power supply mods

H

H. Dixon

Guest
I've finished the standard "build yourself a adjustable power supply"
project and some small others. I was looking at this:
http://www.electronics-lab.com/projects/test/014/index.html

I'd like to try this and was wondering about actually adding it to the
power supply. The PS has two 24V center tapped transformers with the
primaries in parallel and the secondaries in series. Right now the
center taps are not used. Could I make use of the centers, couple of
resistors, add another bridge rectifier and supply the input for the
above voltmeter? It does require +-5 volts so I guess it would have to
resemble the schematic at the bottom where they use the 7805/7905 to
get the +-5V.

Just wondering if the above is a doable near future project.


TIA


H. Dixon
 
H. Dixon wrote:
I've finished the standard "build yourself a adjustable power supply"
project and some small others. I was looking at this:
http://www.electronics-lab.com/projects/test/014/index.html

I'd like to try this and was wondering about actually adding it to the
power supply. The PS has two 24V center tapped transformers with the
primaries in parallel and the secondaries in series. Right now the
center taps are not used. Could I make use of the centers, couple of
resistors, add another bridge rectifier and supply the input for the
above voltmeter? It does require +-5 volts so I guess it would have to
resemble the schematic at the bottom where they use the 7805/7905 to
get the +-5V.

Just wondering if the above is a doable near future project.
I'm pretty sure you will need an isolated supply for this
kit, in order to use it to measure a voltage referenced to
the negative side of your regulates supply.
The kit gives few detail,s, but the data sheet for the chip:
http://www.intersil.com/data/fn/fn3082.pdf
Gives more. It appears that the input common of the chip
(pin 32) is biased to some voltage between the supply rails.
So the supply voltages must center themselves around the
voltage being measured.

I suggest you get another small transformer, say, a 12 volt
center tapped .3 amp transformer and use a bridge rectifier
and the center tap to produce a raw + and - 7 volt supplies
that you regulate to + and - 5 volts @ 200mA with 7805 and
7905 regulators. Then you can connect the digital meter to
whatever you want to measure without worry that there will
be a supply conflict.

--
Regards,

John Popelish
 
Phil Allison wrote:
"H. Dixon"
I've finished the standard "build yourself a adjustable power supply"
project and some small others. I was looking at this:
http://www.electronics-lab.com/projects/test/014/index.html
(snip)

** Beware - the " Sample Power supply 1 " schem will simply not work.
It might, if the positive and negative supply currents vary
only a small fraction of the total current if the LED
current passes through both regulators. But I can't see how
the LED current returns to the negative supply at all.

The data sheet:
http://www.intersil.com/data/fn/fn3082.pdf
shows the digital ground (the negative rail for the LED
switches) connecting to pin 27 but the schematic shows pin
27 connected only to a capacitor. And this is what is shown
on the data sheet as a typical ICL7107 design. WTF? How
does the current dumped by the segment drivers into digital
ground return to any supply?

Found it on page 5:
"• ICL7107 POWER SUPPLY: DUAL ą5.0V
V+ = +5V to GND
V- = -5V to GND
Digital Logic and LED driver supply V+ to GND"

But GND is pin 21, which is the common between the positive
and negative supplies, so the LED current is drawn only
through the +5 volt regulator, not the -5, so you are
exactly right. It can't work. I'm trying to keep up. ;-)

--
Regards,

John Popelish
 
H. Dixon wrote:
--snip

Found it on page 5:
"• ICL7107 POWER SUPPLY: DUAL ą5.0V
V+ = +5V to GND
V- = -5V to GND
Digital Logic and LED driver supply V+ to GND"

But GND is pin 21, which is the common between the positive
and negative supplies, so the LED current is drawn only
through the +5 volt regulator, not the -5, so you are
exactly right. It can't work. I'm trying to keep up. ;-)

--
Regards,

John Popelish

These display segments are common anode types - is that maybe why?
The problem involves the balance of current through the two
regulators. The simple 18 volt battery supply with two
regulators shown will work only of the two regulators see
almost identical load currents. This is because that is the
only way they will divide the 18 volt battery voltage in
half. If either draws more current, its half of the battery
voltage will collapse.

The meter circuit powers all the LEDs from the positive
supply (common anode), but returns that current to the
supply not through the -5 volt connection (that would
balance the regulator currents) but through the common
connection between the two regulators. so all that current
has to return to the battery through a 1k resistor, upstream
of the regulators, and that is not possible for the ~200
milliamperes and a 1k resistor, because that would require a
200 volt drop across the resistor, and only 18 is available.

If you replace the 18 volt battery with two 9 volt batteries
(or supplies) stacked in series, with the mid point of that
stack connected to the output common, then the LED current
comes from the plus 9 supply and returns to it through its
common connection, while the minus 9 volt supply carries
only the much smaller non LED chip current. That is why I
recommended building a supply derived from a 12 volt center
tapped secondary transformer. The center tap acts as that
mid point that separates the positive supply current from
the negative supply current.

--
Regards,

John Popelish
 
--snip

Found it on page 5:
"• ICL7107 POWER SUPPLY: DUAL ą5.0V
  V+ = +5V to GND
  V- = -5V to GND
  Digital Logic and LED driver supply V+ to GND"

But GND is pin 21, which is the common between the positive
and negative supplies, so the LED current is drawn only
through the +5 volt regulator, not the -5, so you are
exactly right.  It can't work.  I'm trying to keep up.  ;-)

--
Regards,

John Popelish
These display segments are common anode types - is that maybe why?

H. Dixon
 
On Aug 4, 12:15 pm, John Popelish <jpopel...@rica.net> wrote:
H. Dixon wrote:
--snip

Found it on page 5:
"• ICL7107 POWER SUPPLY: DUAL ą5.0V
  V+ = +5V to GND
  V- = -5V to GND
  Digital Logic and LED driver supply V+ to GND"

But GND is pin 21, which is the common between the positive
and negative supplies, so the LED current is drawn only
through the +5 volt regulator, not the -5, so you are
exactly right.  It can't work.  I'm trying to keep up.  ;-)

--
Regards,

John Popelish

These display segments are common anode types - is that maybe why?

The problem involves the balance of current through the two
regulators.  The simple 18 volt battery supply with two
regulators shown will work only of the two regulators see
almost identical load currents.  This is because that is the
only way they will divide the 18 volt battery voltage in
half.  If either draws more current, its half of the battery
voltage will collapse.

The meter circuit powers all the LEDs from the positive
supply (common anode), but returns that current to the
supply not through the -5 volt connection (that would
balance the regulator currents) but through the common
connection between the two regulators.  so all that current
has to return to the battery through a 1k resistor, upstream
of the regulators, and that is not possible for the ~200
milliamperes and a 1k resistor, because that would require a
200 volt drop across the resistor, and only 18 is available.

If you replace the 18 volt battery with two 9 volt batteries
(or supplies) stacked in series, with the mid point of that
stack connected to the output common, then the LED current
comes from the plus 9 supply and returns to it through its
common connection, while the minus 9 volt supply carries
only the much smaller non LED chip current.  That is why I
recommended building a supply derived from a 12 volt center
tapped secondary transformer.  The center tap acts as that
mid point that separates the positive supply current from
the negative supply current.

--
Regards,

John Popelish
Ok I "think" I understand. I'll go the separate transformer route.

Thank you.


H. Dixon
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top