J
Jim Thompson
Guest
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In about 13 years, you will be beating the boys away with a stick.http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
Ok, THAT'S ADORABLE!http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
Delightful as the picture is, I still think you should not put pictureshttp://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
This emphasises what I wrote about the (mis)appropriation of faces.Most Arizonians start out almost as cute as lovely Miss. Thompson, but
their proximity to the sun takes a terrible toll. Don't believe me? Look
at this five year old photo of our own Mr. Thompson that my Internet
sleuthing turned up.
http://www.theliquidimage.com/samplpages/sports/images/malebody.jpg
Sure, he's showing some signs of his age, but he's holding up fairly
well, don't you think?
Big deal. There are millions of (normal) pictures of children on theI read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote (in <tkotg0dn9rtlcphic7at2p4oqlhevjr3kb@
4ax.com> about 'OT: The youngest Thompson', on Mon, 2 Aug 2004:
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
Delightful as the picture is, I still think you should not put pictures
of children on the net, in case the faces are appropriated by
paedophiles to disguise their victims.
Aaaargh! I should have thought of that :-(I read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote (in <tkotg0dn9rtlcphic7at2p4oqlhevjr3kb@
4ax.com> about 'OT: The youngest Thompson', on Mon, 2 Aug 2004:
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/flowergirl.JPG
Allison Rose Thompson, age three.
Delightful as the picture is, I still think you should not put pictures
of children on the net, in case the faces are appropriated by
paedophiles to disguise their victims.
But IMHO, there should not be. You can e-mail your kidpix to yourBig deal. There are millions of (normal) pictures of children on the
net.
No, but if that 'one more' happens to be the one that's appropriated,One more won't upset the paedophiles community.
Well the face certainly isn't mine, the body maybe, but not the faceI read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that Richard Kanarek
FirstInitialthenLastName@spamcop.net> wrote (in <ffsug09qb02bh7b4906nfh
jv1q36anum4g@4ax.com> about 'OT: The youngest Thompson', on Tue, 3 Aug
2004:
Most Arizonians start out almost as cute as lovely Miss. Thompson, but
their proximity to the sun takes a terrible toll. Don't believe me? Look
at this five year old photo of our own Mr. Thompson that my Internet
sleuthing turned up.
http://www.theliquidimage.com/samplpages/sports/images/malebody.jpg
Sure, he's showing some signs of his age, but he's holding up fairly
well, don't you think?
This emphasises what I wrote about the (mis)appropriation of faces.
Allison Rose looks more than a bit like him, IMO, but that's littleOnly Spehro knows what I really look like. I don't think anyone else
on these groups has ever even seen a photo.
...Jim Thompson
I forgot about dropping by at PSpice Support a few years ago ;-)Jim Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 19:54:11 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:
I read in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic that Richard Kanarek
FirstInitialthenLastName@spamcop.net> wrote (in <ffsug09qb02bh7b4906nfh
jv1q36anum4g@4ax.com> about 'OT: The youngest Thompson', on Tue, 3 Aug
2004:
Most Arizonians start out almost as cute as lovely Miss. Thompson, but
their proximity to the sun takes a terrible toll. Don't believe me? Look
at this five year old photo of our own Mr. Thompson that my Internet
sleuthing turned up.
http://www.theliquidimage.com/samplpages/sports/images/malebody.jpg
Sure, he's showing some signs of his age, but he's holding up fairly
well, don't you think?
This emphasises what I wrote about the (mis)appropriation of faces.
Well the face certainly isn't mine, the body maybe, but not the face
;-)
Only Spehro knows what I really look like. I don't think anyone else
on these groups has ever even seen a photo.
...Jim Thompson
Oh, a couple of us have seen you, at some time or another...
--
Charlie