OT: NASA IMAGING SCIENTIST CONFIRMS BUSH WIRED DURING THE DE

Fred Bloggs wrote...
The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.
So that's why he stopped mid-sentence and said, "Let me finish,"
even though the debate timer hadn't shown his time was anywhere
near to being up. He was talking back to his blabbering earpiece.

Fred, do you have a link for us?


--
Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dotties-org for now)
 
On 30 Oct 2004 04:35:30 -0700, Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:

Fred Bloggs wrote...

The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.

So that's why he stopped mid-sentence and said, "Let me finish,"
even though the debate timer hadn't shown his time was anywhere
near to being up. He was talking back to his blabbering earpiece.

Fred, do you have a link for us?

Hell, if those bumps were electronics, there's enough there to be a
phased-array radar. And who wears a radio receiver on their back?

John
 
Winfield Hill wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote...

The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.


So that's why he stopped mid-sentence and said, "Let me finish,"
even though the debate timer hadn't shown his time was anywhere
near to being up. He was talking back to his blabbering earpiece.

Fred, do you have a link for us?
It was a wireless microphone system with induction loop transmission
from receiver to ear piece. Apparently Bush has been observed doing this
before. Here is a site with links to actual government equipment:
http://low.fi/bush-bulge/
 
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 04:35:30 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:

Fred Bloggs wrote...

The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.

So that's why he stopped mid-sentence and said, "Let me finish," even
though the debate timer hadn't shown his time was anywhere near to being
up. He was talking back to his blabbering earpiece.

Fred, do you have a link for us?
Frankly, I saw the pix, and to me it's not a big deal whether he was
wired or not. At least there was _somebody_ trying to get him through
the event. And electronics on people on stage are quite routine.

And as far as the pix enhancements, all I could think of was trying to
resolve that damn face on Mars.

As far as I'm ocncerned, there's enough dirt on him that we don't need
to reiterate that he's a mindless dupe.

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:21:40 +0000, Chris Carlen wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Hell, if those bumps were electronics, there's enough there to be a
phased-array radar. And who wears a radio receiver on their back?

That's my problem with the whole thing. Obviously if they wanted to wire
Bush, they could have done so more discretely. Either his handlers are
really really dumb (maniacal yes, but dumb no), or it was just a bulge.

It's a sad commentary on the state of the Nation when the President
wears a $75.00 suit.

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:07:45 GMT, xray <notreally@hotmail.invalid>
wrote:


2) I could filter the information in such a way as to help my leader
better understand. For instance: I would receive, "I want you to check
out that valley to the north." I would pass this on to Lt. as, "Captain
says he wants us to form two columns on opposite sides of the stream and
patrol up this valley."

Actually, I guess this is pretty much what GWB's staff is doing.

I sure hope so; that's what he hired them to do.

John
 
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:39:45 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:07:45 GMT, xray <notreally@hotmail.invalid
wrote:


2) I could filter the information in such a way as to help my leader
better understand. For instance: I would receive, "I want you to check
out that valley to the north." I would pass this on to Lt. as, "Captain
says he wants us to form two columns on opposite sides of the stream and
patrol up this valley."

Actually, I guess this is pretty much what GWB's staff is doing.


I sure hope so; that's what he hired them to do.
Well in my story, I wasn't paid very well. I just took it upon myself to
try to mitigate a different dangerous idiot.
 
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:21:40 GMT, Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net>
wrote:

Either his handlers
are really really dumb (maniacal yes, but dumb no), or it was just a bulge.
When the president visited Boston back in March 2004 he stayed at the Park Plaza
Hotel. The signal from the system he was using could clearly be heard more than
1500 feet away, and one of his advisors could be heard doing voice checks and
then feeding him data about the school he was about to visit.

There's a track record, here.

Jon
 
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:21:40 GMT, Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net
wrote:


Either his handlers
are really really dumb (maniacal yes, but dumb no), or it was just a bulge.


When the president visited Boston back in March 2004 he stayed at the Park Plaza
Hotel. The signal from the system he was using could clearly be heard more than
1500 feet away, and one of his advisors could be heard doing voice checks and
then feeding him data about the school he was about to visit.

There's a track record, here.

Jon
Johnathan, where did you hear about this Park Plaza story?

I guess I'm just a hard-core skeptic, no matter how much I'd *like* to
believe something is true. Unless I can see it myself, I remain
unconvinced. Thus, I am unconvinced about a lot of things. That what
bugs me so much about politics, is that it appears people believe
according to whether it already agrees with their political view, not
because it is a very credible report. I realize this bulge thingy might
actually be a wire, but I'll take a long time to be convinced of it,
unless the Pres. himself came right out and admitted it. Even though my
political inclinations lead me to suspect that it is not beneath the
President and his handlers to do such a slimy thing, I don't believe it
merely for that reason. Nor do I bias toward believing "reports" about
it one way or another.

If everyone were *truly* scientific with regard to the criteria with
which they judge truth, then we would be a much humbler and mutually
respecting people. I think it's Ok to just say "I just don't know"
about a lot of things. It's so often the only honest answer.


Good day!


--
_____________________
Christopher R. Carlen
crobc@earthlink.net
SuSE 9.1 Linux 2.6.5
 
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
It was against the rules. But I'm sure that Kerry was aware of it.
?!?!?!?



Good day!


--
_____________________
Christopher R. Carlen
crobc@earthlink.net
SuSE 9.1 Linux 2.6.5
 
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:21:21 GMT, Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net>
wrote:

It was against the rules. But I'm sure that Kerry was aware of it.

?!?!?!?
How could he have missed it?

Jon
 
"Fred Bloggs" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4183063D.8030102@nospam.com...
The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.
What on earth difference would it make? This wasn't a contest to see
who had best memory for details. Frankly, I hope Bush DID have help
from offstage. At least he knows where to go for good info.

Norm Strong
 
Spehro Pefhany wrote:

IIRC the WW II stuff was so heavy that it was all one guy could carry,
(someone else had to carry his kit) and even so it was more than
average weight. I guess they'd be a preferential target as well.
I never carried the -10 but did the -25 and -77, it's nothing, worn
under backpack- which is shed quickly in firefight- and yes, the
communications and crew served weapons are killed off first. That radio
brings in indirect fire, artillery, onto predesignated coordinates, and
ground air support counter-attacks, and possibly reinforcements- so it
represents a lot of retaliatory lethality- it has to go- very high death
rate of radio operators in combat.
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:49:01 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:


On 30 Oct 2004 04:35:30 -0700, Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:


Fred Bloggs wrote...

The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.

So that's why he stopped mid-sentence and said, "Let me finish,"
even though the debate timer hadn't shown his time was anywhere
near to being up. He was talking back to his blabbering earpiece.

Fred, do you have a link for us?


Hell, if those bumps were electronics, there's enough there to be a
phased-array radar. And who wears a radio receiver on their back?

John




I was watching this debate... someone on-stage said something
(probably Kerry and his ugly yap).

...Jim Thompson
Nah- you're wrong- every astute observer was taken aback by it. Bush has
been observed wearing this system before- it is in common use among
entertainers and anyone else who would otherwise suffer public image
problems if appearances are not maintained.
 
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:22:21 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

http://www.olive-drab.com/od_electronics_anprc10.php



Wow, cool web site.

I'm always amazed by the klunkiness of older electronic gear, even
test instruments. Most of the 50s-60s vintage tube gear was packaged
in huge ugly grey or black steel boxes, lots bigger and heavier than
it needed to be. Things like HP sig gens and wave analyzers were
absurd, even the early transistorized stuff. Tek made perhaps the
first light (color, if not mass), airy sorts of boxes.
IIRC the WW II stuff was so heavy that it was all one guy could carry,
(someone else had to carry his kit) and even so it was more than
average weight. I guess they'd be a preferential target as well.

So, was W wearing a military backpack radio set? With the canvass-web
harnesses and optional combat belt?
John
Seems unlikely.


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
Chris Carlen wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

On 30 Oct 2004 04:35:30 -0700, Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:


Fred Bloggs wrote...

The brain dead maggot needed some techno-assist.


So that's why he stopped mid-sentence and said, "Let me finish,"
even though the debate timer hadn't shown his time was anywhere
near to being up. He was talking back to his blabbering earpiece.

Fred, do you have a link for us?




Hell, if those bumps were electronics, there's enough there to be a
phased-array radar. And who wears a radio receiver on their back?

John



That's my problem with the whole thing. Obviously if they wanted to
wire Bush, they could have done so more discretely. Either his handlers
are really really dumb (maniacal yes, but dumb no), or it was just a bulge.


Good day!
No the case at all- Bush has been doing this so routinely in less
critical appearances that he got sloppy during the debates- too damned
dumb to anticipate what people may think-hmmmm- total absence of
anticipation seems to be a constant with him. You have to realize that
up until the debates, Bush only appeared in front of unquestioning,
mindless, lackey, hand-picked supporters- so why worry about a wireless
mic then- who would care.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top