OT: United States Supreme Court v. The Deep State...

[John Doe]

The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential for
fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or
weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly
calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According to a USENET
poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts of Justice in
France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report
of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good thing they weren\'t
using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most obvious,
concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it. The cannibal left is insatiable.

 

[John Doe]

Off topic troll.

--
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

Path: not-for-mail
From: John Doe <always.look@message.header
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: OT: United States Supreme Court v. The Deep State
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:29:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <t7d9d6$s0$1@dont-email.me
Injection-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:29:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host=\"75dc12d498acd91626b0e0e995a2de56\";
logging-data=\"896\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@eternal-september.org\"; posting-account=\"U2FsdGVkX1+Ozz36Ib1Q9vt6VVmfGFkEWwqOGQlYTZY=\"
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:el+LPr57BvseZhWAnVJQxAEAm38=
X-Received-Bytes: 1957

The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential for
fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or
weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly
calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According to a USENET
poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts of Justice in
France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report
of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good thing they weren\'t
using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most obvious,
concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it. The cannibal left is insatiable.

 

[Edward Hernandez]

In message-id <t6nt3e$7bp$3@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165357273000) posted Thu, 26 May 2022
12:50:54 -0000 (UTC) John Doe stated:

Always Wrong, the utterly foulmouthed group idiot, adding absolutely
NOTHING but insults to this thread, as usual...

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1533 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
742 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Dope troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:41:14 GMT in
message-id <uYpmK.22576$h01.14017@usenetxs.com>.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that Troll Doe does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

pJBgz4gCg35y

 

[John Doe]

This porn-sucking retard is a nym-shifting stalker troll now.

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look_message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99_gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx04.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Doe <always.look@message.header
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
Subject: OT: United States Supreme Court v. The Deep State
Followup-To: alt.test.group
References: <t7d9d6$s0$1@dont-email.me
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <uYpmK.22576$h01.14017@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:41:14 UTC
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:41:14 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2600
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:670453 free.spam:18490

Off topic troll.

--
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

Path: not-for-mail
From: John Doe <always.look@message.header
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: OT: United States Supreme Court v. The Deep State
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:29:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <t7d9d6$s0$1@dont-email.me
Injection-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:29:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host=\"75dc12d498acd91626b0e0e995a2de56\";
logging-data=\"896\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@eternal-september.org\"; posting-account=\"U2FsdGVkX1+Ozz36Ib1Q9vt6VVmfGFkEWwqOGQlYTZY=\"
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:el+LPr57BvseZhWAnVJQxAEAm38=
X-Received-Bytes: 1957

The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential for
fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or
weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly
calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According to a USENET
poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts of Justice in
France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report
of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good thing they weren\'t
using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most obvious,
concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it. The cannibal left is insatiable.

 

[John Doe]

This porn-sucking retard is a nym-shifting stalker troll now.

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look_message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99_gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.uzoreto.com!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx08.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com
Subject: OT: United States Supreme Court v. The Deep State
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t7d9d6$s0$1@dont-email.me> <uYpmK.22576$h01.14017@usenetxs.com
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <S0qmK.22950$L_.9786@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:45:54 UTC
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:45:54 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2002
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:670454 free.spam:18491

In message-id <t6nt3e$7bp$3@dont-email.me
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165357273000) posted Thu, 26 May 2022
12:50:54 -0000 (UTC) John Doe stated:

Always Wrong, the utterly foulmouthed group idiot, adding absolutely
NOTHING but insults to this thread, as usual...

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1533 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
742 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Dope troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:41:14 GMT in
message-id <uYpmK.22576$h01.14017@usenetxs.com>.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that Troll Doe does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

pJBgz4gCg35y

 

[Edward Hernandez]

In message-id <t6nt3e$7bp$3@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165357273000) posted Thu, 26 May 2022
12:50:54 -0000 (UTC) John Doe stated:

Always Wrong, the utterly foulmouthed group idiot, adding absolutely
NOTHING but insults to this thread, as usual...

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1535 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
744 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless Troll Doe has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Fri, 3 Jun 2022 16:04:20 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t7dbe4$h3b$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that John Dope does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

uuGtS0xanQAr

 

[Edward Hernandez]

Further, John Dope stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope has posted at
least 1535 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
744 have been John Dope \"troll format\" postings.

The John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Dope troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 3 Jun 2022 16:05:37 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t7dbgh$h3b$2@dont-email.me>.

SfeRihDkQSXV

 

[John Doe]

The path in Eddie\'s forgery below perfectly matches, with the likely
inconsequential exception \"peer01/peer03\", one of its other posts...

Message-ID: <xP58J.968292$E24.273493@usenetxs.com>

--
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx04.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Doe <always.look@message.header
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
Subject: OT: United States Supreme Court v. The Deep State
Followup-To: alt.test.group
References: <t7d9d6$s0$1@dont-email.me
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <uYpmK.22576$h01.14017@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:41:14 UTC
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:41:14 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2600
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:670453 free.spam:18490

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:29:49 AM UTC-4, John Doe wrote:
<snip>

Yet another uneducated ignoramus speaks- that\'s two in one day.

English law, of which the U.S. system is an evolution, was founded on the principle of adversarial contest, opposition in all its varied forms is how the system is supposed to work.

The leaked paper was not a future SC decision. It was a draft by Alito which he may have intended to be included in the formal decision whether things went his way or not. They can do that. It\'s called dissent.

 

[Edward Hernandez]

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 59.3% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1537 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
746 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless Troll Doe has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 3 Jun 2022 16:34:13 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t7dd64$h3b$3@dont-email.me>.

TiDZwAkwFqWU

 

[John Doe]

Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

The leaked paper was not a future SC decision. It was a draft by Alito
which he may have intended to be included in the formal decision whether
things went his way or not. They can do that. It\'s called dissent.

That\'s called \"insane\".

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, June 4, 2022 at 2:44:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:

Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

The leaked paper was not a future SC decision. It was a draft by Alito
which he may have intended to be included in the formal decision whether
things went his way or not. They can do that. It\'s called dissent.

That\'s called \"insane\".

The insanity lies in confusing a draft discussion paper with a \"preliminary decision\".

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:t7d9d6$s0$1@dont-email.me:

The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has
potential for fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

You are an idiot. It was \"leaked\" by a member of the right wing,
you stupid fuck.

> It\'s the Deep State

The deep state of your criminal mother\'s ass from the day she shat
you from it.

>overtly opposing one branch of our government.

You\'re an abject idiot.

In congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as
described over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11,
1815...

John Dope could not be more stupid if he tried.

 

[John Doe]

Once again, Bozo misspelled its name...


The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential for
fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or
weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly
calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According to a USENET
poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts of Justice in
France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report
of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good thing they weren\'t
using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most obvious,
concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it. The cannibal left is insatiable.

 

[John Doe]

Always Wrong pretends to know who leaked the Supreme Court document...



The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential for
fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or
weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly
calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According to a USENET
poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts of Justice in
France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report
of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good thing they weren\'t
using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most obvious,
concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it. The cannibal left is insatiable.

 

[bitrex]

On 6/3/2022 4:28 PM, John Doe wrote:

Always Wrong pretends to know who leaked the Supreme Court document...



The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential for
fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or
weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly
calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According to a USENET
poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts of Justice in
France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report
of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good thing they weren\'t
using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most obvious,
concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

It\'s surprising it never happened before, they send this stuff out to
more functionaries than pre-release copies of Taylor Swift albums.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it.

It\'s already being investigated, but there\'s no public oversight
requirement for investigations of this type, and no requirement the
results or consequences of the investigation to ever be made public.
Good chance it won\'t be.

> The cannibal left is insatiable.

The chances it was the \"Deep State\" of Alito or his staff who leaked it
are really good. If we never hear anything about it again I\'d say
approaching 100%

 

[bitrex]

On 6/3/2022 1:03 PM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

On Saturday, June 4, 2022 at 2:44:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

The leaked paper was not a future SC decision. It was a draft by Alito
which he may have intended to be included in the formal decision whether
things went his way or not. They can do that. It\'s called dissent.

That\'s called \"insane\".

The insanity lies in confusing a draft discussion paper with a \"preliminary decision\".

That a draft opinion got leaked on the Internet is probably just
evidence the Supreme Court hasn\'t written anything worth leaking since
the invention of the Internet, not that their secrecy or security is so
amazing.

If you asked 100 Americans to name one landmark SC case of the past 30
years optimistically maybe 5 could answer. Roper v. Simmons (2005) is
the first one that comes to mind for me, that it\'s unconstitutional to
execute people for crimes they committed when legally a child.

Most civilized countries stopped doing that decades or centuries ago.
But most Americans probably fall into two categories, people who thought
it was already illegal by then and people who don\'t give a shit if it is

 

[John Doe]

But of course there is some \"oversight\" in the sense we will be told what
happens. Court cases have NEVER been hidden from the public. We already
know Supreme Court law clerks are being forced to sign an affidavit
stating they had nothing to do with it and are required to hand over their
cell phone records. What the media doesn\'t tell you is (very likely) those
are OFFICIAL cell phone records from their GOVERNMENT phones.

Any of Samuel Alito\'s law clerks lawyering up and refusing to cooperate?

The idea the leak was Samuel Alito\'s fault is like the Los Angeles Times
blaming the leak on Donald Trump. You guys are hard to follow!

What if it was one of the hard-core cannibal leftist justice\'s law clerks?
Likely. Will she spill the beans on Sonja SotoMayor, Elena Kagan, or
Stephen Breyer, giving her instruction, or at least approval, to do so? If
not contemporaneously (like while that judge is still on the bench), maybe
later in a book?



bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 6/3/2022 4:28 PM, John Doe wrote:
Always Wrong pretends to know who leaked the Supreme Court document...



The recent leak of a Supreme Court preliminary decision has potential
for fireworks (or maybe a dud of great consequence).

It\'s the Deep State overtly opposing one branch of our government. In
congress and in the executive branch, it\'s not so obvious, as described
over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815...

\"it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible
and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents
or weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is
incessantly calling for\" (quoted on Merriam-Webster\'s site). According
to a USENET poster, that passage originated from an item headed \"Courts
of Justice in France\", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11,
1815, a report of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville [good
thing they weren\'t using multiple last names back then].

But the Supreme Court leak was an overt direct attack, the most
obvious, concentrated Deep State operation in our history.

It\'s surprising it never happened before, they send this stuff out to
more functionaries than pre-release copies of Taylor Swift albums.

Will it be prosecuted and punished? But even if it is, that won\'t
necessarily be the end of it.
It\'s already being investigated, but there\'s no public oversight
requirement for investigations of this type, and no requirement the
results or consequences of the investigation to ever be made public.
Good chance it won\'t be.

The cannibal left is insatiable.

The chances it was the \"Deep State\" of Alito or his staff who leaked it
are really good. If we never hear anything about it again I\'d say
approaching 100%

 

[rbowman]

On 06/04/2022 07:40 AM, bitrex wrote:

That a draft opinion got leaked on the Internet is probably just
evidence the Supreme Court hasn\'t written anything worth leaking since
the invention of the Internet, not that their secrecy or security is so
amazing.

If you asked 100 Americans to name one landmark SC case of the past 30
years optimistically maybe 5 could answer. Roper v. Simmons (2005) is
the first one that comes to mind for me, that it\'s unconstitutional to
execute people for crimes they committed when legally a child.

Kelo v. City of New London -- A city government can use the power of
eminent domain to transfer land from one private party to another.

Citizens United v. FEC -- Corporations can pour money into political
campaigns.

National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius et al. -- John
Roberts saves A.C.A, explains to Democrats how to write a law.

King v. Burwell -- More of the same

 

[whit3rd]

On Saturday, June 4, 2022 at 9:56:58 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:

But of course there is some \"oversight\" in the sense we will be told what
happens. Court cases have NEVER been hidden from the public. We already
know...

The issue isn\'t public knowledge; all court cases are on record. What is NOT
public, is the internal discussions of the justices, which might allow a savvy
advocate to shape a personally-appealing but legal-logic-unfounded argument
that carries a decision. The \'cult of the personality\' approach is detrimental
to the work of a judicial institution.

When the court publishes a decision, the elements of that decision, as written,
are precedent to all subsequent decisions, guiding lower courts. Individual
outliers\' musings and comments are NOT such guidance.