OT: N95? Humbug.

D

Davej

Guest
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a mask
where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing UV lamp
or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the military surplus
NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?
 
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a mask
where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing UV lamp
or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the military surplus
NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?

This article tha James posted in the other thread is illuminating on the
properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have guessed that
alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.

<https://utrf.tennessee.edu/information-faqs-performance-protection-sterilization-of-face-mask-materials/>

It's probably very hard to get viruses out of body fluids without a lot
of other stuff in the droplet, which dries down to something quite a lot
larger than the virus. A 30-um droplet that's 99.5% water dries down
into a solid particle of about 30 um * (0.005)**1/3 = 5 um diameter.

BITD I did a lot of work in submicron aerosol detection, and I can tell
you that making good submicron aerosols is not something that happens by
accident. You start with a medical aspirator, a very well-filtered air
pump, ultrafiltered 18.2 megohm deionized water, a tiny small amount of
Fisher Triton-X surfactant, and standard suspensions of polystyrene
latex (PSL) or colloidal gold spheres. You dilute the spheres until the
probability of getting two in one droplet is negligible.

You can make good 0.1 um aerosols that way, but anything smaller is
significantly harder--that cube root is tough to fight.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:4b6a7a7c-9909-4ac3-b71c-0dffca69a495@googlegroups.com:

Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?

Flu is 0.15 micron

Covid-19 is 0.08 micron
 
On 4/9/20 9:10 AM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a mask
where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing UV lamp
or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the military surplus
NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article tha James posted in the other thread is illuminating on the
properties of N95/N99 masks.  For instance, I wouldn't have guessed that
alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.

https://utrf.tennessee.edu/information-faqs-performance-protection-sterilization-of-face-mask-materials/


It's probably very hard to get viruses out of body fluids without a lot
of other stuff in the droplet, which dries down to something quite a lot
larger than the virus.  A 30-um droplet that's 99.5% water dries down
into a solid particle of about 30 um * (0.005)**1/3 = 5 um diameter.

BITD I did a lot of work in submicron aerosol detection, and I can tell
you that making good submicron aerosols is not something that happens by
accident.  You start with a medical aspirator, a very well-filtered air
pump, ultrafiltered 18.2 megohm deionized water, a tiny small amount of
Fisher Triton-X surfactant, and standard suspensions of polystyrene
latex (PSL) or colloidal gold spheres.  You dilute the spheres until the
probability of getting two in one droplet is negligible.

You can make good 0.1 um aerosols that way, but anything smaller is
significantly harder--that cube root is tough to fight.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
How effective is an organic vapor cartridge, as in masks for paint
spraying? I know they stop some nasty stuff, such as brake cleaner
aerosol, very effectively.
-bill m
 
How effective is an organic vapor cartridge, as in masks for paint
spraying? I know they stop some nasty stuff, such as brake cleaner
aerosol, very effectively.

Gases diffuse around rapidly, so the air just has to hang around within a couple of diffusion lengths of the adsorber briefly.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
On 4/9/20 12:19 PM, pcdhobbs@gmail.com wrote:
How effective is an organic vapor cartridge, as in masks for paint
spraying? I know they stop some nasty stuff, such as brake cleaner
aerosol, very effectively.

Gases diffuse around rapidly, so the air just has to hang around within a couple of diffusion lengths of the adsorber briefly.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

The cartridge claims to be activated charcoal, goodness I suppose
depends on how long it's been exposed to the atmosphere. Still no smell
of solvent getting through the old one I have. I store the canisters in
a screw-top plastic container most of the time, to keep away from
atmosphere. Looking a little further, this thing has an N95 disc in
front of the canister.
I do wonder about the statement that the N95 masks are for others
benefit, since they all have an exhaust path which does not get filtered
at all. The filtering, for whatever it's worth, is all on the intake
airflow. Best I can see is that exhaust air is directed away from front,
down & to sides, but does that really help?
-bill m
 
It'll help with particles large enough to hit the surfaces

My reusable N99 has valves, probably to prevent it from losing contact during a cough or sneeze.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 8:56:13 AM UTC-7, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a mask
where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing UV lamp ...

A virus load in an aspirated droplet is an infection danger proportional to
the droplet VOLUME, and the smallest droplets are not the important ones.
Conversely, an irritant or allergen is active in proportion to the droplet
AREA, and smaller particles means lots of area per milligram of material.

A UV sterilization air handler is a good idea for a purpose-built hospital
building, but filters are simple cordless devices and UV lamp banks are not.
Still, an upflow air system for a public space would have some collection
efficiency on aspirated droplets, and keep 'em off of surfaces.
 
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a mask
where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing UV lamp
or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the military surplus
NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating on the
properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have guessed that
alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.

Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter? I am curious how the N95
uses a critical electrostatic charge in that nasty fuzzy material while
the round pink P100 filters look like a totally different design.
 
On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.

From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:38:27 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.


From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I haven't seen anyone in Safeway using scuba gear, but I'm always
optimistic.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 9:55:44 AM UTC-4, Davej wrote:

Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter? I am curious how the N95
uses a critical electrostatic charge in that nasty fuzzy material while
the round pink P100 filters look like a totally different design.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Honeywell-16-in-x-25-in-x-1-in-Elite-Allergen-Pleated-FPR-10-Replacement-Air-Filter-91001-011625/203145844

???

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
On 2020-04-10, dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com <dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 9:55:44 AM UTC-4, Davej wrote:

Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter? I am curious how the N95
uses a critical electrostatic charge in that nasty fuzzy material while
the round pink P100 filters look like a totally different design.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Honeywell-16-in-x-25-in-x-1-in-Elite-Allergen-Pleated-FPR-10-Replacement-Air-Filter-91001-011625/203145844

???

"Captures particles as small as 0.3 microns" it doesn't say how many
of those small particles it stops.



--
Jasen.
 
Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote in
news:r6qsou$mbf$1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org:

On 2020-04-10, dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com <dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 9:55:44 AM UTC-4, Davej wrote:

Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter? I am curious how
the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that nasty fuzzy
material while the round pink P100 filters look like a totally
different design.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Honeywell-16-in-x-25-in-x-1-in-Elite-A
llergen-Pleated-FPR-10-Replacement-Air-Filter-91001-011625/2031458
44

???

"Captures particles as small as 0.3 microns" it doesn't say how
many of those small particles it stops.

We had ES filter AND a UV chamber in our HVAC system.
I do not know if it got items that small, but it sure got most
regular sized dust particulate. The house was very clean.
 
On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.


From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Is this internal charge scheme then also the mechanism for HEPA
vacuum bags? There has been controversy regarding their use for
mask filters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmYt_wtaLCk

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/
 
On 2020-04-11 11:37, Davej wrote:
On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.


From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


Is this internal charge scheme then also the mechanism for HEPA
vacuum bags? There has been controversy regarding their use for
mask filters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmYt_wtaLCk

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/

Dunno. The effect has been used for air filtering since the '70s that I
know about.

Dr. David Price, an ICU pulmanologist of Weill Cornell Medical Center in
NYC, has a very encouraging video about precautions. It's a recorded
Zoom conference from a couple of weeks ago, so it's a bit rambling, but
we all have lots of time on our hands at the moment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wr9Z_enNQ4

The tl;dr is that the vast bulk of cases are transmitted by sustained
close contact with somebody showing symptoms (or who will show them
within a couple of days), followed by touching your face. He says we
all have to become "hand nazis". ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
On Saturday, April 11, 2020 at 11:50:30 AM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-11 11:37, Davej wrote:
On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.


From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


Is this internal charge scheme then also the mechanism for HEPA
vacuum bags? There has been controversy regarding their use for
mask filters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmYt_wtaLCk

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/


Dunno. The effect has been used for air filtering since the '70s that I
know about.

Dr. David Price, an ICU pulmanologist of Weill Cornell Medical Center in
NYC, has a very encouraging video about precautions. It's a recorded
Zoom conference from a couple of weeks ago, so it's a bit rambling, but
we all have lots of time on our hands at the moment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wr9Z_enNQ4

The tl;dr is that the vast bulk of cases are transmitted by sustained
close contact with somebody showing symptoms (or who will show them
within a couple of days), followed by touching your face. He says we
all have to become "hand nazis". ;)

That was helpful Phil, thanks.

At 40:00-ish he speculates that incubation period varies inversely
with initial dose, to which I can imagine Dad nodding in agreement,
halo wobbling :).

And in that same vein, I'm as sure as ever that regularly, daily
stirring one's juices for a sustained interval greatly improves
your immune cells' probability of bouncing into, recognizing, and
responding to wrong things early, whether cancer, bacteria, or
Wu-Ping Cough.

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com>
wrote:

On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.


From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


Is this internal charge scheme then also the mechanism for HEPA
vacuum bags? There has been controversy regarding their use for
mask filters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmYt_wtaLCk

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/

I've seen in several places instructions for making a mask from a
bandanna and two layers of coffee filter. Try breathing through even
one layer of coffee filter.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
On Monday, April 13, 2020 at 3:33:47 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com
wrote:

Is this internal charge scheme then also the mechanism for HEPA
vacuum bags? There has been controversy regarding their use for
mask filters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmYt_wtaLCk

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/

I've seen in several places instructions for making a mask from a
bandanna and two layers of coffee filter. Try breathing through even
one layer of coffee filter.

That's the motivation for electrets in the N95 -- fewer layers makes
for higher filtration with less obstruction.

That's what made me turn to HVAC filters as electret sources -- you
can get 'em at Home Depot, and layer 'em up as thick as you want.

But the Dr. of Dr. Phil's video emphasizes that the pedestrian masks
we're supposed to wear in public aren't to stop the virus -- that's
not how you get it. They're to keep us from touching our faces with
contaminated fingers -- that's how you get it. (Slowing out-going
payloads is a fringe benefit.)

Cheers,
James
 
On 2020-04-13 15:33, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com
wrote:

On Friday, April 10, 2020 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-10 09:55, Davej wrote:
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-09 11:56, Davej wrote:
Only good for 95% of particles larger than 0.3 uM. How about a
mask where you breathe through a chamber containing a sterilizing
UV lamp or percolating through some sort of fluid? How do the
military surplus NBC filters compare to the N/P95/99/100?


This article that James posted in the other thread is illuminating
on the properties of N95/N99 masks. For instance, I wouldn't have
guessed that alcohol will depolarize the electret filter layer.


Ooh, how about a powered electrostatic filter?

Electrostatic precipitators are used quite extensively. At one time you
could put them on your hot air furnace. Unfortunately they tend to
generate a fair bit of ozone, which is not a good thing to be breathing
and is also hard on the stuff in your house. In an industrial setting
(e.g. as part of a stack scrubber) it doesn't matter much because the
ozone is highly diluted and dissociates pretty fast (a few weeks). In a
recirculating system the concentration is higher and it's what you're
breathing all the time.


I am curious how the N95 uses a critical electrostatic charge in that
nasty fuzzy material while the round pink P100 filters look like a
totally different design.


From a classical physics POV, one would expect electrets not to work.
An object with a frozen-in charge imbalance or dielectric polarization
should attract surface charge until the field outside it is neutralized.

This is true in the far field. Closer to the surface, though, say
within 100 um, you still see the field. This turns out to be because in
a solid-state physics POV, there aren't enough available surface states
to balance out the frozen-in field. So if you configure them correctly,
e.g. in spun fibre form, you can make the equivalent of an electrostatic
precipitator.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


Is this internal charge scheme then also the mechanism for HEPA
vacuum bags? There has been controversy regarding their use for
mask filters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmYt_wtaLCk

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/

I've seen in several places instructions for making a mask from a
bandanna and two layers of coffee filter. Try breathing through even
one layer of coffee filter.

Two layers of duct tape will stop 100% of viruses.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top