A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
Today\'s Proceeding of the (US) National Academy of Sciences has an interesting paper. The authors are Dutch and the first author is somebody we know and think well of.
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/51/e2107848118.full.pdf
I find the conclusions a bit worrying. If we were a bit better at discriminating between emotion-based and rationally based opinion, I\'d be less worried.
John Larkin clearly prefers climate change denial propaganda to the rather more depressing realities of atmospheric science.
--
Bill Sloman. Sydney
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/51/e2107848118.full.pdf
I find the conclusions a bit worrying. If we were a bit better at discriminating between emotion-based and rationally based opinion, I\'d be less worried.
John Larkin clearly prefers climate change denial propaganda to the rather more depressing realities of atmospheric science.
--
Bill Sloman. Sydney