to block all gmail posts - that's where the majority
originate.

--
*Oh, what a tangled website we weave when first we practice *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:09:24 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <PNDQn.57036$h57.24297@newsfe22.iad>,
UCLAN <nomail@thanks.org> wrote:
All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.

Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For that
reason, they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is why I have
plocked all posts from aioe.

You'd do better to block all gmail posts - that's where the majority
originate.
Click to expand...
When I blocked all gmail posts my spam counts dropped by about 85% or
more. Every once in a while I miss a useful post, but usually someone
will reply and quote the original post and I will see it.
 
In article <q1u61652sijrrtst0af3rgs1tu4gr2m4i9@4ax.com>,
PeterD <peter2@hipson.net> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:09:24 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <PNDQn.57036$h57.24297@newsfe22.iad>,
UCLAN <nomail@thanks.org> wrote:
All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.

Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For that
reason, they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is why I have
plocked all posts from aioe.

You'd do better to block all gmail posts - that's where the majority
originate.

When I blocked all gmail posts my spam counts dropped by about 85% or
more. Every once in a while I miss a useful post, but usually someone
will reply and quote the original post and I will see it.
Click to expand...
gmail isn't the problem, it's googlegroups. The fact that some
googlegroupers have gmail email accounts has nothing to do with it.
Filtering Message ID for "googlegroups" targets the spam much more
accurately.
 
Smitty Two Inscribed thus:

In article <q1u61652sijrrtst0af3rgs1tu4gr2m4i9@4ax.com>,
PeterD <peter2@hipson.net> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:09:24 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <PNDQn.57036$h57.24297@newsfe22.iad>,
UCLAN <nomail@thanks.org> wrote:
All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through
aioe.org.

Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For
that reason, they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is
why I have plocked all posts from aioe.

You'd do better to block all gmail posts - that's where the majority
originate.

When I blocked all gmail posts my spam counts dropped by about 85% or
more. Every once in a while I miss a useful post, but usually someone
will reply and quote the original post and I will see it.

gmail isn't the problem, it's googlegroups. The fact that some
googlegroupers have gmail email accounts has nothing to do with it.
Filtering Message ID for "googlegroups" targets the spam much more
accurately.
Click to expand...
They don't mind forging headers either...

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
 
On 6/12/2010 7:35 AM Smitty Two spake thus:

In article <q1u61652sijrrtst0af3rgs1tu4gr2m4i9@4ax.com>,
PeterD <peter2@hipson.net> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:09:24 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <PNDQn.57036$h57.24297@newsfe22.iad>,
UCLAN <nomail@thanks.org> wrote:

All the recent spam here seems to have been posted through aioe.org.

Aioe.org does nothing to stop spammers and nonsense posters. For that
reason, they are quite popular with spammers, etc. That is why I have
plocked all posts from aioe.

You'd do better to block all gmail posts - that's where the
majority originate.

When I blocked all gmail posts my spam counts dropped by about 85% or
more. Every once in a while I miss a useful post, but usually someone
will reply and quote the original post and I will see it.

gmail isn't the problem, it's googlegroups. The fact that some
googlegroupers have gmail email accounts has nothing to do with it.
Filtering Message ID for "googlegroups" targets the spam much more
accurately.
Click to expand...
However, in the case of the spam being discussed here, *neither*
blocking Google Groups nor gmail would have any effect, as this
particular asshole is posting through aioe.org and *not* using gmail
addresses.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
 
On 6/12/2010 3:04 PM Meat Plow spake thus:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:35:17 -0700, David Nebenzahl ǝʇoɹʍ:

However, in the case of the spam being discussed here, *neither*
blocking Google Groups nor gmail would have any effect, as this
particular asshole is posting through aioe.org and *not* using gmail
addresses.

[~null]
Score:: =-9999
From: ^<*@aoie\.org>$
%EOS

End of spam (from aioe)
Click to expand...
You're telling us that aioe.org responded to your complaint and pulled
their plug? If so, mazeltov.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
 
On 6/12/2010 3:04 PM Meat Plow spake thus:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:35:17 -0700, David Nebenzahl ǝʇoɹʍ:

However, in the case of the spam being discussed here, *neither*
blocking Google Groups nor gmail would have any effect, as this
particular asshole is posting through aioe.org and *not* using gmail
addresses.

[~null]
Score:: =-9999
From: ^<*@aoie\.org>$
%EOS

End of spam (from aioe)
Click to expand...
I responded too soon. All you did was killfile all aioe.org posts. Big deal.

I'm not one of those who advocates viewing Usenet through
killfile-colored glasses: the spam and other shit is still here. You're
just pretending it isn't.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
 
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:35:17 -0700, David Nebenzahl ǝʇoɹʍ:

However, in the case of the spam being discussed here, *neither*
blocking Google Groups nor gmail would have any effect, as this
particular asshole is posting through aioe.org and *not* using gmail
addresses.
Click to expand...
[~null]
Score:: =-9999
From: ^<*@aoie\.org>$
%EOS

End of spam (from aioe)
 
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:57:11 -0700, David Nebenzahl ǝʇoɹʍ:

On 6/12/2010 3:04 PM Meat Plow spake thus:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:35:17 -0700, David Nebenzahl ǝʇoɹʍ:

However, in the case of the spam being discussed here, *neither*
blocking Google Groups nor gmail would have any effect, as this
particular asshole is posting through aioe.org and *not* using gmail
addresses.

[~null]
Score:: =-9999
From: ^<*@aoie\.org>$
%EOS

End of spam (from aioe)

I responded too soon. All you did was killfile all aioe.org posts. Big
deal.

I'm not one of those who advocates viewing Usenet through
killfile-colored glasses: the spam and other shit is still here. You're
just pretending it isn't.
Click to expand...
Do as you wish Dave. Someone did forge my yahoo email address in a post
here just within the hour and I fired off a complaint. we'll see how that
goes...heh. I doubt if they will respond. As far as kill files go I think
they are useful. Pan scores -9999 but still shows the posts exist in the
Group Pane tab. You can select to match articles with a score of -9999
and disable the scoring for all entries. I usually do that until the spam
gets heavy muddying the waters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top