F
Flyguy
Guest
http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
J
John Doe
Guest
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
It\'s obvious and shameful. The fact Joseph Biden was giving away American
taxpayer money in exchange for money paid to his son. And to think no one
has done anything about it yet, the crook is even running for president...
> http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
It\'s obvious and shameful. The fact Joseph Biden was giving away American
taxpayer money in exchange for money paid to his son. And to think no one
has done anything about it yet, the crook is even running for president...
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 11:47:32 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Not a fact, a fantasy. The money was voted by Congress. The decisions made by
the entire administration (President, VP, and secretary of state) are not personally
those of Joe Biden. The foreign court considering these facts (and factoids, and baseless
accusations) has, in any case, no jurisdiction over a VP performing his duties in the US.
The obvious fact, is that John Doe doesn\'t read anything but sensational headlines of
the trashiest journals he can find.
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
It\'s obvious and shameful. The fact Joseph Biden was giving away American
taxpayer money in exchange for money paid to his son.
Not a fact, a fantasy. The money was voted by Congress. The decisions made by
the entire administration (President, VP, and secretary of state) are not personally
those of Joe Biden. The foreign court considering these facts (and factoids, and baseless
accusations) has, in any case, no jurisdiction over a VP performing his duties in the US.
The obvious fact, is that John Doe doesn\'t read anything but sensational headlines of
the trashiest journals he can find.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 12:07:21 PM UTC+11, whit3rd wrote:
It was Flyguy who picked up the story and posted the link here. John Doe merely endorsed it - which was pretty stupid too - but Flyguy is the original gullible twit here.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 11:47:32 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
It\'s obvious and shameful. The fact Joseph Biden was giving away American
taxpayer money in exchange for money paid to his son.
Not a fact, a fantasy. The money was voted by Congress. The decisions made by
the entire administration (President, VP, and secretary of state) are not personally
those of Joe Biden. The foreign court considering these facts (and factoids, and baseless
accusations) has, in any case, no jurisdiction over a VP performing his duties in the US.
The obvious fact, is that John Doe doesn\'t read anything but sensational headlines of
the trashiest journals he can find.
It was Flyguy who picked up the story and posted the link here. John Doe merely endorsed it - which was pretty stupid too - but Flyguy is the original gullible twit here.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
J
John Doe
Guest
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
Nevermind, I misread the post I replied to.
> The Donald has been in court many times;
He wins a lot. If you don\'t recognize that, you are assuming away the enemy.
> as President, he was impeached.
Absolutely nothing but politics. Democrats want to use the 25th amendment too,
even though the chance of it succeeding is obviously ZERO.
If Trump\'s current Supreme Court nominee makes it to the Supreme Court, do you
think packing our Supreme Court is appropriate?
Do you think Biden should take a stand on issues, or wait until after the
election before telling us what he will do if elected? LOL
> John Doe wrote:
Nevermind, I misread the post I replied to.
> The Donald has been in court many times;
He wins a lot. If you don\'t recognize that, you are assuming away the enemy.
> as President, he was impeached.
Absolutely nothing but politics. Democrats want to use the 25th amendment too,
even though the chance of it succeeding is obviously ZERO.
If Trump\'s current Supreme Court nominee makes it to the Supreme Court, do you
think packing our Supreme Court is appropriate?
Do you think Biden should take a stand on issues, or wait until after the
election before telling us what he will do if elected? LOL
J
John Doe
Guest
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
LOL
I hope Biden wins. The ensuing chaos and violence will be entertaining. Our
markets being flooded with more Communist Chinese crap. Our military being
trashed. Americans being held hostage. The economy tanking.
It\'s only a matter of time anyway. May as well get it over with.
Do you think Biden should take a stand on issues, or wait until after the
election before telling us what he will do if elected? LOL
LOL
I hope Biden wins. The ensuing chaos and violence will be entertaining. Our
markets being flooded with more Communist Chinese crap. Our military being
trashed. Americans being held hostage. The economy tanking.
It\'s only a matter of time anyway. May as well get it over with.
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 12:28:57 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
How does \'win\' apply to bankruptcy? Any loser can call himself a winner.
Yes, impeachment is politics. Politics matters. As for what Democrats want,
that isn\'t impeachment just now, but another politics thing, an election. You can
read about that in the news.
I don\'t, because having a discussion with nine justices is already kinda... stretching
the decision process WAY beyond the timescale for swift decision.
You are right to laugh; packing the Court is a suggestion from the FDR era,
and completely NOT an issue. Take a stand on it yourself, no one will care.
No one should care. \"No comment\" is totally reasonable, and it ought not be
considered news. Read, instead, about the REAL issues, before you vote.
whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
The Donald has been in court many times;
He wins a lot. If you don\'t recognize that, you are assuming away the enemy.
How does \'win\' apply to bankruptcy? Any loser can call himself a winner.
as President, he was impeached.
Absolutely nothing but politics. Democrats want ...
Yes, impeachment is politics. Politics matters. As for what Democrats want,
that isn\'t impeachment just now, but another politics thing, an election. You can
read about that in the news.
If Trump\'s current Supreme Court nominee makes it to the Supreme Court, do you
think packing our Supreme Court is appropriate?
I don\'t, because having a discussion with nine justices is already kinda... stretching
the decision process WAY beyond the timescale for swift decision.
Do you think Biden should take a stand on issues, or wait until after the
election before telling us what he will do if elected? LOL
You are right to laugh; packing the Court is a suggestion from the FDR era,
and completely NOT an issue. Take a stand on it yourself, no one will care.
No one should care. \"No comment\" is totally reasonable, and it ought not be
considered news. Read, instead, about the REAL issues, before you vote.
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 3:28:23 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Fox news wasted their interview time on a question from nearly
a century ago, as though it were a current concern. Then, they decided
to air the \'no comment\' dismissal from a well-grounded-in-reality
Joe Biden, who would like REAL issues discussed.
The waste of time, was committed by Fox News. Go ahead and ask
them.
The clever editing of an interview gave you the \'obvious\', but only
a wild stretching of the imagination can give you \'intention\'. Your
conclusions make no sense, as usual. On the other hand, your grammar
and punctuation are acceptable (it\'s relaxing not to see those exclamation points).
whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
If Trump\'s current Supreme Court nominee makes it to the Supreme Court,
do you think packing our Supreme Court is appropriate?
I don\'t, because having a discussion with nine justices is already
kinda... stretching the decision process WAY beyond the timescale for
swift decision.
Do you think Biden should take a stand on issues, or wait until after
the election before telling us what he will do if elected? LOL
You are right to laugh; packing the Court is a suggestion from the FDR
era, and completely NOT an issue.
Then why don\'t they say \"No we won\'t\" and just dismiss the issue. May as
well. The question probably will not go away.
If it\'s not an issue, why are they wasting so much time avoiding it?
Fox news wasted their interview time on a question from nearly
a century ago, as though it were a current concern. Then, they decided
to air the \'no comment\' dismissal from a well-grounded-in-reality
Joe Biden, who would like REAL issues discussed.
The waste of time, was committed by Fox News. Go ahead and ask
them.
...it ought not be considered news. Read, instead, about the REAL
issues, before you vote.
But obviously their intention is to pack the court.
The clever editing of an interview gave you the \'obvious\', but only
a wild stretching of the imagination can give you \'intention\'. Your
conclusions make no sense, as usual. On the other hand, your grammar
and punctuation are acceptable (it\'s relaxing not to see those exclamation points).
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:01:32 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
> What you {*****} have pretty much ignored here is that neither you nor Sleepy Joe can just brush off a criminal investigation. It\'s a BIG FUCKING DEAL (in the words of Sleepy Joe himself).
A foreign court can do its investigation, but they aren\'t investigating Joe Biden (and
couldn\'t claim jurisdiction over his actions in any case). You\'ve been spreading
exaggerations and lies in the runup to an election, and no one can ignore YOU,
but candidate Biden can certainly ignore the investigation referred to. He
has to choose the new White House decor, after all; that really IS important.
> What you {*****} have pretty much ignored here is that neither you nor Sleepy Joe can just brush off a criminal investigation. It\'s a BIG FUCKING DEAL (in the words of Sleepy Joe himself).
A foreign court can do its investigation, but they aren\'t investigating Joe Biden (and
couldn\'t claim jurisdiction over his actions in any case). You\'ve been spreading
exaggerations and lies in the runup to an election, and no one can ignore YOU,
but candidate Biden can certainly ignore the investigation referred to. He
has to choose the new White House decor, after all; that really IS important.
S
server
Guest
On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 1:00:03 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
> http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
Do you know what football position Joe played in High School?
..... half-back
> http://www.globalmediaplanet.info/joe-biden-now-formally-part-criminal-investigation/
Do you know what football position Joe played in High School?
..... half-back
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
Hardly - I am merely reporting what is in the NEWS. The US does not have an extradition treaty with Ukraine, but Biden is being publically humiliated as the target of a criminal investigation. And were he to be convicted, he dare not set foot in Ukraine again, or any country with which Ukraine does have an extradition treaty.
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:01:32 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
What you {*****} have pretty much ignored here is that neither you nor Sleepy Joe can just brush off a criminal investigation. It\'s a BIG FUCKING DEAL (in the words of Sleepy Joe himself).
A foreign court can do its investigation, but they aren\'t investigating Joe Biden (and
couldn\'t claim jurisdiction over his actions in any case). You\'ve been spreading
exaggerations and lies in the runup to an election, and no one can ignore YOU,
but candidate Biden can certainly ignore the investigation referred to. He
has to choose the new White House decor, after all; that really IS important.
Hardly - I am merely reporting what is in the NEWS. The US does not have an extradition treaty with Ukraine, but Biden is being publically humiliated as the target of a criminal investigation. And were he to be convicted, he dare not set foot in Ukraine again, or any country with which Ukraine does have an extradition treaty.
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 4:00:16 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
No, you\'re distorting and amplifying some obscure investigation notes from half the world away.
>The US does not have an extradition treaty with Ukraine, but Biden is being publically humiliated as the target of a criminal investigation.
No, not \'target\', but \'subject\', and probably just witness-we\'d-like-to-interview. Investigations
are always kept semi-secret, though, so the Ukraine connection is an information sink more than source.
Definitely NOT public nor humiliating. You\'re making things up; do you have a good salary for shill
work? Authors of political scat have only two more weeks of full employment, do you have
another gig lined up yet?
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:01:32 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
What you {*****} have pretty much ignored here is that neither you nor Sleepy Joe can just brush off a criminal investigation. It\'s a BIG FUCKING DEAL (in the words of Sleepy Joe himself).
A foreign court can do its investigation, but they aren\'t investigating Joe Biden (and
couldn\'t claim jurisdiction over his actions in any case). You\'ve been spreading
exaggerations and lies in the runup to an election, and no one can ignore YOU,
but candidate Biden can certainly ignore the investigation referred to. He
has to choose the new White House decor, after all; that really IS important.
Hardly - I am merely reporting what is in the NEWS.
No, you\'re distorting and amplifying some obscure investigation notes from half the world away.
>The US does not have an extradition treaty with Ukraine, but Biden is being publically humiliated as the target of a criminal investigation.
No, not \'target\', but \'subject\', and probably just witness-we\'d-like-to-interview. Investigations
are always kept semi-secret, though, so the Ukraine connection is an information sink more than source.
Definitely NOT public nor humiliating. You\'re making things up; do you have a good salary for shill
work? Authors of political scat have only two more weeks of full employment, do you have
another gig lined up yet?