OT: What are the chances of this getting through?

[Cursitor Doom]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-25/presidential-candidate-tulsi-
gabbard-co-sponsors-audit-fed-bill

Now that I'd like to see!



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

[bitrex]

On 7/26/19 8:36 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-25/presidential-candidate-tulsi-
gabbard-co-sponsors-audit-fed-bill

Now that I'd like to see!

Sounds like they're going with "the slimy Jew bankers are trying to
destroy our economy!!!" routine again.

This site has more dog-whistles than a 1976 Kroger's supermarket cereal
aisle full of Cap'n Crunch!

 

[bitrex]

On 7/26/19 8:36 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-25/presidential-candidate-tulsi-
gabbard-co-sponsors-audit-fed-bill

"Auditing the Fed is the first step in changing monetary policy that has
created a debt-and-bubble-based economy; promoted the welfare-warfare
state; created the most massive wealth inequality crisis in history; led
to an affordable housing crisis; transferred all the wealth to the top
1% of America, and could lead to the collapse of the American empire if
not corrected in the next several years."

So many Republican legislators are on board with this one it's almost
like they're worried people will figure out who the real culprits are lol

 

Sounds like they're going with "the slimy Jew bankers are trying to
destroy our economy!!!" routine again.

Not to stick up for them but they are not slimy. I know who and what they are and what they do and how they do it. They do what they are taught to do. They also do not want to destroy an economy, they want to exploit it.

They practically invented banking, something that is very beneneficial to trade and capitalism. However they never intended to do it for free. Like they take our military jets and make some really good modifications, and share SOME of them with us, but we gave them those for free anyway because of QME. They have advanced a few things for sure, but not for free.

The Rothschilds have been quiet, know why ? They got it made. Maybe they only have $100 billion laying around, when you are REALLY rich and REALLY know things money is junk. You can't eat it, you can't put it in your car and drive, your plane and fly or your boat and...whatever. So a hundred billion ? Bill Gates probably has that, but the Rothschilds have other assets. One of the most conservative estimates of their holdings was by Credit Suisse at $230 trillion. Yes, with a "T". Other estimates have been more, over twice that.

They have done some nasty things. They made a fortune lying about the outcome of the French revolution, buying valuable war bonds they convinced the holders were worthless for pence on the pound. They made enough money on that to buy the Bank Of England. Historical fact if you care to look it up. Bet that wasn't in your high school world history class.

And don't forget "Secret Weapons For Silent Wars". Written by one of "them", who apparently not only knew commerce but also electronics. He analogised the economy with an electronics circuit. It is brilliant. It is not economics 101 to say the least.

I bought it on paper. You cannot get the whole thing online. Most of it is there but it is missing a few of his hand written formulae.

The way he put it is that capacitance is like money in the bank. Resistance is costs, some unneeded and inductors are labor. This guy was sharp, I understood much of it, which few I know did because they do not have the right background for the analogies to be any good.

The original full version is copies of copies, literally. The "originals" which weren't almost for sure were found in the pan of a Xerox copier coming off lease.

You can call it any kind of conspiracy theory you want but the thing makes too much sense. Like the Protocols, people want to tel me how they are all crap and forgeries (of what ?) but don't say who forged it or why. Why ? To promote anti-Jewism ? Well for one they didn't really need it but still so many things in it are true, think about that.

People who really know consider the content before the source. And I mean "BEFORE" not "INSTEAD OF".

Anyway, Jews are alienated partly by their own ways. First of all clanish, separatists and even racists, openly. Here they live in Solon and that town was named after the word for "lawgiver". What does that tell you ? And it is east of the river where they like to be.

So they will find a community they like in a country in which they intend to stay for a while. Other places where they figure the pogrom might be coming of another Hitler they go to ghettos. Not put too much money into a place they are going to leave. I wouldn't.

They got themselves into a spot taking Palestine like that. You know if they like the desert we could give them a few places here... Maybe during the "holocaust" but the US refused. The holocaust had too much potential and is not one of their moneymakers.

I do not like how they are in general. I would prefer to do business on a friendly level. Not to have to remain sharp as a razor all the time. With my clients "So are you happy with that ?". With Jews I always have to be careful, on guard. I don't mind if the money is big enough but that is not likely to happen.

Hate ? I have no time for that, it is useless. Dislike, it happens. My family did what they do. My Uncle, I used to joke that he was our only Jewish Uncle. everything he touched turned to gold. I can handle Jews or whoever in business, he could handle me. That is saying something.

This guy, Polish and German, 6'6" with Coke bottles for glasses (I don't mean just the bottom...) could have been Prime Minister of Israel. He was almost president of a union but they bought him off with an offer it was better not to refuse. Not that we were ever scared but, still, he had kids and the one hadn't been to the shooting range yet. Anyway he was rank and file at Ford and probably would have made a good union president but instead he went for management and got on the board eventiually as a department head.

Family ? Oh the reverence I have for the Man. He taught me alot and would have more if he had not died, was going to teach me how to buy property with no money. He said "Not on the phone". So all these houses cost him almost nothing. Well he was trying to sell me a house so he was a motivated teacher.

Yeah, I was born on Wednesday but not last Wednesday. For $70,000 but really nothing I get the house. It is built on a slab with no basement and the (relative) elevation is low. IT floods in heavy rains and I don't mean the basement floods, the livingroom, kitchen, bedrooms all flood. Now that can be fixed, for about $25,000. If I even get the house for free I have to find $25,000. He taught me a bit too much to bite on that.

All emotions are choices. If we are in a bar and I kick you in the balls you are going to react a certain way. Probably with well placed anger under control to see if you can kick my ass. Then we have a different situation, you go over this Woman's place to curry her favor, i8f you know what I mean, she has this kid, which you knew, and the kid is climbing all over you.

So that is going just fine, if her kid likes you just wait until he goes to bed... Then with those baby shoes that have the lead/titanium alloy with type S mortar soles. Steps on your balls. It hurts. It hurts ten times worse than when I kicked you.

Anger ? Why not ? Because anger is in your control, if you can exercise that control once you can do it again. Same goes for hate.

Another thing to remember is that people usually hate what they fear. See, I studied psychology before they frigged it all up. I know things. They got the DSM 153 but I got the knowledge.

People hating what they fear is largely in their lack of self confidence in themselves of being able to adapt.

Another thing I wish I could teach is how to see the lies. I really wish I could teach that effectively. You can't lie to me in person, err wait, yes you can but I will know. If I know then... What ?

Example. The TV news. Don't get in the habit but watch. Watch them recite their script and shake their heads back and forth as if to say "no". Know what that means ? What they are saying is scripted, they are simply realisng it and have no idea if it is the truth, even if it is. What is on their mind is looking good and being able to talk to collect that hundred grand a year for no real work.

Trained thesbians can avoid that, but they will never pay for real actors. The people they hire may have had a basic education in it but are nowhere near hireable as actors. Some just go to voice school and other than that get by one their looks. People look up to them and all that which is nuts. There have been a few of note, say Walter Cronkite. Go find some footage of him, he is not shaking his head "no".

 

[bitrex]

On 7/26/19 11:50 PM, jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

Sounds like they're going with "the slimy Jew bankers are trying to
destroy our economy!!!" routine again.

Not to stick up for them but they are not slimy. I know who and what they are and what they do and how they do it. They do what they are taught to do. They also do not want to destroy an economy, they want to exploit it.

They practically invented banking, something that is very beneneficial to trade and capitalism. However they never intended to do it for free. Like they take our military jets and make some really good modifications, and share SOME of them with us, but we gave them those for free anyway because of QME. They have advanced a few things for sure, but not for free.

The Rothschilds have been quiet, know why ? They got it made. Maybe they only have $100 billion laying around, when you are REALLY rich and REALLY know things money is junk. You can't eat it, you can't put it in your car and drive, your plane and fly or your boat and...whatever. So a hundred billion ? Bill Gates probably has that, but the Rothschilds have other assets. One of the most conservative estimates of their holdings was by Credit Suisse at $230 trillion. Yes, with a "T". Other estimates have been more, over twice that.

They have done some nasty things. They made a fortune lying about the outcome of the French revolution, buying valuable war bonds they convinced the holders were worthless for pence on the pound. They made enough money on that to buy the Bank Of England. Historical fact if you care to look it up. Bet that wasn't in your high school world history class.

And don't forget "Secret Weapons For Silent Wars". Written by one of "them", who apparently not only knew commerce but also electronics. He analogised the economy with an electronics circuit. It is brilliant. It is not economics 101 to say the least.

I bought it on paper. You cannot get the whole thing online. Most of it is there but it is missing a few of his hand written formulae.

The way he put it is that capacitance is like money in the bank. Resistance is costs, some unneeded and inductors are labor. This guy was sharp, I understood much of it, which few I know did because they do not have the right background for the analogies to be any good.

The original full version is copies of copies, literally. The "originals" which weren't almost for sure were found in the pan of a Xerox copier coming off lease.

You can call it any kind of conspiracy theory you want but the thing makes too much sense. Like the Protocols, people want to tel me how they are all crap and forgeries (of what ?) but don't say who forged it or why. Why ? To promote anti-Jewism ? Well for one they didn't really need it but still so many things in it are true, think about that.

People who really know consider the content before the source. And I mean "BEFORE" not "INSTEAD OF".

Anyway, Jews are alienated partly by their own ways. First of all clanish, separatists and even racists, openly. Here they live in Solon and that town was named after the word for "lawgiver". What does that tell you ? And it is east of the river where they like to be.

<snip>

The last young Jewish woman I hit the sack with had a very messy bedroom
other than that I had no complaints, very kind and accommodating lady.
not very "clannish" at all.

clothes and stuff left over the floor regularly is a bit of a
relationship deal-breaker for me, though. it's a fire hazard.

 

[bitrex]

On 7/26/19 11:50 PM, jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

Sounds like they're going with "the slimy Jew bankers are trying to
destroy our economy!!!" routine again.

Not to stick up for them but they are not slimy. I know who and what they are and what they do and how they do it. They do what they are taught to do. They also do not want to destroy an economy, they want to exploit it.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley>

In the Jews, Europeans found an "enemy" who was their equal.

Ego demands one have a nemesis that is one's equal. Professor X has
Magneto, Gandalf has Sauron, that Henry Potter or w/e guy has
um...Volde-something.

Professor X's nemesis can't be some poor retarded bagger at the Safeway,
now can it

 

>In the Jews, Europeans found an "enemy" who was their equal.

Agreed.

I think they will long be an adversary to many. They made it to enemy status a certain way but they could have avoided that. Eneminess is in the eye of the enemy. Enemies are simply more dedicated opponents.

You will see me say "YOU KNOW WHAT THEM MFs DID NOW ! ". Still, they are only taught to do what they're taught to do. Most are stone Atheists, some stoned Atheists. They're usually cooler to hang around with.

The big Jews, the ones who own the banks n sit, they are getting out of hand, and it is not the Rothschilds.

You CAN beat the money system, and I would bet money that the the Rothchilds simply don't care. Why should they ? They used to be happy with 15% of 2 billion and now have 50% of 7 billion. If they start whining shoot them. I mean, what do they want ?

I was joking, I know what they want.

 

[Robert Baer]

bitrex wrote:

On 7/26/19 8:36 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-25/presidential-candidate-tulsi-
gabbard-co-sponsors-audit-fed-bill

"Auditing the Fed is the first step in changing monetary policy that has
created a debt-and-bubble-based economy; promoted the welfare-warfare
state; created the most massive wealth inequality crisis in history; led
to an affordable housing crisis; transferred all the wealth to the top
1% of America, and could lead to the collapse of the American empire if
not corrected in the next several years."

So many Republican legislators are on board with this one it's almost
like they're worried people will figure out who the real culprits are lol

Have you EVER heard of a bill that _actually_ does what it says?
Hell, the so-called emancipation act did NOT free (all) of the
slaves; only some of the blacks and NONE of the Irish (who by-the-way
has never made a fuss like the blacks).

 

[bitrex]

On 7/28/19 3:23 AM, Robert Baer wrote:

bitrex wrote:
On 7/26/19 8:36 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-25/presidential-candidate-tulsi-
gabbard-co-sponsors-audit-fed-bill

"Auditing the Fed is the first step in changing monetary policy that
has created a debt-and-bubble-based economy; promoted the
welfare-warfare state; created the most massive wealth inequality
crisis in history; led to an affordable housing crisis; transferred
all the wealth to the top 1% of America, and could lead to the
collapse of the American empire if not corrected in the next several
years."

So many Republican legislators are on board with this one it's almost
like they're worried people will figure out who the real culprits are lol
  Have you EVER heard of a bill that _actually_ does what it says?
  Hell, the so-called emancipation act did NOT free (all) of the
slaves; only some of the blacks and NONE of the Irish (who by-the-way
has never made a fuss like the blacks).

The Irish came here voluntarily! Nobody went to Ireland and forced tens
of thousands of Irish onto ships at gunpoint! Outside of a few manual
labor industries (like railway construction, or picking fruit, say) for
the most part, at the time, they were unwanted here, for any reason!
Slaves had actual cash value to their owners, poor Irish immigrants
didn't have cash value of nothing.

And the Irish were not to my knowledge ever available for retail sale,
like property - I couldn't have ever gone down to the Irish Auction in
1850 and buy a redhead Irish lass of my choosing off-the-shelf for $15.
if this is incorrect please provide a reference otherwise!

 

On Monday, 29 July 2019 01:36:21 UTC+1, bitrex wrote:

The Irish came here voluntarily! Nobody went to Ireland and forced tens
of thousands of Irish onto ships at gunpoint! Outside of a few manual
labor industries (like railway construction, or picking fruit, say) for
the most part, at the time, they were unwanted here, for any reason!
Slaves had actual cash value to their owners, poor Irish immigrants
didn't have cash value of nothing.

And the Irish were not to my knowledge ever available for retail sale,
like property - I couldn't have ever gone down to the Irish Auction in
1850 and buy a redhead Irish lass of my choosing off-the-shelf for $15.
if this is incorrect please provide a reference otherwise!

Slavery was abolished in 1833.


NT

 

[Robert Baer]

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:

On Monday, 29 July 2019 01:36:21 UTC+1, bitrex wrote:

The Irish came here voluntarily! Nobody went to Ireland and forced tens
of thousands of Irish onto ships at gunpoint! Outside of a few manual
labor industries (like railway construction, or picking fruit, say) for
the most part, at the time, they were unwanted here, for any reason!
Slaves had actual cash value to their owners, poor Irish immigrants
didn't have cash value of nothing.

And the Irish were not to my knowledge ever available for retail sale,
like property - I couldn't have ever gone down to the Irish Auction in
1850 and buy a redhead Irish lass of my choosing off-the-shelf for $15.
if this is incorrect please provide a reference otherwise!

Slavery was abolished in 1833.


NT

Untrue; we STILL have it. Blacks, Irish, whites, kids. You name it.

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:50:59 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

> Untrue; we STILL have it. Blacks, Irish, whites, kids. You name it.

*Most* countries in the world in fact have been involved with slavery at
some point in time going back into antiquity. Funny how today only the
trade in slaves brought from Africa is regarded as noteworthy and
deserving of infinite re-telling.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

[bitrex]

On 7/29/19 7:02 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:50:59 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

Untrue; we STILL have it. Blacks, Irish, whites, kids. You name it.

*Most* countries in the world in fact have been involved with slavery at
some point in time going back into antiquity. Funny how today only the
trade in slaves brought from Africa is regarded as noteworthy and
deserving of infinite re-telling.

Probably keeps being re-told because about a quarter of the US
population still seems pretty annoyed that slavery ever ended, you can
find those people flying Confederate flags and campaigning to not have
statues of Robert E. Lee and other huge traitors torn right down as they
should have been ages ago.

 

[bitrex]

On 7/29/19 9:38 PM, bitrex wrote:

On 7/29/19 7:02 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:50:59 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

    Untrue; we STILL have it. Blacks, Irish, whites, kids. You name it.

*Most* countries in the world in fact have been involved with slavery at
some point in time going back into antiquity. Funny how today only the
trade in slaves brought from Africa is regarded as noteworthy and
deserving of infinite re-telling.




Probably keeps being re-told because about a quarter of the US
population still seems pretty annoyed that slavery ever ended, you can
find those people flying Confederate flags and campaigning to not have
statues of Robert E. Lee and other huge traitors torn right down as they
should have been ages ago.

The rest of the United States was frankly generous to let them have
their little memorials to the dream of operating a slave-trading
sovereign nation on the American continent, persisting into the 20th
century, as long as they did. that dream died with Sherman's march to
the sea.

 

On Monday, 29 July 2019 20:52:54 UTC+1, Robert Baer wrote:

tabbypurr wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2019 01:36:21 UTC+1, bitrex wrote:

The Irish came here voluntarily! Nobody went to Ireland and forced tens
of thousands of Irish onto ships at gunpoint! Outside of a few manual
labor industries (like railway construction, or picking fruit, say) for
the most part, at the time, they were unwanted here, for any reason!
Slaves had actual cash value to their owners, poor Irish immigrants
didn't have cash value of nothing.

And the Irish were not to my knowledge ever available for retail sale,
like property - I couldn't have ever gone down to the Irish Auction in
1850 and buy a redhead Irish lass of my choosing off-the-shelf for $15.
if this is incorrect please provide a reference otherwise!

Slavery was abolished in 1833.

Untrue; we STILL have it. Blacks, Irish, whites, kids. You name it.

I didn't say we don't have it, I said it was abolished.
I've never seen any examples of modern day slaves here. Can you give us examples?


NT

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:05:32 -0700, tabbypurr wrote:

I didn't say we don't have it, I said it was abolished.
I've never seen any examples of modern day slaves here. Can you give us
examples?

This gypsy family were heavily into it:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782154/Traveller-family-forced-
homeless-victims-slaves.html

And thanks to the EU, Britain can't deport them after their prison terms
end, because it would violate their human rights. (the EU is a wholly
controlled sub-set of the United Nations, for those unaware of it).



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Tue, 30 Jul 2019 22:14:33 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor
Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in <qhqfg9$tel$4@dont-email.me>:

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:05:32 -0700, tabbypurr wrote:

I didn't say we don't have it, I said it was abolished.
I've never seen any examples of modern day slaves here. Can you give us
examples?

This gypsy family were heavily into it:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782154/Traveller-family-forced-
homeless-victims-slaves.html

And thanks to the EU, Britain can't deport them after their prison terms
end, because it would violate their human rights. (the EU is a wholly
controlled sub-set of the United Nations, for those unaware of it).

I dunno,
in my view it is just big business wanting to create a larger market,
Philips for example, from origin Dutch, wanted the world.
Removing trade barriers, borders, is good for that,
and that is how EU started and where the support comes from.
Is a win-win for companies AND consumers.

What US Precedent trump now does is break world trade down
protectionism, and will ultimately lead to the destruction of US companies.
And the US.

 

[Robert Baer]

Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:50:59 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

Untrue; we STILL have it. Blacks, Irish, whites, kids. You name it.

*Most* countries in the world in fact have been involved with slavery at
some point in time going back into antiquity. Funny how today only the
trade in slaves brought from Africa is regarded as noteworthy and
deserving of infinite re-telling.



A-yup!

 

On Wednesday, 31 July 2019 03:31:21 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Tue, 30 Jul 2019 22:14:33 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor
Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in <qhqfg9$tel$4@dont-email.me>:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:05:32 -0700, tabbypurr wrote:

I didn't say we don't have it, I said it was abolished.
I've never seen any examples of modern day slaves here. Can you give us
examples?

This gypsy family were heavily into it:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782154/Traveller-family-forced-
homeless-victims-slaves.html

And thanks to the EU, Britain can't deport them after their prison terms
end, because it would violate their human rights. (the EU is a wholly
controlled sub-set of the United Nations, for those unaware of it).

I dunno,
in my view it is just big business wanting to create a larger market,
Philips for example, from origin Dutch, wanted the world.
Removing trade barriers, borders, is good for that,
and that is how EU started and where the support comes from.
Is a win-win for companies AND consumers.

What US Precedent trump now does is break world trade down
protectionism, and will ultimately lead to the destruction of US companies.
And the US.

More trade is all well & good. The EU is about something else as well, and there lies the problem.


NT

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Wed, 31 Jul 2019 01:03:27 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
<04403033-76f0-4a97-a907-08cf84f28b54@googlegroups.com>:

On Wednesday, 31 July 2019 03:31:21 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Tue, 30 Jul 2019 22:14:33 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor
Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in <qhqfg9$tel$4@dont-email.me>:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:05:32 -0700, tabbypurr wrote:

I didn't say we don't have it, I said it was abolished.
I've never seen any examples of modern day slaves here. Can you give us
examples?

This gypsy family were heavily into it:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782154/Traveller-family-forced-
homeless-victims-slaves.html

And thanks to the EU, Britain can't deport them after their prison terms
end, because it would violate their human rights. (the EU is a wholly
controlled sub-set of the United Nations, for those unaware of it).

I dunno,
in my view it is just big business wanting to create a larger market,
Philips for example, from origin Dutch, wanted the world.
Removing trade barriers, borders, is good for that,
and that is how EU started and where the support comes from.
Is a win-win for companies AND consumers.

What US Precedent trump now does is break world trade down
protectionism, and will ultimately lead to the destruction of US companies.
And the US.

More trade is all well & good. The EU is about something else as well, and there lies the problem.

Could you perhaps be a bit more specific about what you mean by 'something else'?