Questions about dimagnetic -- *not* diAmagnetic -- strength

[Autymn D. C.]

On Dec 3, 10:10 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:49:23 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2:02 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:
No use arguing with Autymn - he is a legend in his own mind. Note that he is

/what/ he?!, you Irish dumbass!

usually self referent on the basis that since he said it, it is credible
and everyone else must be stupid because they don't accept his statements.

http://google.com/groups?q=cold-fusion-news-and-more
http://google.com/groups?q=Bzzt+Uncle-Al

My proofs are open for criticism. None can show any, howsoever.

What "proofs?"

It seems to me that all you do is postulate idiocy and then ask for
unsophisticated followers to join you in your descent into the
abyss.

But you're a retard, so what youseems is junk. My posts are
descriptive and predictive and belihtenned. Some proofs are as easy
as arithmetic.

As to the language- it is hard to tell whether it is intentional obscurity
or simply an asinine personal hangup. Note also that he is always willing to
call others stupid- is it to bolster his own ego.

hangup after many breakdowns

---
Elaborate?

There's a big gap in my postings at Google Groups, which you can see
in my profile. Over that time I was away from the computer and had a
flood of intellectual, academic, and linguistic revelations, my twoth,
all the while I could hear and read thas almost everything these
muttish-speakkrs said was wrong, illiterate, and mangled beyond
sanity. English has been dead for over 1000 years; you know nothing
about English, so whas you call wrong of me is wriht and whas wriht of
you is wrong. But there's no time for me to go over everything I'v
learnned.

-Aut

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:51:19 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
<lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Dec 3, 9:21 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:46:09 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 30, 6:26 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Learn to read.

Learn to write.

You. I can read and write English,

You might like to think you can but, at best, your English is clumsy
and is cluttered with constructs which you think should be English,
but aren't.

where? It's not clumsier than what everyone uses.

---
Please...

Look at your, "what ye spell and what ye speak isn't the same.",
below, and if you have one whit of intelligence you should realize
that the use of 'ye' has mutated to "y'all", rendering your usage
dated as well as clumsy.
---

Latin, Witalian, Francish,
Spannish, Thewdish, Hellčnic, Russcij, and some Hibiru. You onely
read and write muttish.

In American English, your "Spannish" is spelled "Spanish", pero sin
tu eres una piruja la unica cosa que te interesa es pelear, no?

In other words, in American muttish, what ye spell and what ye speak
isn't the same. It's not my fault.

---
_Your_ fault?

What on Earth, you conceited cunt, makes you think you have anything
to do with it?

It seems to me like what you want to do is to take the wonderful,
subtle nuance available out of American English and make it sterile,
like Latin, with no room to grow.

Typical of a control freak who wants to bend everything to her will.


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:03:08 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
<lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Dec 3, 10:10 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:49:23 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2:02 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:
No use arguing with Autymn - he is a legend in his own mind. Note that he is

/what/ he?!, you Irish dumbass!

usually self referent on the basis that since he said it, it is credible
and everyone else must be stupid because they don't accept his statements.

http://google.com/groups?q=cold-fusion-news-and-more
http://google.com/groups?q=Bzzt+Uncle-Al

My proofs are open for criticism. None can show any, howsoever.

What "proofs?"

It seems to me that all you do is postulate idiocy and then ask for
unsophisticated followers to join you in your descent into the
abyss.

But you're a retard, so what youseems is junk. My posts are
descriptive and predictive and belihtenned. Some proofs are as easy
as arithmetic.

---
If your arithmetic is as mangled as your English, then I suppose you
and your money have long ago parted company.
---

There's a big gap in my postings at Google Groups, which you can see
in my profile.

---
There's also a big gap between your ears.
---

Over that time I was away from the computer and had a
flood of intellectual, academic, and linguistic revelations, my twoth,
all the while I could hear and read thas almost everything these
muttish-speakkrs said was wrong, illiterate, and mangled beyond
sanity. English has been dead for over 1000 years; you know nothing
about English, so whas you call wrong of me is wriht and whas wriht of
you is wrong. But there's no time for me to go over everything I'v
learnned.

---
A femtosecond isn't quite _no_ time, but I think it would serve the
purpose admirably, with time left over.


--
JF

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Dec 6, 5:20 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:03:08 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Dec 3, 10:10 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:49:23 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2:02 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:
No use arguing with Autymn - he is a legend in his own mind. Note that he is

/what/ he?!, you Irish dumbass!

usually self referent on the basis that since he said it, it is credible
and everyone else must be stupid because they don't accept his statements.

http://google.com/groups?q=cold-fusion-news-and-more
http://google.com/groups?q=Bzzt+Uncle-Al

My proofs are open for criticism. None can show any, howsoever.

What "proofs?"

It seems to me that all you do is postulate idiocy and then ask for
unsophisticated followers to join you in your descent into the
abyss.

But you're a retard, so what youseems is junk. My posts are
descriptive and predictive and belihtenned. Some proofs are as easy
as arithmetic.
If your arithmetic is as mangled as your English, then I suppose you
and your money have long ago parted company.

Neither is mangled, shithead.

There's a big gap in my postings at Google Groups, which you can see
in my profile.
There's also a big gap between your ears.

Don't flood newsgroups with your delusions.

A femtosecond isn't quite _no_ time, but I think it would serve the
purpose admirably, with time left over.

I'v a lead ball with the future imprint of your worthles skull.

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Dec 5, 5:23 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:51:19 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Dec 3, 9:21 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:46:09 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 30, 6:26 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Learn to read.

Learn to write.

You. I can read and write English,

You might like to think you can but, at best, your English is clumsy
and is cluttered with constructs which you think should be English,
but aren't.

where? It's not clumsier than what everyone uses.

Please...

You didn't say where.

Look at your, "what ye spell and what ye speak isn't the same.",
below, and if you have one whit of intelligence you should realize
that the use of 'ye' has mutated to "y'all", rendering your usage
dated as well as clumsy.

One whit of intelligense is useles; it's all you hav, which is why you
think "y'all" is okay.

Latin, Witalian, Francish,
Spannish, Thewdish, Hellčnic, Russcij, and some Hibiru. You onely
read and write muttish.

In American English, your "Spannish" is spelled "Spanish", pero sin
tu eres una piruja la unica cosa que te interesa es pelear, no?

In other words, in American muttish, what ye spell and what ye speak
isn't the same. It's not my fault.

---
_Your_ fault?

What on Earth, you conceited cunt, makes you think you have anything
to do with it?

with my own spelling

It seems to me like what you want to do is to take the wonderful,
subtle nuance available out of American English and make it sterile,
like Latin, with no room to grow.

Typical of a control freak who wants to bend everything to her will.

What about English? There is almost no English. What you speak is
muttish, with no regard to rules or grammar or fňnetics. Latin has
plenty of room to grow: It's called New Latin, or Romani. (However,
scientific New Latin isn't the same; they make muttly words all the
time.)

Why don't you compar the size of a English dictionary 1000 years ago
with one today after you take out all the words thas aren't English.
You are happy with backward growth as you a clueles cretin who can't
even tell between fine fitts of speech.

What does this mean?: "killing bears"

Is "killing" a noun, a verb progressive, a verb infinitive, a
adjectiv, a verb subjunctive? active or passive vox?

Is "bears" a noun, a verb indicative, a verb allative? subject or
object?

You're too fucken retarded to tell, and it's the fault of nitwits lik
you thas English is in the trashdump today, toyear, for the last 1000
years.

-Aut

 

[Benj]

On Dec 5, 5:51 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In other words, in American muttish, what ye spell and what ye speak
isn't the same. It's not my fault.

Actually not your fault but the fault of the fact that "American
muttish" is a collection of expressions from a variety of languages
and an inadequate alphabet. I have long been an advocate of using the
standard "pronunciation" alphabet found in most dictionaries as the
standard spelling for Muttish English. Regional accents and words with
multiple pronunciations would have to be standardized but the problem
of adopting foreign words WITH the foreign spelling would be fixed.

You know, Autymn, sometimes you ALMOST make sense!

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Dec 6, 10:47 pm, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:

On Dec 5, 5:51 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In other words, in American muttish, what ye spell and what ye speak
isn't the same. It's not my fault.

Actually not your fault but the fault of the fact that "American
muttish" is a collection of expressions from a variety of languages
and an inadequate alphabet. I have long been an advocate of using the
standard "pronunciation" alphabet found in most dictionaries as the
standard spelling for Muttish English. Regional accents and words with
multiple pronunciations would have to be standardized but the problem
of adopting foreign words WITH the foreign spelling would be fixed.

You know, Autymn, sometimes you ALMOST make sense!

Which is the "pronunciation alphabet"? The one by IPA? (No, that's
not even English but Latinago.) The one with macrons, breves, and
circumflices? The one with lowercase and uppercase vowels? (rare, so
likely not) Or do you mean that retarded guide thas uses fitts of
words such as poe-tay-toh, when these sounds don't even match up
literatim?

-Aut

 

[Benj]

On Dec 7, 4:41 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Which is the "pronunciation alphabet"? The one by IPA? (No, that's
not even English but Latinago.) The one with macrons, breves, and
circumflices? The one with lowercase and uppercase vowels? (rare, so
likely not) Or do you mean that retarded guide thas uses fitts of
words such as poe-tay-toh, when these sounds don't even match up
literatim?

I prefer the one you usually find with the accents and other symbols
giving pronunciation. But you are allowed to pick one you like. I
presume you haven't been inside a dictionary for quite some time and
therefore have no idea what a pronunciation guide looks like.

But I do have to note that one reason that Americans all look like
dolts to the rest of the world is because we adopt foreign words into
our "muttish" but we use the foreign spelling which of course has a
DIFFERENT pronunciation in the foreign language than it does in
English (muttish). Hence "ugly Americans" all go around saying dumb
things like Pair- iss for the French city instead of the correct Pah-
ree.

PS. There is SOME progress in the world in this regard through the
introduction of the English phonetic standardization of Chinese
spelling. We no longer have to put up with things like "Peking"
instead of Beijing.

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Dec 7, 9:41 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:

On Dec 7, 4:41 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Which is the "pronunciation alphabet"? The one by IPA? (No, that's
not even English but Latinago.) The one with macrons, breves, and
circumflices? The one with lowercase and uppercase vowels? (rare, so
likely not) Or do you mean that retarded guide thas uses fitts of
words such as poe-tay-toh, when these sounds don't even match up
literatim?

I prefer the one you usually find with the accents and other symbols
giving pronunciation. But you are allowed to pick one you like. I
presume you haven't been inside a dictionary for quite some time and
therefore have no idea what a pronunciation guide looks like.

Why would you presum such? I read dictionaries, paper and online, all
the time. But their pronunciation guides are inconsistent, many,
retarded, and outwriht wrong. Mine is better:
http://google.com/search?q=site:wiki.answers.com+etincelle.

But I do have to note that one reason that Americans all look like
dolts to the rest of the world is because we adopt foreign words into
our "muttish" but we use the foreign spelling which of course has a
DIFFERENT pronunciation in the foreign language than it does in
English (muttish). Hence "ugly Americans" all go around saying dumb
things like Pair- iss for the French city instead of the correct Pah-
ree.

No, Americans say Pčryss|Periss. You don't even know what sound ai
is. Paris|Parese is correct. Neither Commonwealts nor Francs are
correct.

PS. There is SOME progress in the world in this regard through the
introduction of the English phonetic standardization of Chinese
spelling. We no longer have to put up with things like "Peking"
instead of Beijing.

What are you a'talking about? The "e" and "i" in Beijing is not
English but Latin. The "i" in Beijing isn't even a i any more, but
becomes the mutant ei which sounds up yester a n or ng: Note the shift
between kin and king, sin and sink, etc. The English spelling of
Beijing would be Baeejeeng.

-Aut

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Nov 30, 6:26 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Learn to read.

Learn to write.

You. I can read and write English, Latin, Witalian, Francish,
Spannish, Thewdish, Hellčnic, Russcij, and some Hibiru. You onely
read and write muttish.

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Nov 30, 2:02 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:

No use arguing with Autymn - he is a legend in his own mind. Note that he is

/what/ he?!, you Irish dumbass!

usually self referent on the basis that since he said it, it is credible
and everyone else must be stupid because they don't accept his statements.

http://google.com/groups?q=cold-fusion-news-and-more
http://google.com/groups?q=Bzzt+Uncle-Al

My proofs are open for criticism. None can show any, howsoever.

As to the language- it is hard to tell whether it is intentional obscurity
or simply an asinine personal hangup. Note also that he is always willing to
call others stupid- is it to bolster his own ego.

hangup after many breakdowns

 

[Autymn D. C.]

On Nov 30, 11:17 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:

On Nov 30, 4:16 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

di- -> dia-

Go tell it to Radium!

not /all/

"breakdown" is a "short" so you tell me how much of /all/ a magnetic
"short" is.
For that matter you tell me just WHAT a "magentic short" is?

For a elčctric conductor, the medium is in the conductional band which
is over each atom or molecul. For a magnetic conductor, it's at the
same for soft materials, but ends at cellular [polar] domains for hard
materials. Diaelčctrets break down at cellular [polar] domains as
well, but undergo redox, whereas diamagnets undergo reconjugation.
Why don't you see what happens when you wrest a rare earth magnet's
field the other way? The BH plot will tell you its remanense, and the
magnet's weaker therefrom.

-Aut

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:46:09 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
<lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Nov 30, 6:26 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Learn to read.

Learn to write.

You. I can read and write English,

---
You might like to think you can but, at best, your English is clumsy
and is cluttered with constructs which you think should be English,
but aren't.
---

Latin, Witalian, Francish,
Spannish, Thewdish, Hellčnic, Russcij, and some Hibiru. You onely
read and write muttish.

---
In American English, your "Spannish" is spelled "Spanish", pero sin
tu eres una piruja la unica cosa que te interesa es pelear, no?


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:49:23 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C."
<lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Nov 30, 2:02 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:
No use arguing with Autymn - he is a legend in his own mind. Note that he is

/what/ he?!, you Irish dumbass!

usually self referent on the basis that since he said it, it is credible
and everyone else must be stupid because they don't accept his statements.

http://google.com/groups?q=cold-fusion-news-and-more
http://google.com/groups?q=Bzzt+Uncle-Al

My proofs are open for criticism. None can show any, howsoever.

---
What "proofs?"

It seems to me that all you do is postulate idiocy and then ask for
unsophisticated followers to join you in your descent into the
abyss.
---

As to the language- it is hard to tell whether it is intentional obscurity
or simply an asinine personal hangup. Note also that he is always willing to
call others stupid- is it to bolster his own ego.

hangup after many breakdowns

---
Elaborate?


--
JF

 

[Benj]

On Dec 4, 12:21 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

You might like to think you can but, at best, your English is clumsy
and is cluttered with constructs which you think should be English,
but aren't.

Psssst! Hey John. Want to have some fun? Purposely spell the
possessive form "its" as "it's" in your muttish responses to Autymn
Womyn and see what happens! Tee hee!